CDN$ 72.14
  • List Price: CDN$ 89.26
  • You Save: CDN$ 17.12 (19%)
Usually ships within 1 to 2 months.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

An Introduction to Complex Function Theory Hardcover – Nov 12 1990


See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
CDN$ 72.14
CDN$ 72.14 CDN$ 101.39

2014 Books Gift Guide
Yes Please is featured in our 2014 Books Gift Guide. More gift ideas

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Join Amazon Student in Canada



Hero Quick Promo
Boxing Day Kindle Deals
Load your library with over 30 popular fiction books and more, today only. Learn more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 560 pages
  • Publisher: Springer; 1st ed. 1991. Corr. 2nd printing 1995 edition (Nov. 12 1990)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 038797427X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0387974279
  • Product Dimensions: 15.6 x 3.2 x 23.4 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 907 g
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #2,546,864 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

By A Customer on Nov. 29 2002
Format: Hardcover
This is a good text that covers somewhat more ground than either Ahlfors or vol. 1 of Conway, including a really nice, long section on conformal mapping. There are an astonishingly large number of exercises. The exposition is generally quite good, and the proofs are thorough and very detailed.
However, I would not want to use this as a primary text because it is too long-winded. Even the proofs have a lot of unnecessary verbiage. Put simply, it takes too damned long to read. I think the happy medium lies somewhere between the slick austerity of Rudin's analysis books and the overwritten style of Palka's book.
That said, I still think Palka's book is well worth having. You may never want to read it cover to cover, but I find it very useful to turn to when I am confused by other texts, or when I want a more detailed explanation of a given topic. Chances are that I'll find it here. Also, there are lots of good concrete examples, especially in the sections on residue techniques for integration and conformal mapping. And you will never run out of interesting exercises if you have this book around.
So what is the best primary text for complex analysis? Good question, and I don't have a good answer. Conway's book is pretty nice but unexciting. Ahlfors' is generally good but requires extremely careful reading (sometimes between the lines) to catch all the nuances; it also feels a bit old-fashioned for my tastes. The recent version of Narasimhan's book, with the large collection of expository exercises by Nievergelt, is much more efficient, sophisticated, and challenging than the others and looks like it will serve as a very good reference/second course after learning the material elsewhere.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 10 reviews
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful
Good Secondary Text Nov. 29 2002
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
This is a good text that covers somewhat more ground than either Ahlfors or vol. 1 of Conway, including a really nice, long section on conformal mapping. There are an astonishingly large number of exercises. The exposition is generally quite good, and the proofs are thorough and very detailed.
However, I would not want to use this as a primary text because it is too long-winded. Even the proofs have a lot of unnecessary verbiage. Put simply, it takes too damned long to read. I think the happy medium lies somewhere between the slick austerity of Rudin's analysis books and the overwritten style of Palka's book.
That said, I still think Palka's book is well worth having. You may never want to read it cover to cover, but I find it very useful to turn to when I am confused by other texts, or when I want a more detailed explanation of a given topic. Chances are that I'll find it here. Also, there are lots of good concrete examples, especially in the sections on residue techniques for integration and conformal mapping. And you will never run out of interesting exercises if you have this book around.
So what is the best primary text for complex analysis? Good question, and I don't have a good answer. Conway's book is pretty nice but unexciting. Ahlfors' is generally good but requires extremely careful reading (sometimes between the lines) to catch all the nuances; it also feels a bit old-fashioned for my tastes. The recent version of Narasimhan's book, with the large collection of expository exercises by Nievergelt, is much more efficient, sophisticated, and challenging than the others and looks like it will serve as a very good reference/second course after learning the material elsewhere.
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Fantastic for self study Oct. 8 2007
By Bryan E. Bischof - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
I agree that the exposition and proof's are both wordy, but for self study I found this invaluable. I took this course as a reading course, which means no lecture accompanies the course. I find most weeks, I can solve nearly all of the problems assigned by 1-3 readings of the chapter. This is in my opinion the best book I found to date for self study. However, the addition of solutions to selected exercises would be even better. I recommend the book for those wishing for a introduction to complex analysis, or those with some background and wishing to extend their background to include the material covered on most complex qualifying exams.
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
outstanding: a book to be read and reread. Aug. 14 1998
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
The best introductory book on Complex Functions I have ever seen. Clear, well-thought, well written, full of examples, leaves nothing out, even some umpleasant facts about Homology and the Cauchy Integral Formula. Many exercises, from easy to challenging, many diagrams, this book leaves the reader ready for advanced work in Complex Analysis. A masterpiece.Gustavo Rocha da Silva.
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Wordy, but comprehensive June 19 2002
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
I took this class from Dr. Palka himself back in 1994. He is obsessed with words when he speaks and naturally it comes across in his text. One of the few math books where I've occasionally been forced to utilize an English language dictionary. I am not sure whether this is a negative or a positive. It certainly didn't result in me learning any less about the subject.
Besides that Palka includes numerous calculational examples and problems covering a lot of extra material that is both useful and interesting. The lack of solutions makes it difficult for self-study, but you learn more from the problems if it's left up to you to be the final authority on whether it's right or wrong.
Anyway, I give the book a 9 for Comprehensiveness and Readability and a 6 for Succintness. But it's definitely a 10 for range and depth of problems and examples.
5 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Very readable text. June 1 2001
By "kwrcheng" - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
I used this book for a first course in complex analysis. This book comprehensively covers the standard topics in a first course. There are also enrichment sections for those who are interested (such as proving certain definitions are equivalent to the usual definitions). The style of writing is very readable, but this is at the expense of using a lot of words and hence the author sometimes takes a long time to explain a simple idea. This book is not written concisely for this reason. Also, the book does not set out definitions as separate paragraphs nor are they numbered (this seems to be increasingly common for math texts); they are buried within the text, and are very difficult to find later on. Proofs are given out in full and explained in detail with lots of words (at the expense of length and terseness), so that readers can understand very easily. There are plenty of examples, and they demonstrate good techniques for evaluating integrals. There are many exercises and solutions are not provided. Historical facts and footnotes are seldomly found. I believe this book is also suitable for less-prepared students.


Feedback