Most helpful customer reviews
|
|
21 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Local eating experiment offers much food for thought, April 20 2007
100 Mile Diet is a candid portrayal of an ambitious couple who, during a twelve month period, strive to "do the right thing" ecologically by making every effort to consume food and beverages whose origins lie within 100 miles of where they are living at a point in time. Alisa Smith and James MacKinnon truly get back to the land, as they forage in the woods in British Columbia for mushrooms and other edible flora, cart their raw materials back to their humble, television-free log cabin, and prepare, cook and eat their meals.
This high level of vertical integration, in which the couple all but abandon the outputs of big agribusiness, results in food procurement and preparation becoming, at the very minimum, a part-time job. In other words, the current state of affairs in North America make such a lifestyle virtually unsustainable; at the end of the year of eating locally, the authors relish the prospect of eating food that is either heavily processed or comes from far away.
The authors make a valiant effort to locally source key foodstuffs such as fish and flour. They discover that it is often frustratingly difficult to meet such needs locally. The authors' year-long local eating experiment includes many stressful periods, as the couple debate food gathering and preparation options; for them, it is not a matter of just pulling a Swanson dinner out of the freezer and slapping it in the microwave.
North America has dumbed down its diet to an unnecessarily narrow variety of choices, thanks largely to industrial agriculture. Much of our mainstream `normal' diet consists of corn, tomatoes, wheat, apples and potatoes. These items are great in and of themselves, but the authors remind us that there are hundreds of types of vegetables and fruit indigenous to North America that, for the most part, consumers, and the industry that feeds them, choose to ignore.
The book is entertaining, informative and inspiring. It touches on both practical and philosophical issues. For example, one might intend to eat eggs that were laid by a local hen. Beyond this, one could `swim upstream' and inquire as to where the hen was born. Even if the hen was born and raised locally, what does one do if one discovers that the feed consumed by the chicken comes from far away? Does eating these eggs constitute `eating locally'? The authors allow that such analysis may border on the absurd, but these are fair questions nevertheless.
The food we North Americans eat exposes practical, philosophical and even political issues. Other things being equal, the decision to eat locally results in food having a lower carbon price tag (it took less fuel to ship it to the consumer), and often supports local farmers. However, if one has the choice of local celery grown with the help of pesticides versus organic celery that took a two thousand mile truck trip to get to your store, what do you do? Further, what if the local celery is available free of packaging, whereas the organic celery is sold in a plastic bag that took fossil fuels to produce, and will take over 100 years to biodegrade? This celery scenario is one our family faces quite often, regrettably. We usually do the politically correct thing and support the local farmer who uses pesticides to grow his celery, and forego the more healthful organic celery that, unfortunately and perhaps ironically, comes with a heavy carbon price tag.
I recommend this book to anyone who is striving to eat in a way that minimizes the ecological footprint of one's dietary choices. The book raises as many questions as it does answers - it is not a `how to' book, nor does the book pretend to be such. If enough people read the book and start to demand that their grocery stores stock locally grown items, the planet, and we who inhabit it, might all be better off.
|
|
|
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
How shall we live?, May 30 2007
Is it possible to eat locally, and what would it be like? To answer that question, the authors embarked on an experiment: a year of local eating.
But why eat locally? The authors start with the obvious carbon-footprint reason - the 1,500 or more miles that a typical meal travels to our plates, a number only made possible by cheap oil. Other more subtle reasons quickly emerge, and much of the interest of the book comes from exploring these reasons.
The book is the product of two specific people, living and writing in a specific place. It is a personal narrative, and needed to be written in the first person. This is done by simply alternating perspective - first chapter MacKinnon, second chapter Smith, etc. It works, and is far preferable to the third person they resort to for the short epilogue, or a fused first person where "I" becomes meaningless. (Yes, I've seen it done.) The format is straightforward: a month-by-month diary. Food is shared with friends; family crises, work assignments and relationship troubles come when they will. All are woven into the story, all somehow adding to the themes of the book. Also added to the recipe is a significant amount of research and interview: scientists, farmers, fishers and natives are given a voice.
The specific place is Vancouver, on Canada's Pacific coast. European civilization came late to this region, and not all the changes to it's ecology have yet been forgotten. As a resident of the same city, my familiarity with the area certainly enhanced my enjoyment of the book. (But no, in case you're wondering, I don't know the authors.) However, readers in other parts of the world will be compensated with the challenge of thinking about what constitutes local eating for their region, and how the experiment would be easier, more difficult, or otherwise different for them.
There are no villains in this book. The authors tell us how things are, and what they can learn of how they were. The reader is left to ponder the role of industrial food producers, governments, oil companies - and us, the consumers. The authors are conducting an experiment, not trying to form a new religion. 100 miles was their definition of local, not the only one. One chocolate bar or one working lunch at a Thai restaurant does not send them (or you) to hell. They don't claim it's easy for city-dwellers to eat locally today - they describe the challenges as well as the pleasures and possibilities. (Just because a species doesn't grow here, doesn't mean it can't.) They don't tell you that you have to do what they did (and let's face it, not everybody has their commitment, resourcefulness or culinary skill), but they do give you reasons why you might aspire to. They don't claim that everyone in Vancouver, or the rest of the world, could switch to a 100-mile diet overnight. The point is that they did it, and they wrote a book with the power to make you think.
By choosing to embark on their adventure, the authors have explored a parallel universe of local eating. By writing about it, and with with such skill, humour, intelligence and accessibility, they have become our guides to that possible universe. In the words of my university's PhD regulations, they have made a "contribution to knowledge". They deserve our thanks.
|
|
|
14 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A great story, well told, but a fundamentally flawed idea, May 19 2007
I followed the original serial of articles in the Tyee (an online newspaper) and felt that the premise behind the 100 mile diet is in itself inherently flawed.
Notwithstanding that you can in fact eat everything you need from what Nabhan dubbed your local foodshed, it ignores the reality that the vast majority of people don't have the time and effort available to them to make this plan work. Further, if the entire population of Greater Vancouver made this switch, it cannot be sustained. And that is its fundamental failing.
While the authors are very engaging and their story is very well told, a far better book, in my opinion, is "Coming Home to Eat" by Gary Paul Nabhan. He too writes about his eating experiences over the course of a year, but has a much more realistic view.
For one thing, Nabhan, who lives in Arizona, uses a 400 mile radius for his foodshed, which for Vancouverites would allow the cattle from the interior, the wines from the Okanagan, and a much broader array of fresh produce - the weekly Farmer's Markets in Vancouver provide a huge bounty of fresh fruits and vegetables that for the most part simply do not grow in Vancouver.
For another, Nabhan further allows 1 out of 5 things to come from outside the radius; Nabhan rightly recognizes that not everything can (or even should) be supplied locally. Even the ancient Greeks traded olive oil for wheat across the Mediterranean basin.
I respect the authors' point of view, and strongly endorse the concept of seasonal, local, and fresh. However, no matter how engaging their story is, it's unfortunately not a workable idea. Nabhan's is.
|
|
|
Most recent customer reviews
|