No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.

Digital List Price: CDN$ 23.99
Kindle Price: CDN$ 14.39

Save CDN$ 9.60 (40%)

includes free international wireless delivery via Amazon Whispernet

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Flip to back Flip to front
Audible Narration Playing... Paused   You are listening to a sample of the Audible narration for this Kindle book.
Learn more

Crossing Hitler: The Man Who Put the Nazis on the Witness Stand Kindle Edition

3 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
CDN$ 14.39

Length: 371 pages Word Wise: Enabled Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Kindle Featured Deals
Browse Kindle featured deals from our publishers. See more.

Product Description

Product Description

During a 1931 trial of four Nazi stormtroopers, known as the Eden Dance Palace trial, Hans Litten grilled Hitler in a brilliant and merciless three-hour cross-examination, forcing him into multiple contradictions and evasions and finally reducing him to helpless and humiliating rage (the transcription of Hitler's full testimony is included.) At the time, Hitler was still trying to prove his embrace of legal methods, and distancing himself from his stormtroopers. The courageous Litten revealed his true intentions, and in the process, posed a real threat to Nazi ambition.
When the Nazis seized power two years after the trial, friends and family urged Litten to flee the country. He stayed and was sent to the concentration camps, where he worked on translations of medieval German poetry, shared the money and food he was sent by his wealthy family, and taught working-class inmates about art and literature. When Jewish prisoners at Dachau were locked in their barracks for weeks at a time, Litten kept them sane by reciting great works from memory. After five years of torture and hard labor-and a daring escape that failed-Litten gave up hope of survival. His story was ultimately tragic but, as Benjamin Hett writes in this gripping narrative, it is also redemptive. "It is a story of human nobility in the face of barbarism."
The first full-length biography of Litten, the book also explores the turbulent years of the Weimar Republic and the terror of Nazi rule in Germany after 1933. [in sidebar] Winner of the 2007 Fraenkel Prize for outstanding work of contemporary history, in manuscript. To be published throughout the world.

Product Details

  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • File Size: 2121 KB
  • Print Length: 371 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press; 1 edition (Sept. 11 2008)
  • Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B001FX850I
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Word Wise: Enabled
  • Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #907,378 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images or tell us about a lower price?

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover
This is a biography of Hans Litten (1903-1938), a talented German lawyer and a fierce opponent of Nazism during its rise to power. His greatest success came in 1931 when he forced Adolf Hitler to give testimony at the Eden Dance Palace trial of four of the party's storm troopers, who were charged with attempted murder. At that time Hitler was playing a dangerous double-game, trying to convince Germans that his party intended to gain power only by legal means, while at the same time placating party members who wanted violent action. Much of the trial revolved around whether the party covertly approved of "rollo commandos," a term from the front lines of World War I that had come to refer to small groups of men whose task was to kill party opponents.

Few historians have mentioned Hans Litten. Ingo Müller's Hitler's Justice makes no mention of him, nor does Louis Snyder's Hitler's German Enemies, or Peter Hoffmann's 847-page The History of the German Resistance 1933-1945. And despite the fury Litten provoked in Hitler, he isn't in the index of John Toland's two-volume biography, Adolf Hitler. In English, the only biography of him before this was by his mother, Irmgard Litten (A Mother Fights Hitler in UK, Beyond Tears in the US).

Why has one of Hitler's boldest early opponents been so woefully neglected? First, Litten was arrested just after the Reichstag fire, less than a month after Hitler took power, so virtually all his opposition to Hitler came during the rise to power, when opposition to Hitler was safer and more common. Confined to prison until his death by suicide in early 1938, he never had a chance to voice opposition to the regime. That's precisely what Hitler intended.
Read more ›
One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) HASH(0x9d9a8a2c) out of 5 stars 47 reviews
31 of 33 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9d9cf6fc) out of 5 stars Insightful Study of Hans Litten and the German Legal System of 1930s in Turmoil. Oct. 29 2008
By mirasreviews - Published on
Format: Hardcover Vine Customer Review of Free Product
"Crossing Hitler: The Man Who Put the Nazis on the Witness Stand" is a biography of Hans Litten, a crusading German lawyer whose life ended prematurely at Dachau concentration camp in 1938, seven years after he pressed Adolf Hitler into a fit of rage on the witness stand at the Eden Dance Palace Trial. A recent revival in interest and regard for Litten in Germany has led to some sanitizing of his character and politics, which author Benjamin Carter Hett attempts to dispel. He presents a picture of a complex and radical man, a champion of the downtrodden, intolerant and inflexible, anti-Weimar Republic, anti-Nazi, anti-democratic, sympathetic to Communists but not one of them, who believed in the law, which he used to advance social and political consciousness in the volatile last years of the Weimar Republic.

Hett doesn't dedicate much space to Litten's personal life, if, indeed, he had a personal life. He was an obsessive man for whom everything revolved around the goals he pursued in the courtroom. There is detailed coverage of Litten's role and Hitler's difficulty in the 1931 Eden Dance Palace Trial in which four Nazi stormtroopers were accused of the attempted murder of three people at a Berlin party, a trial that may have sealed Litten's fate years hence. A year later, Litten was expelled from court for politicizing another trial of Nazi stormtroopers, this time for a violent clash with the communist Combat League Against Fascism. The book then follows Litten's movement through a series of prisons and concentration camps as a political prisoner after he was arrested in 1933.

Hans Litten is an interesting, if not likeable, man who had an important career at a pivotal time and place in history. But I found "Crossing Hitler" most illuminating when discussing the legal climate in Germany in the years just before and after the Nazi party came to power. The author goes beyond the idea that the Weimar judicial system was simply soft on the political right to present a broader picture of a varied legal system that was in the throes of upheaval in the early 1930s, yet managing still to function. The tireless efforts of Hans Litten's friends Max and Margot Furst and his mother Irmgard to free him from prison reveal a bureaucracy in the grasp of Nazi power but not yet entirely subdued by it. "Crossing Hitler" is an insightful and sometimes eloquent look at how a legal system behaved in the midst of political turmoil, through he experiences of a revolutionary lawyer.
16 of 17 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9d9dc0cc) out of 5 stars A somewhat heavy, but well researched biography of Hans Litten Oct. 24 2008
By Amazon Customer - Published on
Format: Hardcover Vine Customer Review of Free Product
To be honest, I usually read fiction, especially sci-fi/fantasy and occasionally thrillers with WWII links (Enigma, Black Cross, The Shadowman). Enigma was a work of pure fiction, based on the premise that the Third Reich had expanded, survived and become a permanent fixture on the European landscape.

My apologies for mentioning another book. However, the reason why I do so, is because Crossing Hitler is a biography of Hans Litten, who put Hitler on the witness stand in the Eden Dance Palace trial of 1931. What few realize is that Litten's questions had the potential to cause Hitler to pejure himself (thus throwing him in jail) and fracture the Nazi party. Indeed, it takes little imagination for an "alternative history" sci-fi reader such as I, to wonder what would have happened if such a thing had come to pass? How many lives would have been spared? How much destruction avoided? How different would the world now be?

This is the concept that intrigued me into deviating into the realm of non-fiction.

The book really delves into Hans Litten's personality, beliefs and motivations. It looks closely at his life both from childhood right up to his death in Dachau concentration camp - the ultimate price paid for humiliating Hitler. Likewise, it looks closely at those who surrounded Litten, and the consequences of their association with him. To give him credit, Hett (the author) did a fantastic amount of research for the book, basing the arguments he provides largely on documented historical fact, backing it up with notes at the end citing the exact references.

Likewise, while the author clearly is familiar with other biographies of Hans Litten, he strives to fully understand this brave lawyer and uses historical facts to justify his views.

Personally, I found the book rather heavy, and would have enjoyed it more if more time had been devoted to Hitler's time on the witness stand.

In all, though, I recommend this well researched book.
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9d9cfb7c) out of 5 stars Cross examining the madness of the Nazi party Oct. 28 2008
By Wayne Klein - Published on
Format: Hardcover Vine Customer Review of Free Product
In 1931 the Nazi party hadn't gained complete control of Germany and Hitler's mad shadow hadn't begun to complete plunge Germany in darkness. Han Litten had the Nazi party on the stand when four of Nazi stormtroopers were accused and tried for attempted murder and assault. Litten did what would in retrospect be unthinkable by many people--he put Hitler on the stand. Hitler desperately sought the support of the German middle class and decided to distance himself from some of the more extreme behavior from the Nazi party. Hitler wanted to be seen as someone who was using the political and legal system properly to deal with issues within his party and outside of it. Litten knew differently. The prosecuting attorney called proceded to grill Hitler on the stand about his association with the Nazi party, what he knew and condoned managing to make the future Furher furious with Litten. Bravery has its cost even when we don't see the outcome of our actions or others.

Litten who esposed left wing political causes and embraced his Jewish heritage found himself in constant conflict with the Nazi party and what they were attempting to do in Germany. The result once Hitler took power was that Litten was thrown into Dachau first as a political prisoner and, later, because of he was a Jew. Hitler had Litten tortured, humiliated and tried to defeat him. All the while Litten held on to the knowledge of that he was on the side of right and that eventually Hitler would get his due.

A fascinating biography, Crossing Hitler is well researched and written by Benjamin Carter Hett. Hett knows his history--he is an Associate Professor of History at Hunter College and also knows the law having practiced as a former trial lawyer. His background gives us unique insight into Germany just as the country was turning the corner from the devestation of the first World War only to be plunged into darkness by the Hitler and the Nazi party. The only flaw with the book is that sometimes Hett lets the pacing lag a bit. Given that this book operates as both biography and history focusing on the trial where Litten put Hitler on the stand, I expected the book to open with that trial and work in details backwards from there. Perhaps it was my expectation but a chronological detailed account of Litten's life while important should have been bookended by the trial and its aftermath. To Hett's credit, he isn't pedantic and his style immediately involves you in the events he describes.

Hett gives us a unique portrait of Litten through interviews and correspondence that reveals a complex man who while a hero could be every bit as human and frail as you or me. Once the moment of bravery has past, it's how you deal with the consequences of that bravery that gives us a sense of the character. This is an extremely well written book that despite some minor flaws should be read particularly by those who felt that all Germans didn't oppose Hitler, the Nazi party and their transformation of Germany from a rising nation to a butcher shop that tore apart the country as it needlessly took human lives.
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9d9dc4f8) out of 5 stars Book good; subject overrated? Jan. 10 2011
By N. Perz - Published on
The first thing you should know: the actual trial where Hitler was cross-examined is only a tiny part of the book. CH is both a biography of Hans Litten and a book about the general state of the legal system in Germany during the 1930s. the book is well written and thoroughly researched. I find myself wondering, however, if the subject isn't a bit over-rated.

All I know about Hans Litten is what was in this book but he doesn't strike me as a particularly "heroic" figure. If fact, he comes off as being rather neurotic and self-absorbed. He was a radical lawyer who's first concern was his obsessive pursuit of his own private ideological agenda. I don't see how he was this great enemy of Nazism (at least, no more so than the many other brave people who resisted the slide into Fascism). What happened to him was very sad but, again, how many thousands of other Germans found themselves suffering the same fate?

On the one hand, all the victims should be honored and remembered; on the other hand, I don't see how Litten was so special. I suspect his quasi-fame is more about myth-making than about historical fact. But for the fact that Litten happened to cross-examine Hitler in some relatively minor case in the early 1930s, I doubt that anyone would have ever heard of him. He's famous by a happenstance.

Anyway, the book is pretty good and worth reading if you have any interest in the time-period.

20 of 26 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9d9dc144) out of 5 stars Defying Political Correctness: "Crossing Hitler" Is NOT History, But A Poorly Written Biography Oct. 16 2008
By Dr. Karl O. Edwards - Published on
Format: Hardcover Vine Customer Review of Free Product
In preparing this third review of "Crossing Hitler" for approval, it has dawned on me that I may be stepping on toes because of the topics covered it the book: Adolph Hitler, the rise of the Nazi party, antisemitism, and Nazi concentration camps. Please let me assure you that this is not my intention: my evaluation of the "Crossing Hitler" is based upon the book's writing style, historicism, functionality, and enjoyability of reading. That is, I am not giving "Crossing Hitler" a two star review because I disagree with the opinions and political realities discussed in the book, but rather I am giving "Crossing Hitler" a two star review because of (in my opinion) the poor writing style, the questionable historical significance, the lack of relevance, and the boring reading experience. More to the point, if I had not already gotten (as part of the Vine program) and read "Crossing Hitler," I would have appreciated a review that explained who might find the book interesting and, more importantly, what problems existed with the book (even, if such a review was contrary or in defiance to other reviews). If there had been a review that laid out the academic and other problems with the book, I would never had bothered to read "Crossing Hitler." To this end, I am attempting, once again, to write a review that may be helpful to others, yet acceptable to Amazon.

My first two reviews leaned heavily towards explaining the problems I had with the writing style (references, continuity, format, etc.) of "Crossing Hitler." My first review frequently referred to the author (as is done in academic reviews), so I made my comments about the writing style more generalized in the second review, but apparently remained too impersonal, as it was also deemed by Amazon as not abiding by the guidelines they have set out. Therefore, with respect to the writing style of "Crossing Hitler," I will simply state that I found it to be lacking and extremely frustrating. As such, I would think that serious scholars of history would not find this book helpful or interesting. For those who are not concerned with academic rigor, the writing style will most likely be less problematic.

As for the historical significance of "Crossing Hitler," I imagine that this depends upon the readers familiarity of the topic. However, I must emphasize that "Crossing Hitler" IS NOT ABOUT Hans Litten's "cross-examination" of Adolph Hitler as the title and description suggest. Instead, "Crossing Hitler" is a tome about the purported importance of Hans Litten, in part because Hans Litten "had the courage" to call Adolph Hitler to the witness stand. The so called "Hans Litten's Cross-Examination of Adolph Hitler, May 8, 1931," is not a court transcript, but rather a synthesis of the multitude of newspaper articles reporting on the event. The short discussion of the trial in the text of the book, along with this "transcript" (as provided in the appendix), make it clear that the judges, not Hans Litten, did most of the questioning; although the book suggests that Litten "provided" the questions to the judges. As such, in my opinion, "Crossing Hitler" is of no historical significance. And, given that there are other books written that cover the same material, "Crossing Hitler" adds nothing new to the fabric of knowledge (or understanding) of this period in history. On the other hand, if you are unfamiliar with the political environment or with Litten's story, and you don't mind poor writing, "Crossing Hitler" may be of interest to you.

Perhaps a more important question--indeed, for me--is the relevance or functionality of "Crossing Hitler." When I opted for the book, I was assuming that the book contained actual court transcripts and would rely upon other primary documents such as letters, briefs, summations, even memoirs, to analyze this rather unique event, and then explain the relevance to the over all rise of the Nazis in Germany. However, there are, apparently, no primary sources pertaining to the "cross-examination" of Hitler, and the book makes no effort--as I see it--to explain the importance of the "cross-examination." Rather, the book attempts to re-tell the story of a "communistic," "aristocratic," "anti-Nazi" attorney who spent his short career primarily "defending" poor, communist party affiliated criminals. As far as I am concerned, "Crossing Hitler" is a biography of a historically insignificant man, Hans Litten, whose only "claim to fame" is that during one of his "defenses" he was able to convince the criminal court of Berlin to call Adolph Hitler to the stand. This is not to say that this event is not relevant, but rather that the book, "Crossing Hitler," fails to demonstrate its relevancy. Hence, I would imagine that "Crossing Hitler" would appeal to readers interested primarily in biographies of "lesser" known individuals, or to readers looking for a soft core, specialized version of German politics prior to World War II.

For these reasons, and others (which I had in my first two drafts), I found reading "Crossing Hitler" to be anything but enjoyable, interesting, or enlightening. In fact, the only reason I have given the book two stars is because the "Epilogue," the only interesting part of the book, provides information about earlier--yes, this book is NOT the first book on the subject (Litten's mother and friends started writing books in the late 1930s)--works on Hans Litten and events not discussed in detail that have led to admiration of Hans Litten among German attorneys. If you are looking for biographical accounts of this time period--or of Litten, himself--I would suggest the potential reader seek out other books.

If you would like to see my second review of this book (I did not save the first), which details stylistic, academic, and other problems with "Crossing Hitler," please contact me and I would be happy to send you a copy. Also, if you are having problems finding other books I allude to above, I can let you know which ones are available on Amazon; (I also included them in my other reviews).

As always, if this review was not helpful to you, I would appreciate learning the reason(s) so I can improve my reviews. My goal is to provide help to potential buyers, not get into any arguments. So, if you only disagree with my opinion, could you please say so in the comments and not indicate that the review was not helpful. Thanks.