Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

CDN$ 25.84 + CDN$ 3.49 shipping
In Stock. Sold by marvelio-ca

Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
thebookcomm... Add to Cart
CDN$ 27.36
M and N Media Canada Add to Cart
CDN$ 35.28
Have one to sell? Sell yours here

Bram Stoker's Dracula (Bilingual)

Gary Oldman , Winona Ryder , Francis Ford Coppola    DVD
3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (338 customer reviews)
Price: CDN$ 25.84
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by marvelio-ca.

Frequently Bought Together

Bram Stoker's Dracula (Bilingual) + Interview With the Vampire [Import]
Price For Both: CDN$ 32.60

These items are shipped from and sold by different sellers.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Product Details

Product Description

Product Description

Bram Stoker's Dracula


With dizzying cinematic tricks and astonishing performances, Francis Coppola's 1992 version of the oft-filmed Dracula story is one of the most exuberant, extravagant films of the 1990s. Gary Oldman and Winona Ryder, as the Count and Mina Murray, are quite a pair of star-crossed lovers. She's betrothed to another man; he can't kick the habit of feeding off the living. Anthony Hopkins plays Van Helsing, the vampire slayer, with tongue firmly in cheek. Tom Waits is great fun as Renfield, the hapless slave of Dracula who craves the blood of insects and cats. Sadie Frost is a sexy Lucy Westenra. And poor Keanu Reeves, as Jonathan Harker, has the misfortune to be seduced by Dracula's three half-naked wives. There's a little bit of everything in this version of Dracula: gore, high-speed horseback chases, passion, and longing.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Blood and Sex Sell Well Oct. 15 2001
Format:VHS Tape
Yes, both blood and sex can do wonders for a film at the box office, so when you can combine them in a movie like "Bram Stoker's Dracula", of course you'll have a hit. You may not, however, have a truly good movie, but that's another matter.
This was a somewhat uncomfortably sex-filled movie, so you'll have to be mindful of who you're seeing it with, especially that scene when the beastly vampire is having his way with a willing maiden in the garden. Pass the smelling salts over to Aunt Bee for that one!
Anthony Hopkins gets my vote for best sell-out ham acting since Laurence Olivier's Van Helsing from the Frank Langella version. Once those Brits get that "Sir" title, they just go to pot!
It is interesting, though, to see a sympathetic portrayal of Count Dracula, but you see, that's NOT "Bram Stoker's" version, so this film ought rightly to have been named, "Francis Ford Coppola's Dracula" to give credit where it is due.
Sink your teeth into this one, if taking all this into consideration, you're game.
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars This is the same director as Apocolypse Now??? Nov. 21 2002
I know I'm pretty much alone in saying this but I really didn't like this movie. This movie really feels like it fails to go anywhere. This movie doesn't know what ideas it wants to convey or who it wants it's characters to be. Is Dracula a bad guy or a tragic figure? We'll never know for sure except well... when he looks ugly he's evil and... it's scary... isn't it??? This movie trys to scare you and trys to show you romance and as if it weren't bad enough it couldn't make up it's mind... well it fails at both. The creatures in this movie are more corny than scary such as Dracula in a very fake looking bat-form. Characters are so undeveloped, we have no insight into any of their personalities (except Lucy) and the performance by Keanau is flater than usual and Anthony Hopkins gives us a huge disappointment. His character is as goofy and senseless as this whole movie. The "beautiful" scenery and photography can't even save this film, even if it truly was beautiful.
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
By Corky
Read Bram Stoker's Dracula FIRST. Please. Preferably late at night, in bed, with only one light on beside you. And let the shudders run deliciously up your spine.
Then watch this. If you must.
What bothers me most is the gall of Coppola to call it *Bram Stoker's* Dracula. It isn't. It is visually gorgeous, erotic, if sexist (why's Sadie Frost always popping out of her top??) and presents an interesting reason for why Dracul became Dracula. As a love story, it worked, and in that context I enjoyed the relationship between Mina/Elizabeta and Dracul (during a second viewing). But I was expecting a version more faithful to the original, so was very disappointed and unable to appreciate it the first time around. I do think it is a lovely movie, but the acting left me cold (Anthony Hopkins couldn't even take it seriously, why should I?). So it gets one star, for being nowhere near as captivating as the novel, for the misleading title, and generally disappointing feel.
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Bram Stoker's? Aug. 5 2002
By A Customer
I had just finished reading the book Dracula, and I decided to watch this movie. It was so disappointing. The characters were all there, but most of the movie was not even in the book. I did not at all understand the part about Dracula's obsession with Mina, that did not at all happen in the book. And I guess I must have been the only person who did not feel that the whole blood sucking routine was not at all sexual, what was the point of having women running around topless? (I must have missed that part in the book) I also thought the the character of Mina was terribly written; in the book, I felt that she was one of the most respectable characters, and truly loved her husband, however, in this movie I really hated her, and I don't think the viewer was supposed to.
The whole movie in general was overly done, and not that bad, but I would not have a problem with it, just don't call it Bram Stoker's.
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Should Remove Bram Stoker's Name From The Title! Nov. 3 2002
By the title, I expected a straight forward adaptation of Bram Stoker's original all-time classic. But don't be fooled as I was; this tragic piece of sex-and-gore falls flat in the end, and exploits Bram Stoker's good name.
The acting by Gary Oldman and Winona Ryder are very good, actually, but Keanu Reeves' performance as Johnathon Harker is one of his all-time worst. Anthony Hopkins is the only relief, who seems to be having a blast as the eccentric scientist/vampire killer Abraham Van Helsing, and is very entertaining to watch.
There's just too much emphasis on sex and cool photograpgy, rather than spending time trying to scare you; it's NOT SCARY!
You wanna see good Dracula? Then go see the 1958 Hammer verion (it's great!), or even the Mel Brooks spoof of it! Anything's better than waisting your time with this poor excuse for a horror film!
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Oh my god! July 2 2003
By Esenada
One of the worst movies on the subject ever made. A shocking script and terrible performances all round make this a laughable installation to the Dracula legend. Gary Oldman is at his usual over-acting worst, and Keanu Reeves is shocking as Jonathan Harker, effecting the worst English accent in the history of cinema. Winona Ryder bored my packet off; the exchanges between her and Reeves were sickening along with the rest of the script, Harker: We can be married when I return.
Mina: Oh Jonathan.....Jonathan....Oh Jonathan.....
I'm sorry if I seem harsh, but please try and avoid this movie lest you like it. And of course we had to have a big American, with a big moustache and a big knife because obviously Mr Coppola thought our interest could not be aroused without an American charater. Balls, pure balls.
Was this review helpful to you?
Want to see more reviews on this item?
Most recent customer reviews
2.0 out of 5 stars Two Stars
Just watched because of Gary Oldman and the amazing costume designer Eiko Ishioka...other than that, not very worth it.
Published 8 hours ago by Francesca
2.0 out of 5 stars Two Stars
couldn't get into it
Published 6 days ago by Shaun Courtney
5.0 out of 5 stars Outstanding!
Great rendition of a masterfully written gothic novel.
Published 8 days ago by Oscar
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Fast shipping, product as described. A +!
Published 2 months ago by Guy Lesperance
Definetely a classic by Francis Ford Coppola, based on the well crafted Bram Stoker novel I read long ago and still own. Read more
Published 3 months ago by R. Paquette
3.0 out of 5 stars Bought for the Anthony Hopkinks actor.
Not my best vampire movie, but ok. The disguise is much to unreal. A traditional dracula that could of been more explicit.
Published 10 months ago by Papineau
5.0 out of 5 stars le meilleur Dracula de tous les temps
Heureux de posséder ce film avec une qualité d'image exceptionnelle. Copolla a su rendre a ce film la vraie histoire de Dracula.
Published 16 months ago by Jacques Potvin
1.0 out of 5 stars tragedy
One of the great tragedies of film making.
All the potential was there: Fantastice book; present day special effects technology, people like Gary Oldman, Anthony Hopkins;... Read more
Published on June 19 2012 by JAMES P. NEVINS
3.0 out of 5 stars Not worth the upgrade
A bit disappointing
I was expecting a better picture and a better sound.
Not very different from the original DVD.
Picture and sound is exactly the same as original.
Published on April 2 2012 by Meg1st
5.0 out of 5 stars DVD Review of Bram Stoker's Dracula
I received this DVD in excellent condition, it arrived well within the timeline estimated. I am entirely satisfied in every aspect. Read more
Published on Jan. 30 2012 by Craig Pittman
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Look for similar items by category