iEaseful Death/i sets out in straightforward terms the main arguments both for and against the legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia. The legal choices confronting those caring for the terminally ill, and indeed those patients themselves who may be facing intolerable suffering towards the end of their lives, have been the cause of fierce public debate in recent years. The book takes as its starting point attempts in Britain and other countries to bring compassion into the rules governing the end of a patient's life. Drawing on experience in the Netherlands, Belgium, and the US state of Oregon, where either assisted dying or euthanasia have been legalized, the authors explore the philosophical and ethical views on both sides of the debate, and examine how different legislative proposals would affect different members of society, from the very young to the very old. They describe the practical, medical processes of palliative care, self-denial of food and water, and assisted dying and euthanasia, and ultimately conclude that the public is ready to embrace a more compassionate approach to assisted dying. This sensitive and authoritative short volume is informed throughout by a strong sense that, whatever the results of the legislative argument, compassion for one another must be both the guide and the restraint upon the way we treat people who are dying or who want to die.
|
There is a newer edition of this item:
|
Book Description
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Product Description
Review
"Mary Warnock and Elisabeth Macdonald set out with exemplary clarity reasons for prohibiting or permitting physicians to "help" patients to die. Their arguments are cogent, illuminating, and in many ways convincing." -- Onora O'Neill, Lancet
"Warnock manages to communicate a wealth of accumulated insight into the ethics of assisted reproduction."--Susanne Gibson, Analytic Teaching
"... powerful little book."--Dea Birkett, The Independent
About the Author
Baroness Mary Warnock is a philosopher renowned for her writing on moral issues. Previously a Fellow and Tutor in Philosophy at St Hugh's College, Oxford, and Mistress of Girton College, Cambridge, she is now an Independent Life Peer in the House of Lords, and a writer and broadcaster. She was Chairman of the UK Committee of Inquiry into the Education of Children with Special Needs (report 1978); Chairman of the UK Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertility and Embryology (report 1984) and a Member of the House of Lords Select Committee on Euthanasia (1993). She is a Fellow of the British Academy, and Honorary Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. Her numerous books include iAn Intelligent Person's Guide to Ethics/i (2004), and iMaking Babies: Is There a Right To Have Children? /i (2001). Elisabeth Macdonald has spent her career working in cancer medicine in the UK as well as periods as a Consultant Oncologist in France and in research at Stanford University, California. In 1988 she was appointed a consultant Cancer Specialist at Guy's and St Thomas' Teaching Hospitals in London. Her wide clinical experience includes palliative care in the hospital setting. She has an M.A. in Medical Law and Ethics from Kings College London and has taught medical ethics as an external tutor at Ethox, The Institute for Health Science in Oxford. She has retired from clinical practice and currently teaches Communication Skills to medical undergraduates at Guys Hospital. She also continues a medico-legal practice as an "Expert Witness. Her book on communication in medicine, iDifficult Conversations in Medicine/i aimed at both medical students and patients, was published in 2004.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
The issue before us is whether or not, for those who truly want it, assisted death should be a lawful option. Read the first page Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
The issue before us is whether or not, for those who truly want it, assisted death should be a lawful option. Read the first page Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Reviews
There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
4.0 out of 5 stars
1 review
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
Why exclude depression as a motivation?
July 5 2009
By Sylvia Caras
- Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
This is a careful discussion of ideas that are often hard to write about. Ideas that it is time to consider. The author's exploration is comprehensive, well annotated, and the language clear.
I have two comments to add.
While I agree that the strident objections from part of the disability community about helping death along are from the edges, I want also to acknowledge how often people with disabilities are not given full preventive medical care, how often aches and lumps are dismissed as secondary to the presenting disability, and how that leads to a concern that any social acceptance of hastening death will also mean less good interventions for people with disabilities who do not think of themselves as dying, less attempts to keep babies alive who have been born with disabilities, as were many of the objecting advocates.
Depression is also a disability, and excluding it out of hand as a motivation for wanting to die, which the authors do without exploration (p 121), assuming that it can be `fixed', is to discount the pain of living with depression, to ignore the other effects of medications and the sometimes lack of efficacy, to dismiss the autonomy of some who know there hard life has been lived enough. The hopelessness and lack of dignity of ongoing depression is no less severe than other conditions, and assuming this can be fixed, is for some, as fantastic as assuming one can recover from pvs.
I have two comments to add.
While I agree that the strident objections from part of the disability community about helping death along are from the edges, I want also to acknowledge how often people with disabilities are not given full preventive medical care, how often aches and lumps are dismissed as secondary to the presenting disability, and how that leads to a concern that any social acceptance of hastening death will also mean less good interventions for people with disabilities who do not think of themselves as dying, less attempts to keep babies alive who have been born with disabilities, as were many of the objecting advocates.
Depression is also a disability, and excluding it out of hand as a motivation for wanting to die, which the authors do without exploration (p 121), assuming that it can be `fixed', is to discount the pain of living with depression, to ignore the other effects of medications and the sometimes lack of efficacy, to dismiss the autonomy of some who know there hard life has been lived enough. The hopelessness and lack of dignity of ongoing depression is no less severe than other conditions, and assuming this can be fixed, is for some, as fantastic as assuming one can recover from pvs.
›
Go to Amazon.com to see the review
4.0 out of 5 stars
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Medical Books > Medicine > Euthanasia
- Books > Medical Books > Medicine > Medical Ethics
- Books > New & Used Textbooks > Humanities > Philosophy > Ethics
- Books > New & Used Textbooks > Medicine > Administration & Policy > Ethics
- Books > New & Used Textbooks > Social Sciences
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Ethics & Morality
- Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Sociology > Death
- Books > Science & Math > Medicine > Physician & Patient > Medical Ethics
Feedback
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
