Quantity:1

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Colour:
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
      

Augustine [Blu-ray] (Version française) [Import]


List Price: CDN$ 39.02
Price: CDN$ 37.91 & FREE Shipping. Details
You Save: CDN$ 1.11 (3%)
Only 3 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
13 new from CDN$ 23.22 1 used from CDN$ 31.38

Today Only: "Alf: The Complete Series" for $29.99
Today only: Alf: The Complete Series is at a one day special price. Offer valid on December 21, 2014, applies only to purchases of products sold by Amazon.ca, and does not apply to products sold by third-party merchants and other sellers through the Amazon.ca site. Learn more

Product Details

  • Format: Subtitled, NTSC, Import
  • Language: French
  • Subtitles: English
  • Region: Region A/1
  • Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Studio: Music Box Films
  • Release Date: Sept. 17 2013
  • ASIN: B00D4Q1UYM

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 7 reviews
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Not Enough Character, Not Enough Story Aug. 4 2013
By Doug Anderson - Published on Amazon.com
Format: DVD
In the opening scene, 19-year old servant Augustine (French pop star Soko) has a violent seizure at a high society banquet. The onlookers have no idea what they are seeing or what to do about it, except throw water on her. When Augustine awakens, she cannot open her left eye and so she is shipped off to a posh clinic (that looks more like a chateau than a hospital) in the countryside to be treated by Dr. Charcot (Vincent Lindon) who specializes in female hysteria. We have no idea who decided to send her there, or who is paying for this extravagant and controversial treatment, nor do we ever learn. What we do learn very early on is that director Alice Winocour is uninterested in such details but is very interested in the fact that the doctor's profession is a compromised one as the doctor must continually market his research/work to potential backers, and an essentail part of this marketing involves treating his profession as a form of theatre and staging/inducing hysterical fits (which look like fits of female self-pleasure) in his female patients for his male onlookers curiosity/enjoyment/amusement. This is obviously the part of this history (based on actual characters and true-life events) that Winocour finds facinating but she fails to find much there that offers us much in the way of insight into male or female psychology. Yes, the doctor is interested in Augustine not just because she suffers from a peculiar form of female hysteria but because she is an attractive sufferer but this will not surprise anyone (living then or now). Yes, there is sexual tension between doctor and patient but this too will not surprise anyone. In fact, nothing about this story is surprising or unexpected. And that is a problem. Director Winocour also casts Chiara Mastroianni (daughter of Marcello and Catherine Deneuve) as the doctor's wife, but her main task is just to throw disapproving/suspicious glances at her husband at dinner parties when she hears him or others discuss his unusual methods and his attractive patient or when she reads the journals and papers that ritually criticize/ridicule this form of theatre that the doctor parades as science. This too will strike viewers as an all-too-predictable and unsurprising cinematic trope. The doctor's profession and professional status is of course compromised/complicated by the sexual attraction that he feels for his patient, but this sexual attraction/tension (that Augustine may feel for him as well) is never really explored or analyzed and is only partially (and awkwardly) resolved by films end and most viewers will walk away from this scratching their heads and asking themselves "what was that all about?" This is Alice Winocour's first feature film and she does a commendable job at recreating late-19th century Paris but she seems more interested in exploiting this salacious material than in really digging very deeply into the psychologies or sexualities of either Augustine or Dr. Charcot and that is going to leave many viewers feeling dissatisfied with this rather cursory period/character sketch. I suppose you could argue that Winocour leaves her characters undefined/undeveloped because they do not know themselves and their own motives and I think that is partially true, but a director still needs to give viewers enough information to make heads or tails of what they see and I don't think the director ever gives us enough to work with or think about. What is clear is that Augustine's strange paralysis is meant to serve as an obvious metaphor for the paralysis women feel in the male-dominated social world of Belle Epoque Paris and thats obvious enough (so obvious that Winocour finds ways to make its obviousness almost laughable), what is less clear is what specific (intentional/unintentional) chain of events led to Augustine's paralysis and eventual cure. Other than this sort of generalized sense of helplessness in male dominated Paris, we never learn anything specific about Augustine's past, present or future. She is a cipher throughout. If anything, the final few scenes only complicate an already under-defined character even more. Even though French pop star Soko as Augustine is always intriguing to watch, we are never allowed any privileged glimpse into Augustine's world which might help clarify anything, instead she remains as much of a mystery and as far away from us as she is from the doctor who focuses on her unusual physical symptoms and rarely asks her any personal questions (the version of psychology we are used to) that might allow us insight into the actual cause of her condition. Again, you could say that director Winocour is purposefully leaving things undefined and purposefully refusing to cater to (or import) 20th-century notions of female psychology (and storytelling) into her 19th-century film/tale, but the effect of this is that we never get to know her main character nor her equally mysterious doctor who supposedly learnt so much about his profession/female hysteria from this one patient. As a result, most viewers will leave the film feeling a bit confused/undernourished by these incomplete characters and this under-developed/imagined sketch of a story.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Augustine review April 21 2014
By Deborah C. Stewart - Published on Amazon.com
Verified Purchase
Not enough historical depth not to mention psychological verity. Instead, this film settled for a sexualized account of a historical psychologist and a patient.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Revealing March 12 2014
By antaeaventura - Published on Amazon.com
Format: DVD
Well worth watching to observe women who have been abused in the past and then are re-abused by the 'doctors' trying to 'cure' them. For further understanding of this subject see: Women and Madness, by Phyllis Chessler, Assault on Truth by Jeffrey Masson and anything by Alice Miller (European Psychoanalyst). The abuse of women has a long history and we all need to understand it better.
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Horrifying, Informative, Funny and Sad July 19 2013
By Jay B. Lane - Published on Amazon.com
Format: DVD
This entry from France (English captions) to the 2013 Seattle International Film Festival is by turn, horrifying, informative, funny and sad. Written and directed by Alice Winocour, I wasn't sure if this had any real basis in fact. Reminded of "Hysteria" released in June of 2012, which named real people treating the same "ailment" in 19th century England, I wondered if this too, was equally grounded. Happily, I found plenty of evidence that it is based on real people. Unfortunately, the barbaric equipment they used in their "treatments" is also based on fact. That is the horrifying part!

We watch:
* Vincent Lindon ("La moustache") is wonderful as Professeur Jean-Martin Charcot, whose well-documented treatments for hysteria were conducted at Salpêtrière School. The young women who were his patients had almost epileptic spasms, cut themselves and were otherwise self abusive. The professor was a dedicated ethical man, but he WAS a man....
* Soko ("Friends from France") is our eponymous heroine, a serving maid in a prominent home who falls down in a terrifying fit, and awakens to find her right eye is paralyzed and closed. She is sent to Salpêtrière where her treatments begin. The patients there are expected to earn their keep, so she is working with the poultry when a cook beheads a hen. She has another fit, only to discover that now her eye works but the ailment has traveled to another part of her body. And so it goes...
* Chiara Mastroianni ("Persepolis" voice) is the professor's wife, Constance. She seems to suspect that some of her husband's young female patients might find a cure for their hysteria in his well-tailored trousers. (I began to suspect the same thing!)

Of course with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, we can easily discount all the experiments and theories they worked on at the time, but we actually DO care about that man's career.

As I said, this was interesting and informative. Just know that a chicken is beheaded in living color. Expect some nudity, no profanity or gunshots... I'm sure it will eventually be R-rated because of content. Double check at Amazon when it becomes available 09-17-13.
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
I streamed this March 13 2014
By ron - Published on Amazon.com
Verified Purchase
The streaming quality was about like DVD not Bluray, and I have a fast download speed(10 mbp).I like french movies and this one is honest and good, not like so much of the crap out there today. ron


Feedback