2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
one of the best movies ever made!, Nov 1 2004
i was very sceptical when i heard they were remaking a horror classic and amazing film like Dawn, but then when i senn this i absolutly loved it, new take plus a nod to the origional, and the dvd is great, with lots of extras, a must have for anyone. I have to say if these remakes (TCM and Dawn) are made this good keep em comming!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
awesome horror flick, Oct 27 2004
one of the best remakes ever made along with the Texas Chainsaw Massacre, hey this one had chainsaws in it too. great story, awesome effects, scary as hell and good acting, plus tons of gore (excellent effects) and the make up was perfect, plsu watch for cameos from the origional Dawn Of the Dead cast!! a must have!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
The reason why the zombies can still run........., Jun 26 2004
........is because they've only been dead for a day and their bodies haven't stiffened up completely yet. In the original Dawn of the Dead, zombies had already taken over by the beginning of the movie. The remake, however, shows us the apocalypse from the very beginning. But regardless, zombies that run are far more terrifying and I'm glad the change was made for this movie.
I remember when I first heard of the production of this movie, I, like so many others, had already condemned this to be one of the worst movies of the year. After all, why do a zombie remake? All zombie movies are essentially the same; zombies take over, a group of survivors barricade themselves in some sort of shelter, most end up dying, a few survive. Logic persists that a filmmaker should just do another movie rather than dishonor a classic. Stephen King wrote an interesting article in Entertainment Weekly regarding the Dawn of the Dead remake. He wrote that the original was so shocking because it pushed the limits of what can be shown on film. There was a classic scene, in particular, were a terrified woman runs into the arms of her husband near the beginning of the film. Expecting to be safe from the army of zombies, she then looks up towards his face only to find his expression cold and lifeless. He then takes a huge chunk out of her shoulder. At the time, that was going too far, Stephen King writes. Nowadays, that's no big deal. How could the remake push the envelope like the original did? Most of time, studios won't even try. They'd rather do a lackluster job and cash in on the name. I'm happy to say that the Dawn of the Dead remake has all the elements that made the original so magnificient, as well as pushes the envelope far beyond what any of us expected. That particular scene in the original....now replaced with an eight year old girl, biting into her bewildered father's neck as blood shoots out in streams. An obvious homage to the classic scene in the original, but improving upon it. But it only begins there, this entire movie is non-stop zombie destruction. Some of the most creative uses of gore I've ever seen in a movie. Zombies running down the street get their heads splattered in real time with no editing away and then back to the zombie. A survivor accidently getting sawed in half by a clumsy ally with a chainsaw. A zombie woman giving birth to a zombie baby and much, much more. In my humble opinion, this surpasses the original in every single aspect imaginable. Not only should remakes be this good, but ALL horror movies should be done like this. This, people, is how it's done.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No