Day: A Novel and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Day: A Novel on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Day [Paperback]

Elie Wiesel

Price: CDN$ 9.95 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Usually ships within 3 to 4 weeks.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition --  
Paperback CDN $9.95  
Audio, CD --  

Book Description

Mar 21 2006
"Not since Albert Camus has there been such an eloquent spokesman for man." --The New York Times Book Review

The publication of Day restores Elie Wiesel's original title to the novel initially published in English as The Accident and clearly establishes it as the powerful conclusion to the author's classic trilogy of Holocaust literature, which includes his memoir Night and novel Dawn. "In Night it is the 'I' who speaks," writes Wiesel. "In the other two, it is the 'I' who listens and questions."

In its opening paragraphs, a successful journalist and Holocaust survivor steps off a New York City curb and into the path of an oncoming taxi. Consequently, most of Wiesel's masterful portrayal of one man's exploration of the historical tragedy that befell him, his family, and his people transpires in the thoughts, daydreams, and memories of the novel's narrator. Torn between choosing life or death, Day again and again returns to the guiding questions that inform Wiesel's trilogy: the meaning and worth of surviving the annihilation of a race, the effects of the Holocaust upon the modern character of the Jewish people, and the loss of one's religious faith in the face of mass murder and human extermination.

Frequently Bought Together

Day + Dawn + Night
Price For All Three: CDN$ 29.67

Some of these items ship sooner than the others. Show details

  • Usually ships within 3 to 4 weeks.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details

  • Dawn CDN$ 9.86

    Usually ships within 3 to 5 weeks.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details

  • Night CDN$ 9.86

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25. Details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details


Product Description

About the Author

Elie Wiesel is the author of more than fifty books, including Night, his harrowing account of his experiences in Nazi concentration camps. The book, first published in 1955, was selected for Oprah’s Book Club in 2006. Wiesel is Andrew W. Mellon Professor in the Humanities at Boston University, and lives with his family in New York City. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

DAY (Begin Reading)

THE ACCIDENT occurred on an evening in July, right in the heart of New York, as Kathleen and I were crossing the street to go to see the movie The Brothers Karamazov.

The heat was heavy, suffocating: it penetrated your bones, your veins, your lungs. It was difficult to speak, even to breathe. Everything was covered with an enormous, wet sheet of air. The heat stuck to your skin, like a curse.

People walked clumsily, looking haggard, their mouths dry like the mouths of old men watching the decay of their existence; old men hoping to take leave of their own beings so as not to go mad. Their bodies filled them with disgust.

I was tired. I had just finished my work: a five-hundred-word cable. Five hundred words to say nothing. To cover up another empty day. It was one of those quiet and monotonous Sundays that leave no mark on time. Washington: nothing. United Nations: nothing. New York: nothing. Even Hollywood said: nothing. The movie stars had deserted the news.

It wasn’t easy to use five hundred words to say that there was nothing to say. After two hours of hard work, I was exhausted.

“What shall we do now?” Kathleen asked.

“Whatever you like,” I answered.

We were on the corner of Forty-fifth Street, right in front of the Sheraton-Astor. I felt stunned, heavy, a thick fog in my head. The slightest gesture was like trying to lift a planet. There was lead in my arms, in my legs.

To my right I could see the human whirlwind on Times Square. People go there as they go to the sea: neither to fight boredom nor the anguish of a room filled with blighted dreams, but to feel less alone, or more alone.

The world turned in slow motion under the weight of the heat. The picture seemed unreal. Beneath the colorful neon carnival, people went back and forth, laughing, singing, shouting, insulting one another, all of this with an exasperating slowness.

Three sailors had come out of the hotel. When they saw Kathleen they stopped short and, in unison, gave a long admiring whistle.

“Let’s go,” Kathleen said, pulling me by the arm. She was obviously annoyed.

“What do you have against them?” I asked. “They think you’re beautiful.”

“I don’t like them to whistle like that.”

I said, in a professorial tone, “It’s their way of looking at a woman: they see her with their mouths and not with their eyes. Sailors keep their eyes for the sea: when they are on land, they leave their eyes behind as tokens of love.”

The three admirers had already been gone for quite some time.

“And you?” Kathleen asked. “How do you look at me?”

She liked to relate everything to us. We were always the center of her universe. For her, other mortals lived only to be used as comparisons.

“I? I don’t look at you,” I answered, slightly annoyed. There was a silence. I was biting my tongue. “But I love you. You know that.”

“You love me, but you don’t look at me?” she asked gloomily. “Thanks for the compliment.”

“You don’t understand,” I went right on. “One doesn’t necessarily exclude the other. You can love God, but you can’t look at Him.”

She seemed satisfied with this comparison. I would have to practice lying.

“Whom do you look at when you love God?” she asked after a moment of silence.

“Yourself. If man could contemplate the face of God, he would stop loving him. God needs love; he does not need understanding.”

“And you?”

For Kathleen, even God was not so much a subject for discussion as a way to bring the conversation back to us.

“I too,” I lied. “I too, I need your love.”

We were still in the same spot. Why hadn’t we moved? I don’t know. Perhaps we were waiting for the accident.

I’ll have to learn to lie, I kept thinking. Even for the short time I have left. To lie well. Without blushing. Until then I had been lying much too badly. I was awkward, my face would betray me and I would start blushing.

“What are we waiting for?” Kathleen was getting impatient.

“Nothing,” I said.

I was lying without knowing it: we were waiting for the accident.

“You still aren’t hungry?”

“No,” I answered.

“But you haven’t eaten anything all day,” she said reproachfully.

“No.”

Kathleen sighed.

“How long do you think you can hold out? You’re slowly killing yourself…”

There was a small restaurant nearby. We went in. All right, I told myself. I’ll also have to learn to eat. And to love. You can learn anything.

Ten or twelve people, sitting on high red stools, were eating silently at the counter. Kathleen now found herself in the crossfire of their stares. She was beautiful. Her face, especially around the lips, showed the first signs of a fear that was waiting for a chance to turn into live suffering. I would have liked to tell her once more that I loved her.

We ordered two hamburgers and two glasses of grapefruit juice.

“Eat,” Kathleen said, and she looked up at me pleadingly.

I cut off a piece and lifted it to my mouth. The smell of blood turned my stomach. I felt like throwing up. Once I had seen a man eating with great appetite a slice of meat without bread. Starving, I watched him for a long time. As if hypnotized, I followed the motion of his fingers and jaws. I was hoping that if he saw me there, in front of him, he would throw me a piece. He didn’t look up. The next day he was hanged by those who shared his barracks: he had been eating human flesh. To defend himself he had screamed, “I didn’t do any harm: he was already dead…” When I saw his body swinging in the latrine, I wondered, “What if he had seen me?”

“Eat,” Kathleen said.

I swallowed some juice.

“I’m not hungry,” I said with an effort.

A few hours later the doctors told Kathleen, “He’s lucky. He’ll suffer less because his stomach is empty. He won’t vomit so much.”

“Let’s go,” I told Kathleen as I turned to leave.

I could feel it: another minute there and I’d faint.

I paid for the hamburgers and we left. Times Square hadn’t changed. False lights, artificial shadows. The same anonymous crowd twisting and untwisting. In the bars and in the stores, the same rock-’n’-roll tunes hitting away at your temples with thousands of invisible little hammers. The neon signs still announced that to drink this or that was good for your health, for happiness, for the peace of the world, of the soul, and of I don’t know what else.

“Where would you like to go?” Kathleen inquired.

She pretended not to have noticed how pale I was. Who knows, I thought. She too perhaps will learn how to lie.

“Far,” I answered. “Very far.”

“I’ll go with you,” she declared.

The sadness and bitterness of her voice filled me with pity. Kathleen has changed, I told myself. She, who believed in defiance, in fighting, in hatred, had now chosen to submit. She, who refused to follow any call that didn’t come from herself, now recognized defeat. I knew that our suffering changes us. But I didn’t know that it could also destroy others.

“Of course,” I said. “I won’t go without you.”

I was thinking: to go far away, where the roads leading to simplicity are known not merely to a select group, but to all; where love, laughter, songs, and prayers carry with them neither anger nor shame; where I can think about myself without anguish, without contempt; where the wine, Kathleen, is pure and not mixed with the spit of corpses; where the dead live in cemeteries and not in the hearts and memories of men.

“Well?” Kathleen asked, pursuing her idea. “Where shall we go? We can’t stand here all night.”

“Let’s go to the movies,” I said.

It was still the best place. We wouldn’t be alone. We would think about something else. We would be somewhere else.

Kathleen agreed. She would have preferred to go back to my place or to hers, but she understood my objection: it would be too hot, while the movie would be air-conditioned. I came to the conclusion that it wasn’t so hard to lie.

“What shall we see?”

Kathleen looked around her, at the theaters that surround Times Square. Then she exclaimed excitedly, “The Brothers Karamazov! Let’s see The Brothers Karamazov.”

It was playing on the other side of the square. We would have to cross two avenues. An ocean of cars and noises separated us from the movie.

“I’d rather see some other picture,” I said. “I like Dostoyevski too much.”

Kathleen insisted: it was a good, great, extraordinary movie. Yul Brynner as Dmitri. It was a picture one had to see.

“I’d rather see an ordinary mystery,” I said. “Something without philosophy, without metaphysics. It’s too hot for intellectual exercises. Look, Murder in Rio is playing on this side. Let’s go to that. I’d love to know how they commit murders in Brazil.”

Kathleen was stubborn. Once again, she wanted to test our love. If Dostoyevski won, I loved her; otherwise I didn’t. I glanced at her. Still the fear around her lips, the fear that was going to become suffering. Kathleen was beautiful when she suffered; her eyes were deeper, her voice warmer, fuller; her dark beauty was simpler and more human. Her suffering had a quality of saintliness. It was her way of offering herself. I ...


Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
THE ACCIDENT occurred on an evening in July, right in the heart of New York, as Kathleen and I were crossing the street to go to see the movie The Brothers Karamazov. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.2 out of 5 stars  12 reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Great Contrast to Night Sep 13 2010
By Miami Bob - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback
This book was originally entitled "The Accident" because it involves its main character's 10-week ordeal of attempting to recover after being hit by a taxi cab in New York City. The protagonist, Eliezer, battles death and life for 10 weeks.

Elie Wiesel describes the protagonist of this novel as the survivor who endured the world's worst war to be so emotionally scarred that he thinks "wouldn't suicide be as great a temptation as love or faith?" In the preface, he mentions how children of WW II were discovered in holes and other hiding places, and whose emancipation was not a moment of magnificence. Rather, their freedom from hiding ensued into a forced starvation and eventual death - as their minds or bodies cared not to live, although offered the opportunity for such.

Pessimism about life abounds. "Maybe God is dead, but man is alive . . . " his friend lectures him. But, he also understands that God must be alive as his grandmother sagely told him "God needs love, not understanding." And, so he tries to believe.

But, such beliefs are accompanied by torments. Like an LSD-plagued person of the 1970's, he is reminded too often of what he endured in the Holocaust to feel free and alive. When recovering, the doctor wants him to fight death - usually something which can be conjured by fear. This survivor, the doctor learns, is afraid of nothing. He has seen too much. A survivor has witnessed more than he wants others to know. Like a military veteran, Wiesel for years said nothing of the hardships - then he began to write about the same. Thank God.

And, while alive the protagonist must ask why fate has delivered him to life and survival while parents and millions received much less. He surmises that "fate offered him life and maybe happiness." But, the memories continue to haunt him. He glares out almost devoid of connection to present day mind. He does not feel happy. He wants to be lucid. But, "lucidity is fate's victory, not man's."

And, despite his haunting past, others had it worse. One is named Sarah - a girl who also survived the Holocaust, but unlike he, she was deprived all concepts of decency and her childhood with one action - sending her into prostitution of the German soldiers who liked 12-year old girls. As a boy of similar age, the protagonist assumingly starved and survived the horror. As a girl, Sarah starved and survived a most despicable horror. He calls her a saint - to which she retorts with disdain.

Although this novel does not deal directly with the Holocaust, it touches upon how the Holocaust affects lives years, even decades later.

As the healing progresses, he realizes that his life is full of pain. But, "suffering is given to the living, not the dead." Hence, suffering is not a bad thing, it is just something which comes with the gift of life.

Full of great metaphors, esteemed witticisms, and almost-prophetic sayings akin to Asia's Confucius, this book delivers much in its 128 pages.
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars One Wrong Step Jan 5 2011
By Eric Wilson - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback
Wiesel's "Night" was a searing and honest account of enduring the concentration camps of World War II. It told of a young boy's will to survive, and the shame that came with that loss of innocence. "Dawn" was the next step, with a young man fighting for the survival of the Jews in Palestine, in the Holocaust's aftermath. It chronicled his ethical struggles in using violence to purchase freedom and life.

"Day" is the third step in this trilogy, and once again Wiesel writes with stark yet evocative sentences. This time, the young man is a little older and he is struggling with the acceptance of love with a wonderful woman. His struggle is accentuated by his time in a hospital bed, after taking a step onto a New York City street and being struck by a taxi. He thinks back through his sufferings, his relationships, his guilt, and his questions. This is the perfect time for us to see Wiesel's character come to grips with life, not glossing over the horrific things but moving beyond himself into a deeper care for others.

But that is not the case. Wiesel's character takes another wrong step, blaming God for every ill done by mankind, projecting man's weaknesses upon the God he had grown up learning about. What about the good he sees in others, though? What about the innocence and self-sacrifice? Should these, by the same measure, be credited to the Devil from the same Bible?

Wiesel's characters are rooted in the realities of the world, among the good and evil deeds done by people of all ages. He shows great care and compassion for his fellow human beings, and deservedly has won a Nobel Peace Prize for his writing. Sadly, though, I see no maturation in this chronology of storytelling. The characters are still wallowing in their shame, their past. Still blinded by despair. Still imprisoned by self-centeredness masquerading as survival instinct. Even when our main character makes a final selfless decision, it's only based on lies. I had hoped for something transcendent from one who has faced such suffering. Many other Holocaust survivors have come to terms with the world around them and given us examples of how to move beyond--people such as Corrie Ten Boom, in "The Hiding Place," and even Death, as a fictional character, in "The Book Thief. I only wish Wiesel could have better applied his great empathy and experience.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Deeply meditative, thought-provoking book Feb 8 2012
By AdamC - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback
I had decided to read "Day" as its own entity and firstly, it accomplishes the fact that it can stand as its own and not just a continuation of a series. "Day" tells the story of a Holocaust survivor who is struck by a car and is sent to the hospital. The book narrates from the hospital bed through reflection, memory, and in the present. What works for me in this novel is that it's immediately challenging. Wiesel doesn't shy from making readers uncomfortable, rather he utilizes the remaining emotions from his experience in the Holocaust to ask prodding questions about life, death, humanity, suffering, and so on.

The overall message I took from "Day" was rather a question of whether or not someone can regain their humanity, their sense in the world, after going through such a tragedy. I think Wiesel is hopeful. I won't spoil the ending that lends to this idea but I believe he thinks life should be lived in the present. In other words, one can't live through the dead, nor through the past, because the dead are dead and the past is the past. Lamenting can help with the grieving, but life can move forward.

This isn't a plot-driven novel. If you're a reader who searches for that, than you may not appreciate "Day". And that's fine. I don't believe Wiesel is focused on pure entertainment. "Day" is a great book and provides excellent food-for-thought on the discussion of humanity.

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Feedback


Amazon.ca Privacy Statement Amazon.ca Shipping Information Amazon.ca Returns & Exchanges