Cradle Paperback – 1989
|New from||Used from|
No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.
To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.
About the Author
Arthur C. Clarke was born in Minehead in 1917. During the Second World War he served as a radar instructor for the RAF, rising to the rank of flight-lieutenant. After the war, he entered King's college, London taking, in 1948, his Bsc in physics and mathematics with first class honours.One of the most respected of all science-fiction writers, he has won Kalinga Prize, the Aviation Space-Writers' Prize and the Westinghouse Science Writing Prize. He also shared an Oscar nomination with Stanley Kubrick for the screenplay of 2001: A Space Odyssey, which was based on his story, 'The Sentinel'. He has lived in Sri Lanka since 1956. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
Top Customer Reviews
The book could be easily described as RAMA doing the work of the Overlords from CHILDHOOD'S END. An unmanned probe comes to Earth to elevate the human species and restore a number of others. This plan is stumbled across by a reporter looking into the alleged disappearance of a secret Navy missile. The probe is making a journey to a dozen planet. At each planet it will assemble life forms based on specimens collected on an earlier visit. In CRADLE, a couple of humans get a chance to tell the aliens that we don't want humans to be elevated. That's pretty much it.
I had a hard time getting through this book. I normally fly through Clarke's books but this one was just bogged down in unnecessary details. This book also contained a large number of sexual scenes that I have to assume were the work of Lee as I have not encountered their like in Clarke's work. I really cannot recommend this book to anyone, so if you haven't read it and were considering it I have to give you fair warning.
Frankly, it is inferior to the Rama series. The plot mostly focusses on a reporter trying to find a test missile she suspects was lost on a test flight. The navy, naturally, wants to prevent word of this leaking out, so are also searching for the missile. One of the absurdities of the book is that the reporter finds the missile site so easily when the navy has been looking for weeks (?) with more resources and information. There are similar absurdities throughout the book. In addition, the characters are laughably 2-dimensional, all defined by some life-altering mental or physical trauma that took place years before. Thirdly and most annoyingly, great detail is taken to explain the details of alien manufacture without telling the reader what they are assembling, so the reader must wade through 4 pages of alien automatons attaching sticks together to discover that they are building an antenna. It's really trying on the reader's patience!
And yet I couldn't help but enjoy the book. The pacing is quick, the writing is usually loose and flowing (with the exception noted above), and it's an easy read. It's not nearly as good as the Rama series, but more enjoyable than much of what's out there in science fiction.
The beginning vignette about the "zoo craft" was, IMHO, written moderately well, but as soon as Carol comes on the scene, it gets very, well, amatuerish. I even went back and reviewed the Rama books, thinking that maybe I had read them so long ago that maybe they [were bad] then, but no, alas, they were (mostly) well constructed plots, with characters with whom I could relate, and relatively few confusing sections. Rama (original) did seem quite different from the others, but that made sense, since Clarke did the original in 1979 (or so, I think), and Lee came on with Rama II.
The opening vignette in Cradle seemed as if it were written by a totally different author, then shipped across the sea to another author who finished the rest of the book.
Then, it dawned on me, Cradle was either a) Written by an amateur author (Gentry Lee), with very little involvement with Clarke, or b) written by an entirely different author than the Rama series, again with little Clarke influence.
The constant switching "mindpoints" (where in one paragraph you hear what Carol is thinking, then the very next sentence you hear what Nick is thinking) is a typical early "learning writer" syndrome. There is a lot of "telling" instead of "showing". The plot points are haphazardly structured throughout, with interesting tidbits thrown in here and there without an uberpurpose. I felt throughout the whole novel that it might not go anywhere, and sho-nuff, it really didn't.
In the Rama II and beyond series, these problems are significantly improved, and show levels of improvement over the evolution of the series.Read more ›
The problem lies not in description or character interest but in plot and setting. The whole alien business which is supposedly the subject of the book gets pushed to one side by long soap-opera stories about the pasts of the characters, some of whom actually do virtually nothing to affect the main story (e.g. the naval commander, who turns up at the end after taking little or no active role up till then and suddenly gets made to feel good about himself again).Between them, the human characters must have just about every emotional problem known to man! Also, nearly everything to do with the alien ship is obvious to the reader but not to the characters by about halfway throughthanks to the chapters about the aliens, and the one major thing not revealed gets sorted out no problem by the characters after a quick bit of soul-searching. Actually, I have just realised that the whole story resembles nothing more than one of the duller episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation. Finally, an interesting plotline - the message to the aliens from "Power #2" - is not developed at all.
The setting of the novel in the very near future also denies Clarke the chance to use one of his greatest skills - the projection of humankind's future development. This is usually the best aspect of his books and is totally lacking here.
Clarke and Lee can do considerably better than this. I have read another of their collaborations, Rama II, which also puts a strong emphasis on character description, but not nearly so much at the expense of plot.
If you want to read some good revelatory Clarke material, I would recommend Childhood's End, which is a really ingenious work. Cradle, I am afraid, falls well below his usual standards.
Most recent customer reviews
It's Arthur C. Clarke!!! I think I've read 99% of his works and have yet to find one that I did not like/love. The man was a GEM!Published 19 months ago by Renate D
This novel is definitely not the best work out of the collaboritive efforts of Gentry Lee and Arthur Clarke, but it's still a pretty good novel. Read morePublished on July 6 2000 by William M. Rand
This book is a must read if you love science fiction or if you love reading in general. If you like plot twists, comedy, and adventure you have it all in one book. Read morePublished on April 20 2000
It has been a number of years since I read any science fiction, so I decided to play it safe and pick up something by an author with a long and outstanding track record. Read morePublished on April 17 2000 by LeesKeys
This book does not do justice to Clarke
I don't recommend this book I thought it was boring. The content of science fiction was so low it can hardly be classified as science... Read more
Overall I don't think this is some amazing book, but it was a really fast, fun, and quick read. I must have read the book in 2 hours, and found it to be quite fun to get into the... Read morePublished on Feb. 22 2000 by Erik Johnson
This is one of the stupidest books I have ever read, and I have read hundreds of science fiction novels. Read morePublished on Nov. 29 1999 by Robert Steimle
I generally love Arthur C. Clarke, but I have never felt a book I paid for was so worthless.
This book is far more about character development poorly done than the normal... Read more