The recent political climate in which this film is set against, is Eastwood's interest in victims from a conservative standpoint. It should be stated, and he stated this on tv today, he approaches the subject not from the standpoint of a party hack or representing a party, but from the standpoint of the artist, in response to the community where he lives to search out a way so that in the future victimization is lessenned. Romney has taken up this theme in the election, who as a religious person has philosophical and human(e) interest for him...in the bonus feature a costar of spanish ethnic background talks of Eastwood the 'man of elysian fields' the heavely realm which occupies the actor's imagination and prompts and stirs him in his work. He's a man with a spanish heart. Recall his film Two Mules for Sister Sara with Shirley Maclaine. He talks of the maturity of people as a way to spring forward and maturity is apparent in his view of people. The film is not thought to be one of his better roles, and the private eye has him going against type, in a genre mastered by James Garner, who can really replace him, and such icons of the past as Robert Mitchum and Humphrey Bogart. So this film presents Eastwood with a challenge. Plus, as a classic actor whoose movies are watched like no other american, he knows he will be under the microscope. He mentions in the bonus feature he recently made Space Cowboys with some old stars, perhaps the thought that this film really has a private eye..and he in no way tries to match or replicate these old actors way of doing the role, and I believe that's why the audience may feel its not him at his best, I disagree with that, he's just in different terrain...and although Space Cowboys was a differnet area in which he stands out in a good film...here he's being compared to the genre...with great actors. We are in an area of some controversey, FBI profiling, heart transplant and a vctim or two, and an ethnic discussion of a Russian, a hardworking person working for little money, who robs a Chinese shopkeeper. Also along is Jeff Daniels in an intersting role whom Eastwood in Shakespearean language calls an excellent actor excelling in 'bufoonery.' The chief we are told has a problem,he is seen to be a voyeur which may effect his profiling skills...the change from old policing to more modern investigative techniques...as in other films the Eastwood character stresses doing a good job, professionalism. As in the other films in rescuing the victim, he is the 'lone ranger' sans Tonto. he realizes he is against a hateful-evil- thing...this is very old fashioned language, and is focused on his dramatization of stories on victims, abandondoning the social sciences and describing things in terms of evil...why are some good and bad. There are also references to Valentine's Day..a few references and love...and scenes of carnage and slaughter and gory bloodied victims...our broken society in ways if only love was stronger than death as the disgusting images reappear and at films end the perpetrator is extinguished...if that is really aresolution? But that's our world..the film talks of the integrity of crime investigations..or its converse...in relation to the plight of and rescue of victims,,,and Eastwood's character has a new physical heart...and is a renaissance of sorts figure...a new heart to make a new world...but just him alone...there are many spanish costars and a mexico angle in film and he takes picture with these stars in bonus feature...Eastwood is really in a territorry mastered by others...but he puts in a good performance well in line thematically with his other films...