Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Conversations with William H. Gass [Paperback]

William H. Gass , Theodore G. Ammon

List Price: CDN$ 24.56
Price: CDN$ 21.56 & FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details
You Save: CDN$ 3.00 (12%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we ship the item.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback CDN $21.56  
Join Amazon Student in Canada


Book Description

June 16 2003 Literary Conversations
Biography -- Literary Criticism

"Conversations with William H. Gass" captures the imagination and philosophical acumen of one of America's most important aestheticians, critical theorists, fiction writers, and essayists.

From his first major novel, "Omensetter's Luck" (1966), to his numerous collections of essays and philosophical inquiries, to his controversial novel "The Tunnel" (1995), Gass (b. 1924) has proved himself a meticulous craftsman. Throughout these interviews, he reveals an aesthetic that combines ideas from sources as disparate as Ludwig Wittgenstein, Rainer Maria Rilke, Gertrude Stein, and Plato.

The interviews make clear the unity behind Gass's views is by his own design. "Conversations" retrace his undergraduate years at Kenyon College and his subsequent philosophical investigation of metaphor at Cornell University.

Gass has never strayed from his belief that metaphor is central and fundamental to thought and to aesthetics. In these interviews he reiterates time and again his belief that the ultimate understanding of the relationship of language to the world pivots on one's understanding of metaphor.

In interviews, in profiles, and in his own essays, Gass does not hide from questions about his art and personal motivations, no matter how frequently they are asked, nor does he toy with his interviewers. Revealing how he never shies from an intellectual joust, this collection includes a rousing, contentious debate with John Gardner, fellow literary pundit and fiction writer.

The distinction of Gass's prose is matched by the clarity and brilliance of the mind behind it. These talks allow an unobstructed view. Anyone interested in Gass's writing will delight in hearing the brutally honest voice of the mind that produced it.

Theodore G. Ammon is chair of the philosophy department at Millsaps College in Jackson, Miss. His work has appeared in such publications as "Romance Notes," "Arachne," "College Mathematics," and the "Journal of Aesthetic Education."


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details

  • Paperback: 175 pages
  • Publisher: Univ Pr of Mississippi (Trd) (June 16 2003)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 157806547X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1578065479
  • Product Dimensions: 23.2 x 15.2 x 1.5 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 295 g
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #1,785,147 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
Most philosophers don't write fiction. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 3.0 out of 5 stars  1 review
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Following the Word Into the World Oct. 22 2004
By Peter F Cook - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback
When I first saw the book "Conversations with William Gass," I was excited-Gass has always fascinated me, both for his byzantine but flawlessly-executed prose, and for the marginalized place he occupies in belles letters next to his more-recognized peers (John Barth, Thomas Pynchon, et al.). Now, I thought, I would finally have the opportunity to bore into his tightly-guarded head, to worm my way under his notoriously-thick skin-the literary voyeur in me was nearly slavering at the prospect. Slavering, that was, until I read the table of contents and realized that a more apt title would have been "Collected Interviews With William Gass."

The closest "Conversations" comes to providing a real conversation is in "William Gass and John Gardner: A Debate on Fiction." This piece is by far the most interesting in the book, pitting Gass against his long-term acquaintance/friend/mentor/nemesis (depending on whom one asks). The subject of their debate is the moral responsibility of the author; Gardner is a staunch defender of the need for fiction to tackle real-life ethical questions, while Gass believes that the only moral obligation a writer (or any artist) has is to the beauty of his or her creation. This is good stuff-some of Gass's more particular theories of writing (e.g., the necessity of anger for an author, the importance of a text modifying its reader in much the way one object in a metaphor modifies the other) are brought into sharp focus when he is up against an antagonistic and well-spoken interlocutor.

The only other truly bright spot in the book is Thomas LeClair's interview for The Paris Review. LeClair, rather than attempting to demonstrate his smarts or spark an argument, asks terse, considered questions-Gass responds at length, and elegantly, and the topics covered are well-chosen (from Gass's reaction to contemporary linguistic philosophy and meeting Wittgenstein, to his dislike of Nabokov for being too clever (a strange critique from Gass)). The interview has an air of having been written, but if it is it's to LeClair's credit, for it would stand to reason that Gass would have more faith in his pen than his tongue.

Aside from these two pieces, the book just doesn't deliver. Every other entry is an interview struggling to become a conversation (perhaps like those falsely promised in the title). The difference between interview and conversation is very simple: in a conversation each participant should be equally represented. An interview is about the interviewee-unfortunately, the majority of the interviewers in this book seem to think the interview is at least half about them. Usually it doesn't take much of their obsequiousness or facile rambling to silence Gass.

Some of the interviewers are downright embarrassing, particularly the hapless Jo Brans, the length of whose questions rivals the length of Gass's answers. While talking about Gass's over/use of sexual metaphors, she breaks in with "I'm being very fancy, but I wondered if your using them (sexual images) had something to do with the generation of the fictional word" (108). Even the normally-charitable Gass is frustrated by this brand of blundering self-aggrandizement, and curtly responds with a "It's basic...." Then, just in case Gass misunderstood her oh-so-clever posturing, Brans follows up with "I'm not really accusing you of having a dirty mind or anything." "Oh, I do...," Gass assures hers. That he doesn't resort to this brand of prickliness more often speaks a great deal for Gass's patience. The majority of the interviewers (including Theodore Ammon, the editor of the compilation) have the conception that the more they are talking, the better the "conversation" actually is. The sad truth, as an impartial observer, is that they just aren't as interesting as Gass.

Why Ammon chose some of these pieces over other, far better ones (for instance, a real conversation between Gass, Donald Barthelme, and others (it can be found in Donald Barthelme's "Not-Knowing") the inclusion of which in the place of, say, Ammon's own clumsy interview, would have greatly improved the compilation) is a mystery. Also mysterious is why he didn't invest in some proper proofreaders. The book abounds in groan-worthy errors, from consistently mysterious comma placement "You are, very interested in architecture" (65), gross usage blunders: "For sometime (my italics) now you have been..."(ibid), and rampant typos (my favorite being: "Solipsism is one of the risks of the letter `L' ..."(26)). I'd feel more charitably toward these blunders if they weren't so emblematic of the lack of care and time spent on all facets of this book.

Misnamed and poorly edited as it is, "Conversations With William Gass" speaks to a genuine desire in most readers. When we approach a book we often want to get to the author behind the text, to somehow dig through all the words and get some sort of privileged insight into what he or she really thinks. The lesson in "Conversations With William Gass," a lesson Gass would likely heartily endorse, is that attempts to get inside the author invariably result in something less interesting than the author's actual work.

Look for similar items by category


Feedback