Most helpful customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good in its main points, July 16 2004
This review is from: Dogs: A Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior & Evolution (Hardcover)
The Coppingers in "Dogs" try to say a few different things. The main topics are how wolves became selected as dogs, what this implies for their behavior and training, and the ethics of pure-breeding and using working dogs as pets. In these core topics, this book is generally well argued and supported in the main, but suffers from hiccups of poor reasoning. In one example, when arguing why bigger dogs are better for the transhumance, the authors state "to cover the distance with half the steps means a longer lasting dog." Well, the bigger dog also takes heavier steps and big dogs are notorious for structural problems. However, these hiccups are minor distractions. The first core topic that dogs evolved first as scavengers of human waste dumps is interesting. While still largely a speculative hypothesis, this idea is shown fairly well in the book to be more reasonable than the idea that humans got a hold of enough wolves to domesticate them by selecting the tamest ones and tossing the others. This has implications for training in that essentially sedentary dogs foraging at a dump are not going to have wolf behaviors, particularly the widely assumed pack hierarchy. Another major topic is the discussion on why working dogs, with strongly ingrained motor patterns of behavior, are not going to be well suited for living in a house - unless you like being herded by your border collie. This too is well done and promoting the option of a more "generic" dog as a better household companion will do much good. There is also a section on how assistance dogs suffer by being bred and developed in manners inconstant with what makes for a good working dog. While this has been criticized as an argument against assistance dogs, a careful reading will show that it is a valid critique of how the system can be improved. The Coppingers' critique of the profound wrong that is breeding for show will upset the most people. But it is also the best and most important argument in the book. And no, breeding for work, for behavior, which doesn't involve closing a stud book, is not just as bad or the same thing as breeding for appearance from a closed stud book. Throughout the book, the Coppingers also try to discuss what canine evolution implies for Darwinian theories of evolution, but do so in a confused manner by misunderstanding gradualism in the modern sense as being slow, constant changes in morphology (they also use the word "saltation" in a broad and confused way) rather than the actual meaning of continuous, though possibly quite fast, change at the genetic level. They themselves argue that canids have not changed much genetically and that their diversity of form is due to developmental reasons with the needed genetic variation provided by hybridization within the species. Fortunately, these discussions are not central to enjoying the book. The Coppingers write with a bit of wit, which I enjoyed. But most importantly, this book is unique to my knowledge in trying to be rational, rather than sentimentally anthropomorphic, towards dogs. As such should be read by anyone with an interest in them and their true well-being.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
Opinions, facts, and some other things, Jun 13 2004
This review is from: Dogs: A Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior & Evolution (Hardcover)
This book is basically a mash of opinions, facts, hypocrisy, and some good reading. I generally enjoyed reading most of this book. It really helped me see how dogs did evolve from wolf-like ancestor and how they think. But Coppinger is a stereotypical scientist and goes about everything unanthropomorphically. He does have some obvious points, that AKC inbreeding does not benefit dogs, but he also makes it out that we should not own pet dogs, only working dogs. He describes herding dogs, flock guarding dogs, bird dogs and sled dogs, but not working dogs, like Dobermans. He did not go into topics like police dogs, who are trained to aprehend criminals, or personal protection dogs. Which I was hoping would be covered. This is a somewhat pleasant read, and I do recommend it, but take some of it with caution. It's not all fact, it's highly opinionated. But a lot of books are. The authors owned several hundred dogs all at once. Which is horrible. That type of upkeep does not allow dogs to have any emotional attachments to people, and they are more like moving objects, not living things.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
I don't care!, Sep 27 2003
This review is from: Dogs: A Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior & Evolution (Hardcover)
I don't care what the rest of you guys say - except for the others who gave this book 5 stars - it's a great, wonderful read. If you love dogs and especially if you have wondered a lot about how wolves turned into dogs, read it, you'll like it. True, it's probably an exaggeration on the part of the authors to say that they have had close relationships with all those dogs - what do they claim, 3,000 or so? And then they just sold off all their sled dogs and went on to something else. But the research they've done is never-endingly-fascinating. I feel I understand my dogs better than before, and what more could you ask? Review by Janet Knori, author of Awakening in God
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|