1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Politically prescient, historically significant, Mar 26 2003
I've always felt that fiction is like a window to the past, and with "The Devils," Dostoevsky gives us a clear glimpse at the underground politics brewing in Czarist Russia. At the same time, his propensity to write about criminals and people with criminal hearts is nowhere more emphasized among his major novels than in this one. There is not one character I could identify as a traditional hero, not even the semi-anonymous narrator, who relates the novel's events with the impartiality of a security camera; they are all antiheros -- a room full of Raskolnikovs.
The novel concerns a small band of Russian intellectuals, atheists, socialists, anarchists, and various other rabble who are distributing subversive leaflets in an attempt to incite the proletariat to revolt against the government. They are a motley group, destined to fail because they lack general competence, organizational skills, a clear agenda, definite plans, and even uniform ideas. The only thing they have in common is that they don't like the way things currently are in Russia and intend to change them, violently if necessary.
Among this group we meet Nicholas Stavrogin, an obnoxious, insensitive young man who is only looking out for himself and is not above having affairs with his friends' wives. The group's prime mover and instigator is Peter Verkhovensky, whose father Stepan had been Nicholas's tutor and is still living platonically with Nicholas's widowed mother, one of the wealthier citizens of the town in which the novel takes place. The group's rank-and-file who figure most prominently into the plot include the suicidal Kirilov, a former member (and potential informer) named Shatov who just wants to put it all behind him, a useless drunkard named Lebyatkin who acts as the group's stooge, and an escaped convict named Fedka who becomes the group's henchman.
That many of these people are dead by the end of the novel is not as surprising as how they get that way. The plot is built around intrigues, disloyalties, and the type of drawing-room confessions and revelations that characterize the best mysteries. It's not difficult to guess that there is a juicy secret about Lebyatkin's crippled, mentally disturbed sister Mary, or that the elegant fete arranged by Julia Lembke, the Governor's wife, will culminate in a spectacular, outrageous, and perhaps deadly climax; Dostoevsky likes sensationalism and never misses a chance to use human frailty and folly as hosts upon which the morally hollow feed like parasites.
Dostoevsky's description of these men as "devils" is a biblical allusion to the book of Luke, translating Christ's power to drive the devils out of a possessed man into a herd of swine to the cleansing of Russia of its nefarious political elements. It would appear that "The Devils" is Dostoevsky's effort to demonize the soulless, devilish radicals who have no moral underpinnings and who would replace everything he considers good about Russia (namely, the Eastern Orthodox Church) with Western ideas. There is an obvious parallel to the Bolshevik Revolution of nearly half a century later, which shows that such Socialist sentiment had been bubbling under the Russian mainstream for many years prior to its twentieth century emergence. In that sense, this is a prescient novel of historical and political interest.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
A great work of art by a great artist, Nov 19 2002
This is a work of art. All the agonoies, uncertainties, and ecstasies of being Russian are dealt with in this book by a true master. Dostoevsky was a relgious conservative, something very taboo in American society today but there can be no doubt to the genius of this books vision. The pitiful and terrifying nature of evil. Stavrogin is one of the most malevolent characters in liturature, a true Anti-Christ. The creation of a universe by a man-god the one God and the pagan gods of carnal nature all clash in this work in a way that is unsurpased.The depth, the passion of this work can drive one to maddness...Dostoyevsky's vision of Russia's Messanic mission all come togeather in the end to create an absolute...beauty.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
wake me when the revolution's over, May 19 2000
I love Dostoevsky's short stories, White Nights in particular, and many others to be sure. However, there remains a wide and yawning gap between those short, brilliant stories and this painfully slow and verbose tome of revolutionary Russia. I don't know much about Dostoevsky's politics following his near execution and imprisonment in Siberia, but clearly this novel was meant to lampoon the efforts of those who challenged czarist Russia. The first 50-75 pages are the worst the book has to offer. Thereafter it unquestionably improves albeit at a pace that would bore a turtle. For me Dostoevsky is never able to get into the heads of his characters quite like he does with his short(er) stories. Some may not share this view, but . . . If you want to read a much better story set in revolutionary times, with actual revolutionaries rather than the farcical group of clods Dostoevsky put together, read Andre Malraux's Man's Fate (The Human Condition). In half the time Malraux doe twice the work. But that's another review. In short, this is a "good" Dostoevsky novel, long , but that's what you know you're gonna' get with most 19th c. Russian writers. It's too bad that Dostoevsky is so long winded because otherwise this could easily be a great novel. Stick to Malraux for revolution but don't forget Dostoevsky's White Nights.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No