An Experiment in Criticism and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading An Experiment in Criticism on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

An Experiment in Criticism [Paperback]

C. S. Lewis
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition CDN $3.28  
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  
Paperback, Jan. 31 1992 --  
Save Up to 90% on Textbooks
Hit the books in Amazon.ca's Textbook Store and save up to 90% on used textbooks and 35% on new textbooks. Learn more.
Join Amazon Student in Canada


Book Description

Jan. 31 1992 0521422817 978-0521422819 Reprint
Why do we read literature and how do we judge it? C. S. Lewis's classic An Experiment in Criticism springs from the conviction that literature exists for the joy of the reader and that books should be judged by the kind of reading they invite. He argues that 'good reading', like moral action or religious experience, involves surrender to the work in hand and a process of entering fully into the opinions of others: 'in reading great literature I become a thousand men and yet remain myself'. Crucial to his notion of judging literature is a commitment to laying aside expectations and values extraneous to the work, in order to approach it with an open mind. Amid the complex welter of current critical theories, C. S. Lewis's wisdom is valuably down-to-earth, refreshing and stimulating in the questions it raises about the experience of reading.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details


Product Description

Review

'Lewis is at one and the same time provocative, tactful, biased, open-minded, old-fashioned, far-seeing, very annoying and very wise.' Church Times

'Genuinely provocative ... makes the best case against evaluative criticism that I have read.' David Daiches, New York Times Book Review

Book Description

Why do we read literature and how do we judge it? C.S. Lewis's classic analysis springs from the conviction that literature exists for the joy of the reader and that books should be judged by the kind of reading they invite.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
IN this essay I propose to try an experiment. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
5.0 out of 5 stars
5.0 out of 5 stars
Most helpful customer reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars One of the Best... May 16 2004
Format:Paperback
Well-worth your time! Yes, Lewis is elitist, and yes, he creates a binary of sorts between the many and the few. However... talk about a fresh look at reader-response criticism!
Lewis argues that the best readers do not "use" texts to write their own stories within. Rather, the best readers are those who "receive" the text. In an era where ideology threatens literature and authors, Lewis offers a more noble route.
This book changed the way I read. And its not too long. =)
Was this review helpful to you?
5.0 out of 5 stars Half my life's in books' written pages... July 28 2002
Format:Paperback
...so goes the line from the old Aerosmith song, if I am remembering correctly. Well, none of us will live forever on this old earth; so is it right to give over much of that limited time to reading about things that never were or ever shall be? Read this book (whether you are a Christian or not hardly makes a difference when it comes to reading Experiment) for wise reflections on the reading life.
Was this review helpful to you?
By Mike London TOP 100 REVIEWER
Format:Paperback
As a person whose life is dedicated to art in all its various incarnations, this has proved the single most enlightening work I have ever had the pleasure of reading. While it itself is literary criticism and in one sense not literature but a study thereof, it's the most radical, revolutionary book I have read regarding art. Before I can continue, one point needs to be cleared first.
I'm a Christian, and I believe the single most important priority is to lead people to the knowledge and saving grace of the Lord Jesus Christ. You can do such through art. However, anything that Lewis wrote that lead someone to Jesus is, of course, more important than this book in that respect. Jesus comes first, art comes underneath that in priority, as do all things. That being said:

AN EXPERIMENT IN CRITICISM is the single most important work C. S. Lewis has produced when it comes to literature and the arts. THE CHRONICLES OF NARNIA, the SPACE TRILOGY, and TILL WE HAVE FACES are literature, but this overwhelms them all - not because of what it is (a universal principle that can be applied to art), but because of what it is not (a story or work of art that not everyone will have the same taste for). People may or may not like his fiction (although I find it rare to meet a person who doesn't like NARNIA) - but this book anyone can appreciate, especially those interested in literature in specific and art in general (for, although it concerns itself primarily with literature, this book also stands in defense of drama, music, painting, and the artistic endeavours of humankind in general). Because there are differing tastes in terms of fiction, people who will not read Lewis's own literature will (or should) read this.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
5.0 out of 5 stars Good and Bad Readership Nov. 28 2011
By Aaron
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
How do we assess literature? What makes books good? What makes them bad? Have we room for objectivity? An Experiment in Criticism was written to address these sorts of questions. Lewis suggests a contrast in readership rather than 'writership.' Literary readers 'receive' books and unliterary readers 'use' them. The same is true of musical and unmusical listeners and of artistic and inartistic viewers. What does it mean to 'receive'? It is a self-abnegation and self-transcendence. Lewis writes: 'The first demand any work of art makes upon us is surrender. Look. Listen . . . Get yourself out of the way . . . Wait. Attend. See what he is going to make of it' (pp. 19, 24). What does it mean to 'use'? Here the term is pejorative, connoting unreceptive exploitation and manipulation. So, art can be received or used. Reception adds to life; using does not. The receiver wants to rest in the work intrinsically; the user uses for extrinsic purposes.

Lewis concludes: books that permit - or, better still, encourage - good (that is, receptive) reading are good; books that do not are not. This critical reformulation 'focuses our attention on the act of reading' (p. 104). In other words, on what actualises the merely potential. It makes the job of the literary critic much harder. This is a welcome change, for literary criticism is now 'too easy' (p. 107). Moreover, 'the proposed system puts our feet on solid ground whereas the usual one puts them on a quicksand' (p. 105).

Now, this is just a clumsy bare-bones summary of Lewis' thesis. He covers much else besides - including, escapism and entertainment, literary realism, mythology, fantasy writing . . .
Was this review helpful to you?
5.0 out of 5 stars An Experiment in Reading Nov. 13 2009
By D Glover TOP 500 REVIEWER
Format:Paperback
It has been some years since I read this work so my review is based more on the lasting impression that this book left on me than on a fresh read with the argument clearly in my mind.

What I do remember is that in this provocative book, Lewis challenges readers to try a little experiment. He advocates judging a book not by evaluating its merits based on a set of criteria that some modernist professors in ivory tower English departments (or worse yet, psychology professors) have developed as a type of objective standard of worthiness (as most of us are taught even in grade school) or by some cultural trend that demands slavish obedience to its current fad (which we learn by osmosis through the media) but rather to look at the type of readers that enjoy a particular work and judge the work on the basis of who reads and enjoys it. Often, the criteria that are developed for literary criticism serve the purpose of setting the reader, or more truly the one who developed the criteria, over the work and thus the story is coloured by its perceived need to "measure up". Rather, Lewis calls readers to simply "receive" a story and let it carry the reader off in what ever direction the narrative tale and artistry of the language leads.

Lewis compares good literature to good art and great works of music and poor literature to mass produced kitsch (you know, the pictures in the furniture section of a department store, with the plastic faux gold frames) and elevator music. Good art is purchased and valued because of the emotional response it creates in the heart and mind of the beholder. This effect continues. Kitsch may sell in far greater numbers but it is `used' because of what it does for us. Kitsch matches the couch so we buy it and hang it on the wall; it is an accessory.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
Want to see more reviews on this item?
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Look for similar items by category


Feedback