Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution: Amazon.ca: Michael J. Behe: Books

Inside This Book (Learn More)

First Sentence
This book is about an idea-Darwinian evolution-that is being pushed to its limits by discoveries in biochemistry. Read the first page

Explore More
Concordance

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

(What's this?)

Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)

evolution(15)

biology(10)

science(9)

dawkins(10)

richard dawkins(8)

nature(7)

darwin(6)

education(4)

philosophy(2)

humanist(2)

Customer Reviews

431 Reviews

5 star:		(187)
4 star:		(55)
3 star:		(52)
2 star:		(38)
1 star:		(99)

Average Customer Review

3.4 out of 5 stars (431 customer reviews)

Share your thoughts with other customers:

Create your own review

Most helpful customer reviews

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful

4.0 out of 5 stars Blasphemies the Evolutionary Dogma, May 7 2004

By

M. Kerezman "philipmarlowe4" (macomb, ok United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)

This review is from: Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (Paperback)

It truly amazing the lengths some "scientific" followers of the prophet Darwin will go attack this book. It seems Evolutionary detractors with all their extended courses in substantive Biology, never acquired even a basic understanding in elementary Logic. Merely attacking Behe and Creationists (of Which Behe is not) as Stupid and calling them repeately is a ad Hominem Argument to be rejected by most basic rules of Logic. I look down at number of reviewer who refer Creationists and I.D as drowning in Stupidity over and over again. They then accuse Behe of coming up with his conclusion in advance and twisting the facts to support his conclusion. This argument is used by every side of an issue in virtually every questian puzzling humanity. In the field of Christian Apologetics, Catholics accuse Protestants of "prooftexting the Bible" (Having a Conclusion beforehand, and then searching for texts to support it) and Protestants in turn accuse Catholics of "prooftexting" the writings of the Early Church Fathers. Both sides accuse each other of prooftexting to support a pre-conceived conclusion. What a surprise! The point is both sides of an issue often accuse the other have a preordianed conclusion. The sheer animosity of hard core evolutionists attacks demonstrates what happens to any one blaspheming their Darwinian Dogmas. It reminds of my College Biology Textbook which begins page one with assumption that Evolution is a undeniable fact - no attempt is ever made to prove its scientific truthfulness to reader being indoctrinated. These Biology textbooks usually assumed early on in textbook before the student has adequate knowledge of Biology to form a reasoned judgment. There never is Chaper in a College Biology textbook called "The Case for Evolution" rather Evolution is mentioned only in passing early on without any formal proof. It is assumed but hardly mentioned in a formal way laying before the reader the nature of the evidence. This reader is not a creationist but always questioned the way Biology textbooks in High School and College assumed a lot without proof. Behe gets right to heart of fundamental flaws within Evolution.

1. Absolutely No Transition Fossils have been found.

2. Complex Systems Non-Functionalism in early stages are eliminated by operation of Natural Selection.

*(ie, Early Organism with Non-Functioning Blood Clotting DIE and do not reproduce sufficiently to survive.

3. The amount of Time necessary for earliest living Cells to evolve from inorganic matter (ie, From Non-Living Goo to the first Living Single Celled Organism) first present on priordial Earth is Mathmatically Impossible according to Mathmiticians who have calculated it.

Behe makes people question the underlying assumptions of a "Theory Taught as infalliable Dogma in Public Edcation" and for that he must be silenced by the Scientific inquistion.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Report abuse

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful

3.0 out of 5 stars A Formidable Challenge to Evolution, Feb 6 2011

By

Bassim Zantout "b" (Windsor,Ontario, Canada) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)

This review is from: Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (Paperback)

Michael Behe's notion of irreducibly complex systems presents a formidable challenge to evolution by natural selection. Behe discusses several such systems: Bombardier Beetle, cilium, flagellum, blood clotting system and the complement cascade which is involved in immunity, as well as the the molecular structure of cells and their various compartments. His idea is very simple, and he makes it even simpler by his mouse trap example. The mouse trap is an irreducibly complex system wherein the absence of one part results in the dysfunction of the rest of the other parts. So, if Darwin's idea of evolution entails piecemeal development by natural selection, how can it account for irreducibly complex systems? In his book "Living with Darwin", the philosopher of science Philip Kitcher admits that the notion of irreducible complexity is a major challenge to Darwinism and evolution. He unsuccessfully puts forward a counterargument. Darwin, as Behe rightly maintains in his book, based his theory on the gross examination of living organism, but recent advances in molecular biology puts his theory of evolution in a very difficult position.

I gave the book three stars just because I thought that it might have been a shorter book. The author spent too much time (Chap 3-7) discussing the different systems. It felt an overkill to me. Those five chapters could have been collapsed into one chapter in which he can briefly disucss those systems. Behe made his thesis very clear just by the example of the mouse trap. However, I didn't have to read those chapters since my background is in the health sciences and I understand the complexity of the different systems he talked about especially the blood clotting and complement systems as well as the cellular production of energy and the cell structure. Still the main thesis is very interesting and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to see how evolution by natural selection could be very plausibly challenged.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Report abuse

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful

5.0 out of 5 stars Darwin's Black Box.Move Over,Mr.Darwin., July 30 2010

By

William Ritching (Little Current ON P0P 1K0 Canada) - See all my reviews

This review is from: DARWIN'S BLACK BOX: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (Hardcover)

Charles Darwin,in his famous book The Origin of The Species,wrote:

If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed,which could not possibly have been formed by numerous,successive,slight modifications,my theory would absolutely break down.

Move over,Mr. Darwin.

Michael J Bede presents a solid treatise supporting Intelligent Design,as he explicates persuausively the Biochemical Challenge to evolution.
Professor Bede has a gift for making the complicated simple.His evidence of Intelligent Design illustrates how unreassonable it is to believe that life developed through evolution.

Illustration 1: The Cilia
Illustration 2: The Eye
Illustration 3: The Bombardier Beetle
Illustration 4: Blood Clotting.

DARWIN'S BLACK BOX is a captivating adventure for readers of every age and persuasion.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Report abuse

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 431 customer reviews on Amazon.ca

Want to see more reviews on this item?

› Go to Amazon.com to see all 645 reviews 3.4 out of 5 stars

Most recent customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Solid argument
As a student of physics and organic chemistry, I found the author's work incredibly defying to the Darwinian approach to Evolution. Read more

Published on Dec 17 2009 by Shane Snider

3.0 out of 5 stars A Biochemist's Theory versus Darwinian Theory
XXXXX

This three part, eleven chapter book, by Professor of Biochemistry Dr. Michael Behe, has the purpose of showing that the Darwinian theory of evolution does not... Read more

Published on Nov 18 2007 by Stephen Pletko