CDN$ 240.95
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Ships from and sold by Gift-wrap available.
Consumer Health: A Guide ... has been added to your Cart
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Consumer Health: A Guide To Intelligent Decisions Paperback – Mar 5 2012

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
CDN$ 240.95
CDN$ 232.87 CDN$ 232.93

Save an Additional 10% on Textbooks When you Join Amazon Student

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Amazon Student members save an additional 10% on Textbooks with promo code TEXTBOOK10. Enter code TEXTBOOK10 at checkout. Here's how (restrictions apply)

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 576 pages
  • Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education; 9 edition (March 5 2012)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0078028485
  • ISBN-13: 978-0078028489
  • Product Dimensions: 22.4 x 2.3 x 26.9 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 1.1 Kg
  • Average Customer Review: Be the first to review this item
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

About the Author

Stephen Barrett, M.D., has been investigating and writing about consumer health issues for more than 40 years. His Quackwatch website serves as a clearinghouse for information on health frauds and quackery. He serves as Vice President of the Institute for Science and Medicine, is a Fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, edits Consumer Health Digest, and is a peer-review panelist for several top medical journals.

Harriet Hall, M.D., a retired family physician and colonel, served 20 years in the U.S. Air Force. Her administrative positions included Chief of Clinic Services and Director of Base Medical Services. She now devotes her time to investigating questionable health claims and writing and lecturing about pseudoscience, quackery, "alternative medicine," and critical thinking. She is a contributing editor to both Skeptical Inquirer and Skeptic magazines and a founding member and editor of the Science-Based Medicine blog.

Robert S. Baratz, M.D., D.D.S., Ph.D., an expert on quality of care, is President and Medical Director of South Shore Health Care in Braintree, Massachusetts, where he practices internal, oral, and occupational medicine. He serves on the medical faculties of Boston University and Tufts University and is used as a consultant by many regulatory and law enforcement agencies.

William M. London, Ed.D., M.P.H., is a health educator and professor in the Department of Public Health at California State University, Los Angeles. He is also the associate editor of Consumer Health Digest, co-host of the Credential Watch website, and a member of the editorial board of the journal FACT (Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies: An Evidence-Based Approach).

Manfred Kroger, Ph.D., is Professor Emeritus of Food Science and Professor Emeritus of Science, Technology and Society at The Pennsylvania State University, where he has won several teaching awards. He is a science communicator for the Institute of Food Technologists and is scientific editor of its online journal, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. He is also associate editor of the Journal of Food Science and a scientific advisor to the American Council on Science and Health.

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) HASH(0xa02caccc) out of 5 stars 22 reviews
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa02e8018) out of 5 stars This author seemed to have missed his own writing on "biases". Nonsense wrapped up an an academic package. June 23 2015
By Bogdan111 - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This author seems to have missed the portion he wrote about "bias". The entire premise of this diatribe seems to be founded on discrediting anything that is "unscientific". The problem is: just because something is "unscientific" does not make it false. It certainly does not make it true but it is a logical fallacy to base the truthfulness of something on "science". There was not too much pure information (aside from definitions and information about organizations) but rather the book seemed to serve as a pamphlet set out to discredit anything this author did not like.
HASH(0xa02e8444) out of 5 stars Outdated science and flawed logic Feb. 4 2016
By Theo Dee - Published on
Format: Paperback
Stephen Barrett falls short of his own standards in that his arguments are heavily laden with bias, as opposed to objectivity. His knowledge is based on outdated science and information, which further demonstrates that he has stagnated in the very field that he purportedly considers himself an expert. There are not enough redeeming qualities from this book, so I suggest you look elsewhere if you are truly interested in your own personal health.
12 of 19 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa02e8498) out of 5 stars Biased!!!! Aug. 7 2012
By ANGELA - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
As a pharmacy professional of twenty years, I am shocked at how this book makes drug companies and insurance companies out to be the hero, while making any vitamin supplements or alternative medicine therapies out to be dangerous and seedy. The irony is one can be turned off to even looking into herbal medicine, while saying the FDA is always protecting the consumer. How often does the FDA let bacteria-ridden food into the marketplace, while saying vitamins are completely useless? Does America eat in a way that ensures we are taking in proper vitamins, and eating properly on their own? Yes, that explains the low vitamin D levels, obesity, and recurrence of disease...This book is a joke. I complained to my professor that is was bought and paid for by the drug companies, and she agreed and pulled it out of the curriculum....NO JOKE. Don't bother reading this crap, late night info
mercials give better quality health advice.
8 of 13 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa02e8564) out of 5 stars A science-based aid to clear thinking Dec 23 2013
By Sam Hill - Published on
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
For the consumer (such as I) lacking knowledge in medical matters and perplexed, as I have been, by the question of how to assess the current avalanche of health claims and supplements on the internet, in health food shops, in pharmacies and in print, this book is a must-read.

Similar to Dr. Paul Offit's off-putting experience with today's health-care system that he describes in the prologue to his Do You Believe in Magic?: The Sense and Nonsense of Alternative Medicine, my own experience with standard medecine in the past 20-odd years has been likewise a very mixed bag. I have twice faced cancer and survived by submitting to the standard treatments: once for colorectal cancer (stage 3) which meant surgery, chemo, and radiation - the infamous "cut, burn, poison" trilogy - and once for bladder cancer: surgery and chemo. Survive I did; but those remedies came with almost intolerable side effects that made me indifferent, for a time, as to whether I lived or died.

Should some other illness afflict me once more in the future, is there not, I wondered, a way to restored health that's not as brutal? Can there be therapies through unconventional medicine that are gentler, more bearable, but achieve the same objective?

Apparently not. Reading this book taught me this reality: _all_ therapies, not only the conventional "allopathic" ones that we love to hate, must necessarily be held to the same high standard of proof, the test of science, failing which -- to borrow Offit's words -- we'll be hoodwinked at a point in life when we are sick and most vulnerable, by healers who ask us to believe in them rather than in the science that fails to support their claims.

The book "Consumer Health" lists those failures. Is that an instance of "bias", as some commenters have charged? Indeed yes, it _is_ bias, and it is a good and responsible thing, this bias, because it is bias against health care providers telling patients things that are not true, presenting opinions as if they were facts. That bias is a precious service to the public.

I find the book to be a science-based aid that treats of these matters in some detail and helps to classify for the consumer's own protection the huge assortment of healing promotions modalities and nostrums that fall into the scientifically failed category that may alternatively be designated as wishful or magic thinking.

Bottom line: if you value your health, read this book.
10 of 16 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0xa02e875c) out of 5 stars Biased and outdated sources Oct. 5 2012
By Kate Bauer - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This book uses sources all the way from the 1950's. This book touts doing critical thinking and applying scientific research, but fails to critique itself. When doing research on anything science or medical related, you always want to have the newest sources possible. Practices that are done or endorsed by the Mayo Clinic are labelled as not scientific, yet lists the Mayo Clinic as a reliable source. It is clear that many things were deliberately omitted, or badly researched with outdated sources to prove the authors' point. When this is done, it is a red flag of biased writing. Reports that were generated over half a century ago, are probably not the best thing to use. It does give some decent advice, like pick a doctor that is licensed, but this is supposed to be a book about making intelligent decisions based on scientific research. This book did not make an intelligent decision regarding many of it's research practices. I expected to find much better from this book. I found more credible research from more relevant data, by reputable sources, in five minutes of bing searches; than I have have seen in this book.