Against a Dark Background Paperback – Jan 5 1995
|New from||Used from|
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.
From Library Journal
On the run from a cult of intergalactic religious fanatics who want her death, the Lady Sharrow emerges from retirement to seek out a powerful artifact that may save her life--the legendary Lady Gun, a weapon that kills by altering the reality around it. The author of Consider Phlebas ( LJ 5/15/88) and The Player of Games ( LJ 2/15/89) has constructed a richly hued, far-future tapestry for his latest space adventure. Sophisticated prose, complex characters, and an unbridled imagination combine in this tale of high drama and intrigue. A good choice for most libraries.
Copyright 1993 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to the Mass Market Paperback edition.
Banks ain't kidding. He warned you up front that this is a dark novel―Norman Spinrad
There is now no British SF wirter to whose work I look forward to with greater keenness.―The Times
Imaginatively brilliant.―Daily Mail
Few of us have been exposed to a talent so manifest and of such extraordinary breadth―The New York Review of Science Fiction
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Top Customer Reviews
Well, compared to Banks' _The Wasp Factory_, this really isn't such a dark novel. I'll quote another reviewer from USENET who said "I can't trust an author who develops characters and kills them." This, however, is also a trait of Banks', and I cant imagine anyone would read this book expecting everyone to escape unscathed from the ominous, looming evil which permeates, quite frankly, every Banks book I've read.
The book tells a story of a woman, who becomes a metaphor for the star system she lives in. Unlike the Culture novels, the "Golter" system is at least a hundred million light years from the nearest star. They are entirely isolated. They have colonized all the planets and moons in their system, but have no hope of ever reaching anyone else. Sharrow is the same way. Alone, even while surrounded by others.
As the system society begins to attack itself, so, too, does Sharrow lose friends. Entire cities are wiped out.
This is not unexpected. You're reading a Banks novel. However, the finish of the book (as other reviewers have hinted, the last 100 pages are worth the rest of the book being somewhat slow and, well, pointless) is quite profound, and ties the rest of the story together in ways I really hadn't anticipated. It actually took me a couple days to reflect on it, and how I felt about the story he had told.
Surprisingly, after a couple days, I realized that what Banks was getting at was the good that actually came out of all the death and destruction in the book. I'll leave the reader to discover that on their own.
I'd highly recommend this to any Banks fan, but perhaps not to a first time Banks reader. Consider _Excession_ instead.
The dark atmosphere, the wonderful female lead character(one of the best ever in SF)and a truly haunting plot with 4-d chracters force me to turn the pages of this book over every now and again, either in my mind or between my fingers. If you enjoyed this novel, you should look into the works of the Australian Sci Fi author Greg Egan.
The only thing that I regret about this novel is that like many of Banks' works it is far from well known. Why, I cannot imagine.
But in the end, the book left me kinda hollow, if not depressed. Almost all the major characters are dead, quite some questions are left open, and if you pay close attention, there are more than a few events/developments which are at best questionable (i.e. if I didnt miss something, Girmeyn cant be older than 15(!) if he really is what Geis claimed him to be).
Of course, Banks had to make his point, how the Lazy Gun and his main character are linked together (I dont wanna tell too much for those ppl who havent read this book yet), but I'm repeating myself - too many deaths dont leave much room to cheer about.
Banks has a kind of wild, fervid, dark imagination that takes his work beyond the formula and cliche that permeates so much SF, yet his books are not really distopian or tragic. I think of Larry Niven and Arthur C. Clarke, but he is more complex and wittier, and his worlds and characters are vastly more engaging. Hmm - Remember the feeling of awe you got from "Rendezvous with Rama" and "Ringworld"? Mix in some "Die Hard" and "Alice In Wonderland"... That's as close as I can get
Most recent customer reviews
I don't know how I managed to read the whole book, maybe because I didn't have anything else to read or that in the first pages I spotted a too friendly character that I suspected... Read morePublished on Aug. 13 2012 by Pop Powl
I'm sorry to say I didn't enjoy Mr. Banks vision of a future world. His protagonist, Sharrow never really grabbed me as a living, breathing character involved in this quest she... Read morePublished on Feb. 27 2012 by R. W. Hogan
Very confusing storylines that never go anywhere and characters that never come to life made this a very difficult read. Mr. Read morePublished on May 31 2002 by Phillip G. Cameron
This is a confusing, disappointing book. I wish I could say that it had potential and the author simply dropped the ball on the follow through, but I'd be lying to you. Read morePublished on Sept. 8 2001 by Justus Pendleton
I can't decide if this book should get 3 or 4 stars. It is a good book, no doubt about that, it's just that I can't stand the kind of despair and doom that permeats the book. Read morePublished on Aug. 17 2001 by Greger Wikstrand
There are quite a few arguments that Iain Banks is among the top three greatest living authors of the latter part of the last century (and going into the next). Read morePublished on Oct. 31 2000 by Michael Battaglia
This is the finest science fiction novel I've ever read. Banks puts you in a totally unique, self-contained world, but never contradicts himself and never dwells on the details to... Read morePublished on Dec 23 1999 by JACOBUS VALK