Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

CDN$ 64.30 + CDN$ 3.49 shipping
In Stock. Sold by thebookcommunity_ca

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
M and N Media Canada Add to Cart
CDN$ 102.38
Have one to sell? Sell yours here

Dracula a.D. 1972

Christopher Lee , Peter Cushing , Alan Gibson    PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)   DVD
3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (17 customer reviews)
Price: CDN$ 64.30
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by thebookcommunity_ca.

Product Details


Product Description

Brand New Factory Sealed

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars Drac is hip in the 1970's! Feb 26 2012
Format:VHS Tape
I know alot of people don't like this Hammer Dracula film but I think it's terrific. Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing are fantastic as usual. The very fact that the film tries so hard to be hip and cool gives it a certain charm. It is a time capsule of the 70's. I admit that Dracula does not tranfer well to modern London but they tried their hardest to make it work. Dig the crazy language the young folk speak. It could be a giggle!
Was this review helpful to you?
By A Customer
Format:VHS Tape
Not a great film at all. It is interesting to have the count in the 20th century, but he does not belong in it. He needs to stay back in the 1800's, as Stoker meant him to be.

This film is also confusing in many ways. If it is indeed a sequel to "Horror Of Dracula", then how did the count come to be? In "Scars Of Dracula", he caught fire and fell to his death, leaving nothing of himself (presumably). And, being Professor Van Helsing was not in any of the period sequels, how did they fit this story in about he and Dracula fighting one another to the death in 1872? Did this happen in one of the films when we weren't looking? Very unlikely.

At least Peter Cushing returns (finally) as a descendent of Professor Van Helsing. Too bad he could not have been in the four previous films.

As I said, this one is not worth watching, unless you're bored. And if you're bored, this film will add to it.

Was this review helpful to you?
4.0 out of 5 stars good at some points Dec 26 2003
Format:VHS Tape
This movie started out slow but it got better.The scene were VAN HELSING and DRACULA [PETER CUSHING and CHRISTOPHER LEE]where they were on that run away wagon was exceptional.The scene were DRACULA[CHRISTOPHER LEE] bit that woman[bit I'd say slashed]was okay and the scene were dracula[christopher lee]fell on the stakes and died.As you read this review you'll find out that this movie moves from okay to borring to okay.
Was this review helpful to you?
Want to see more reviews on this item?
Most recent customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars Dracula moves to "modern day" England
Hammer brought Cushing (11 year absence since Brides) and Lee in yet another Dracula film, and broke the taboo keeping them in the past, and moved them into present day (well, it... Read more
Published on Nov 5 2003 by Deborah MacGillivray
5.0 out of 5 stars Dracula A.D 1972
A Dracula Movie Will done and Well Made Christopher Lee As Dracula At his Best For every Horror Fan get this movie
Published on Aug 23 2002 by David L. Champer
3.0 out of 5 stars London Stake House.
Changes in directors, budgets, and vision at Hammer Studios had its effect. This is an odd entry in the Dracula series. Read more
Published on Jun 4 2002 by Robert S. Clay Jr.
3.0 out of 5 stars Dracula versus debauched 70s youth culture
"Dracula A.D. 1972," starring Christopher Lee as the titular vampire, is one bizarre film. It starts with a prologue set in the 1800s: Lee's Dracula is shown in battle with his... Read more
Published on Mar 31 2002 by Michael J. Mazza
4.0 out of 5 stars IT'S OKAY!
This film brings back Christopher Lee as Count Dracula but this time he isn't at his castle in the late 18oo's.This time he's in London 1972! Read more
Published on Feb 18 2002 by Vincent Donato
3.0 out of 5 stars Weakest Hammer Dracula, with only Cushing shining
Toward the end of Hammer Films' reign as THE horror movie studio, they decided to transport the Dracula character into the modern era. Read more
Published on Feb 8 2002 by Steve Miller
4.0 out of 5 stars Dracula at Church!!
Okay, Hammer was really scraping the bottom when it decided to do this one (don't ask me why they made the Satanic Rites. Read more
Published on Dec 26 2001 by "waymakerjim"
4.0 out of 5 stars Forget the critics. This Dracula movie does not (...)
This much-maligned Hammer Horror earns poor reviews merely for setting Dracula in modern (1972) London. While Hammer excelled at lush, atmospheric gothic horror, this one works. Read more
Published on Dec 3 2001 by Scott Vandenberg
3.0 out of 5 stars Not an Anemic Hammer Sequel
This Hammer entry while not the best of the series is an interesting study in Hammer horror. The story although interesting isnt enough to carry the film but Christopher Lee and... Read more
Published on July 11 2001 by "tattooedacrobat"
4.0 out of 5 stars Campy, moreso than other entries in the series
Dracula A.D. 1972 is particularly campy due to the 1970s mod/hippie wardrobe and setting. Dracula resurfaces in "modern" London after being revived in a satanic devil... Read more
Published on May 23 2001
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Feedback


thebookcommunity_ca Privacy Statement thebookcommunity_ca Shipping Information thebookcommunity_ca Returns & Exchanges