Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth
 
 

Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth [Hardcover]

Joe Conason
4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (140 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  

Product Details


Product Description

From Amazon

Conservative talk show hosts and newspaper columnists have made an industry out of incessantly deriding the American left, citing liberals for everything from moral decay to bad economic policy to a soft approach on terrorism. Often these accusations are bound in book form and sell quite well. Only one problem, according to Salon.com and New York Observer writer Joe Conason: the charges they're leveling just aren't true. In Big Lies, Conason dissects 10 of the most persistent, and--according to him--glaringly incorrect, arguments made by conservatives. Each chapter begins with a quotation ("Liberals control the media and misuse their influence to promote left-wing politics," "Conservatives are the only true champions of free enterprise"), which is then picked apart using statistical evidence and detailed historical research and rejected. The modern right wing, in the opinion of Conason, is not the bastion of virtue and defender of the common man it claims to be. Rather, it is a calculating and shrewdly efficient group of propagandists fueled by revenues generated by a system that rewards cronyism. Granted, it doesn't take much to deflate the bombast of shrill political talk show hosts whose very living depends on making shocking accusations about public figures, a couple of raw facts usually does the trick, but Conason offers more than simple refutation, going deeper to challenge the presumptions that generate such platitudes. And he navigates a highly readable and informative writing style that feels more substantive than Molly Ivins and Al Franken but still a lot wittier than Noam Chomsky. Many of Conason's arguments, like those of his foes, naturally come down to matters of opinion, and published material can readily be found to back up nearly any perspective. Nonetheless, he presents clear and logical points, and his thinking is well supported by both the historical record and empirical data. Accusing Joe Conason of lies (of any size) would certainly be a difficult task. --John Moe

From Publishers Weekly

Liberals are fighting back, and Conason, a columnist for the New York Observer and Salon, delivers what he hopes will be a knockout blow to Ann Coulter (whom he accuses of "manufacturing... sham outrage for personal gain and political advantage") and her liberal-bashing comrades on the right. He lands some fine punches as he turns what he terms their "lies" back on themselves, amassing evidence that it's conservatives who are the elitists, who hold sway in the media, who violate family values (though Conason's chapter on what he casts as the hypocrisy of Newt Gingrich and his cohorts, trotting out one sexual transgression after another, quickly becomes distasteful). Conason's case is substantial, especially in dismissing conservatives' espousal of the free market-arguing that what they really support is selfish crony capitalism (he indicts the Bushes at length)- and in reviewing of Clinton's strong anti-al-Qaida campaign to counter charges that he was "soft" on terrorism. (Liberals will find it particularly delicious that then senator John Ashcroft led the battle against Clinton's effort to get government control over encryption software on civil liberties grounds.) But most of Conason's points are already well rehearsed, though liberals may find it useful to have them gathered in one volume. Despite conservative Republican election victories, Conason argues, polls show that most Americans sympathize with liberal positions on issues from the tax system to the environment. Still, it's not clear that what eventually becomes a tiresome litany of the sins of the right is the best way to remind Americans of where their sympathies really lie.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
One of the most successful themes of conservative propaganda is the notion that the right, not the left, represents everyday working Americans. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

 

Customer Reviews

140 Reviews
5 star:
 (88)
4 star:
 (22)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:
 (6)
1 star:
 (22)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.1 out of 5 stars (140 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent!, July 17 2004
By 
Joshua L. Bessom (Huntington Beach, CA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth (Hardcover)
Ok - I haven't read it, but I just finished "Banana Republicans". For anyone who really wants to know how the right took over in the US I highly recommend this book. The "liberal bias" that is supposedly in the media is not really bias, because most people ARE liberal, whether the conservatives want to admit it or not. Massive corporations have brainwashed the public through think tanks that conservatism is somehow good for America. Don't let the radical religious right and corporations tell you what's good for the country.
Liberalism is the true heart of America. CARING about your fellow man. Working for equality in the workplace, a clean environment, etc. How can anyone discount how beautiful these ideas are? American right wing politics have been an absolute disaster, and I can't wait for the PEOPLE to take back their country. This is the first time the republicans have controlled the house, senate, supreme court, and presidency since 1935. The reason? THEY DON'T REPRESENT THE PEOPLE!!!!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5.0 out of 5 stars Concise, entertaining, compelling., July 11 2004
By A Customer
This review is from: Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth (Hardcover)
Thank God for the publishing industry! It's the only corner of the corporate-owned media that hasn't been co-opted and corrupted by right-wing demagoguery and anti-liberal (that is, anti-American) hysteria.

I loved this book, not because I learned a lot from it, but because it puts into words, clearly and concisely, many things I've been thinking about and trying to articulate for some time now. The current strain of "conservatism" (it's not really conservatism at all, it's authoritarian radicalism) is vicious, anti-American, and ruthless. This book simply details, in plain, reasonable, lucid language, some of the right's many oppressive and coercive rhetorical and propagandistic tricks. I've got a whole library of political books dealing with the current crisis in government (although I can't keep up with them all) and this is one of the best of the general titles. It's also short and sweet and easy to read, which is a plus.

The other indispensable book I'd recommend to centrists and "mild conservatives" (i.e., traditional, non-radicalized Republicans) is John Dean's "Worse Than Watergate." Dean is the commentator who best understands the role of the "shadow co-President" who is masquerading as Vice President.

I really enjoyed "Big Lies" and would recommend it wholeheartedly to any real American on either side of the political divide.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3.0 out of 5 stars Most People Suffer From Historical Amnesia, July 3 2004
By 
This review is from: Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth (Hardcover)
Joe Conason (JC) is a good writer and this book is a quite easy read. I highly suggest this book over Al Franken book. When you compare the two side by side you realize, that JC is targeting a higher level of sophistication. He disperses with the juvenile swear words and the pedantic ranting that fill AF's book. JC takes the intelligent and reasoned approached one that I prefer over the caustic AF.

This does not make the book great though, rather than try to correct every point in the book I have listed just a few brief examples of illogical deductions or downright lies.

The Mine Safety and Health Administration did not rescue the miners as JC implied instead it was a combination of volunteers and paid professionals who effected the rescue. (14-15)

JC was completely disingenuous in how much the average taxpayer received back in Bush's tax cut. The tax cuts were equal across the board but the best he could come up with is people who paid NO Federal tax got NO money back. HOW UNFAIR! (16-17)

To prove that the media isn't biased he states that conservatives actually get to voice their opinions in the editorial sections this is terrible compared to 20 years ago when they were excluded completely (30) and again he is irked that the newspapers even allow conservatives to pen their thoughts. (41)

JC asserts that Ann Coutler gets good reviews of her books by the press these are the examples of good reviews:
"Insult Slinging", "Sarcastic overhype", "Piece of agit-pop", "Pretends to intellectual seriousness where there is none." (32)
Wow if those are good reviews I would hate to see the bad ones.

JC is very upset that the media might even report that there is a bias (38-39) Shhh don't talk about it and nobody will notice.

To prove there is no bias JC shows these rather strange statistics for political endorsements for presidential candidates by Gannett Papers
1996 29% of the papers endorsed Bob Dole
2000 38% of the papers endorsed George Bush
He than follows those statistics up with this quote
"The trend favors republicans; Bob Dole won many more endorsements that Bill Clinton did in 1996, but not by the margin as impressive as that Bush achieved in 2000." (39-40)
Amazing 38% is an IMPRESSIVE margin. Well, NO, JC 38% shows the pervasive liberal bias. Nice try

NPR has politically balanced programming (47) STOP LAUGHING I didn't write that JC did, I guess politically balanced programming means that NO right or even middle of the road voice is heard.

Another great quote: "Conservatives enjoy other vast stretches of uncontested terrain in the national media." (48) His than lists all that he can think of to prove his point: 3 newspapers, 2 magazines, FOX news.
That's it folks that's the extreme conservative bias in the news.

To prove that CNBC is slanted powerfully to the right JC found that the WSJ ONCE had a show on it. Oh my God, 1 show, on 1 hour, once a week. That is 1 out of 148 hours of weekly programming that was conservative and that makes them slanted powerfully to the right. (48-49)
BTW the show was cancelled it is now 148 out of 148 hours of liberal programming. Thank God no more right wing slant.

He admits that Dan Rather and the CBS news are liberal (51)
Wait a second JC just spent 20 pages explaining that the media was slanted to the right, he even slammed Bernard Goldberg for saying Dan was liberal, but now he admits it. The only conservative voice on the Network or Cable news is FOX and everything else is liberal. Thanks for 20 pages of TRUE LIES.

JC is upset that Anne Coutler actually dates men and has many close GAY friends. (113) So much for normal homophobic invectives bandied about by the left.

One of my favorite quotes by JC "Conservatives cannot compete in the black community because they uphold color-blind principle, civil-quality and the constitution" (129) WOW such brutal honest Joe, those damn color-blind, non-racists, constitution believing scum on the right what are they thinking?

In the end you are left rather exasperated. It seems that JC thought pattern, like much of other current day liberal authors is, if you repeat a lie often enough it will become the truth. His examples throughout the book are simply stated, PATHETIC. They usually show the exact opposite of his intended point, but it doesn't matter to him or to his INTENDED audience. They have no interest in the truth and even when they are presented facts such as a 38% endorsement for Bush is "PREVASIVE" conservative bias they simply fall to think what percentage then endorsed Gore?

On page 3 JC wrote probably the biggest truth of this book "If Americans have a common fault, however, it's our tendency to suffer from historical amnesia." Joe you are right that is how you can claim the Civil Right Act was a liberal victory. The majority of Americans, especially liberal ones, do not know that more liberals voted AGAINST civil rights than conservatives. Its simple facts like these that you turn around and they wage your campaign of BIG LIES.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Want to see more reviews on this item?
 Go to Amazon.com to see all 156 reviews  4.1 out of 5 stars 
 
 
Most recent customer reviews











Only search this product's reviews



Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback