Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Chambers Dictionary of Etymology [Hardcover]

Barnhart
3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
List Price: CDN$ 59.00
Price: CDN$ 36.99 & FREE Shipping. Details
You Save: CDN$ 22.01 (37%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
Want it delivered Thursday, July 31? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout.
Join Amazon Student in Canada


Book Description

Sept. 15 1999 0550142304 978-0550142306
How are the words 'door' German 'Tzr' and Sanskrit 'dvar' related? When did the word Blarney first appear in print? What's the linguistic history of the word 'history'? The Chambers Etymological Dictionary holds all the answers for any person curious about the origins of the words they use, and how these words have changed over time. This fascinating dictionary explores the development of meaning, spelling, and pronunciation of over 25,000 English words. Over 30,000 detailed entries trace words back to their Proto-Germanic or Indo-European roots, and include words borrowed from other languages, as well as the sources and dates of their first recorded use. For many years academics, wordsmiths, crossword lovers, and language enthusiasts of all stripes have turned to this celebrated volume as their reference of choice in lexical matters. First published as the Barnhart Etymological Dictionary, the Chambers Dictionary of Etymology offers a unique combination of approachability and authoritativeness in an accessible single-volume format, making it an essential etymological resource for the expert, and a fascinating reference for the general reader. Sample entry from the Chambers Etymological Dictionary: blarney n. flattering, coaxing talk. 1766, Lady Blarny (for Blarney), a smooth-talking flatterer in Goldsmith's the Vicar of Wakefield, her name being a literary contrivance in allusion to Blarney Stone, a stone in a castle near Cork, Ireland. Anyone kissing the stone is supposed to become skillful in flattering and coaxing. The word is used in its general sense in a letter of Sir Walter Scott (1796).

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details


Product Description

Review

'The best of scholarship ... the most user-friendly of etymological dictionaries' University of Georgia

About the Author

No Bio

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Not happy March 21 2011
By Jack
Format:Hardcover
Having purchased this book a couple of weeks ago I have now looked through it and read many of the entries.

I am not a linguist or a scholar in this field but I was both pleased and disappointed in what I found.

On the positive side I liked reading the entries. They are generally well written in a nice, clean, open style without resorting to obscure, scholarly terms.

On the negative side, despite the obvious depth of knowledge of the writer(s), I sometimes felt a lack of references to Latin and Greek roots which I am used to seeing in a majority of words in any regular etymological dictionary such as the OED or any issues of Chambers. (But I certainly didn't do a sytematic survey to prove or disprove this point.)

But what really upset me was that despite its obviously scholarly approach the coverage is of a Bowdlerised version of the language. I hate this. It isn't like I wish to dwell on these words, such as f*u*c*k and c*u*n*t and q*u*i*m and so on but they are an essential component of the language; they are used every day in word and print; they have a rich heritage worthy of exploration; their absence makes me feel ripped off; it makes me suspicious that other good and useful everyday words have been excluded and it is simply intellectual dishonesty for someone producing an academic work to exclude them. Rude they may be, but real and everyday and worthy of inclusion they certainly are.
Was this review helpful to you?
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Good, but not quite as detailed as Oxford version Sept. 4 2002
Format:Hardcover
I had the chance to compare the Chambers Dictionary of Etymology with the Oxford Dictionary of Etymology, and I have to say that although both books are way ahead of the competition, for me, the Oxford seemed to go into greater depth.
Admittedly, I did not have the time to compare a lot of entries, but the few words I did look up showed a pattern that was hard to dismiss. In all of the cases that I saw, the Oxford dictionary included much more of the history of the word and often went back to the Latin root as well as proposing possible alternate developments of the word. The Chambers dictionary, on the other hand, tended to trace a more linear path and often only went as far back as the Old English or Old French root.
While the Chambers Dictionary of Etymology is a very clear and concise work, I feel the Oxford Dictionary of Etymology has a slight advantage in precision and depth. I must add that although the Oxford beats out the Chambers dictionary in regard to etymology, Chambers has the advantage when it comes to quotations. I find that the Chambers Dictionary of Quotations is better than Oxford's equivalent work.
Was this review helpful to you?
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Chambers reads well, but no cigar Nov. 15 2002
Format:Hardcover
I bought the Chambers Dictionary of Etymology, largely based on reviews posted here. While I love the 'prose' style of word origin discussions, there has scarcely been a time the book has proved useful. The fact is, Eric Partridge's "Origins" : a Short Etymological Dictionary of Modern English" surpasses Chambers on a daily basis for my purposes. It goes deeper, gives you a wealth of threads for further investigation and contains some spicy asides regarding other distionaries. That one needs to familiarize oneself with abbreviations is simply no objection.
My view is : by-pass Chambers and get a real etymological dictionary. You will never regret it. I have a pristine copy of Chambers for sale should you incline to the contrary.
Was this review helpful to you?
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars No better than a good dictionary. July 17 2004
By Big Red
Format:Hardcover
To my surprise I found this book to be no better than my 50 year old Webster Collegiate Dictionary. About the same number of roots, similarly presented.
Was this review helpful to you?
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Chambers dictionary of Etymolgy Nov. 13 2002
Format:Hardcover
Chambers Dictionary of Etymology is not a purchase I am glad to have made. I read the other submitted reviews and felt encouraged. But after using the book through a month of extensive etymological research, I find that the resource is much too thin, although the book is thick with 25,000 entries. The best thing is the prose style which is readable and invites easy access. But, it stops far short of intriguing threads of sense that are crucial for seious research. Where are the Greek and Latin derivatives? Why is there no folksy, learned fancy to touch a pertinent phrase.
At times this book provides, through its discussion like text, a tidbit or two that was of help. On the whole , I have found the much slighter book by Eric Partridge, "Origins:A Short Etymological Dictionery of the Modern English" to be far deeper, richer, more suggestive of pockets of sense, than any other I have used so far.
I bought Chambers to save money. Now I wish I had gone for something else, the Oxford, for example. Partridge outstrips Chambers at every turn. Having to learn abbbreviations is no objection : it takes a mere second or two, and the result only better prepare one for more rewarding refernec text usage.
Blain Bovee
Was this review helpful to you?
Want to see more reviews on this item?

Look for similar items by category


Feedback