CDN$ 13.86
  • List Price: CDN$ 18.99
  • You Save: CDN$ 5.13 (27%)
FREE Shipping on orders over CDN$ 25.
Usually ships within 1 to 2 months.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Eisenhower And Berlin 1945 Paperback – May 25 2000


See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
CDN$ 7.19
Paperback
"Please retry"
CDN$ 13.86
CDN$ 2.00 CDN$ 0.27

2014 Books Gift Guide for Children & Teens
Browse our featured books to find gift ideas for the boys or girls on your holiday shopping list this year!


Product Details

  • Paperback: 120 pages
  • Publisher: WW Norton (May 25 2000)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0393320103
  • ISBN-13: 978-0393320107
  • Product Dimensions: 1.4 x 0.1 x 2.1 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 141 g
  • Average Customer Review: 2.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #2,743,712 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

Review

An able and convincing brief, defending Eisenhower's decisions. -- American Historical

The most authoritative, succinct statement of the argument that Eisenhower was correct in his decision. -- Choice

From the Publisher

Maps

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
OF ALL THE FACTORS that influenced General Dwight D. Eisenhower's decision to stop at the Elbe River, few were more important than one brought about on March 7 by accident. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

2.3 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
0
3 star
2
2 star
0
1 star
1
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

Format: Paperback
This is a short book about why Ike did not use the opportunity to capture Berlin in 1945. This is an earlier book before Ambrose became widely known, and to be honest more scholorly and less reader friendly. It is a short read.
Ike did not sanction the capture of Berlin for a number of reasons. First, Berlin was in the Soviet sphere in Germany, and second because his troops were not in as good a position as the Russians of taking the Nazi capital. The cost in human lives would also be great, especially if the city would have to be handed back to the Russians. For these reasons, Ike decided that Berlin was not worth the risk, and sent his forces toward Leipzig. Ike made a sound military decision.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Format: Paperback
I am a hugh fan of Stephen Ambrose. However, this very small book was a great disappointment. First of all its only about 100 pages plus appendices. It is more like reading a college history report. Stephen Ambrose is my favorite history author but, he seems to have a blind spot when it comes to Eisenhower. In Ambroses eyes he can do no wrong. If you want a much more detailed viewpoint of the battle for Berlin read The Last Battle by Cornelius Ryan.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on July 20 2000
Format: Paperback
After reading Citizen Soldiers, D-Day, and Band of Brothers, I came to one conclusion. Ambrose is great at interviewing veterans and taking those interviews and making pretty good books out of them. However, he should not attempt to analyze the strategy of several generals in World War 2. Ambrose is ignorant to the fact that even though our allies in the east were communists, they still bled alot more than the Western Allies did and suffered far more from the wrath of the Third Reich. Ambrose is a fool for criticizing Cornelius Ryan's The Last Battle. Ryan was able to interview hundreds from BOTH sides of the war. While Ambrose just interviews Americans, Ryan interviewed Americans, British, Russians, and Germans. Also don't forget that Ryan was able to interview all the key players of the Battle of Berlin; Ike, Bradley, Chuikov, Rokossovskii, Heinrici, and too many more for me to list here. If you want a great account of the Battle of Berlin and the decision of the West not to attack the capital, read Ryan's The Last Battle. Take it from a guy who was with our troops and interviewed ALL of the major players in the battle.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 8 reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
The Decision Speaks Well of Eisenhower Oct. 12 2012
By Epistem Quest - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
I should state right off the bat that I am not a war history buff. I purchased this book, and a couple others, in order to expand my knowledge of World War II. I decided to read this one first.

Knowing something of Stephen Ambrose's view of Eisenhower, I expected a positive presentation of Eisenhower's decision to let the Russians take Berlin. I was not surprised in this regard. The only question for me was, did Eisenhower's decision make military sense? I think he makes his case that Eisenhower made the right decision from many angles.

General Eisenhower asked General Omar Bradley for an estimate of how many soldiers would lose their lives in taking Berlin. Bradley figured 100,000. It was already decided by political means that Berlin would be divided four ways. Similarly,Berlin was within the Russian sector. Eisenhower felt that Berlin was not worth losing 100,000 soldiers over, and that the Russians were closer and better prepared to do that task. In addition, Eisenhower wanted to crush Germany as quickly as possible, and he felt Berlin could take away from that objective. The book is a defense of the military logic of his decision.

I found much to admire about Dwight D. Eisenhower in this book. He was his own man, but sought consensus as best he could without compromising his war plan. He had a deep understanding of the role of military decisions relative to the political process. He valued his troops. Ambrose says of Eisenhower, "Seldom in four years, during which time he had to deal with countless megalomaniacs, innumerable irritating problems, and dozens of major crises, did he lose his temper. He did not carry over into the next day the problems of the moment; he approached every decision on its own merits. He could do so because he liked people and therefore enjoyed life." I can't help but respect his decision not to forfeit 100,000 soldiers for something he later referred to as a "worthless objective." He was the right man, in the right place, at the right time. I like Ike!
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful
MORE LIKE A THESIS PAPER THAN A BOOK May 12 2000
By Jeffrey M. Hyder - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
I am a hugh fan of Stephen Ambrose. However, this very small book was a great disappointment. First of all its only about 100 pages plus appendices. It is more like reading a college history report. Stephen Ambrose is my favorite history author but, he seems to have a blind spot when it comes to Eisenhower. In Ambroses eyes he can do no wrong. If you want a much more detailed viewpoint of the battle for Berlin read The Last Battle by Cornelius Ryan.
9 of 13 people found the following review helpful
Why Ike decided not to capture Berlin in 1945. May 29 2000
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
This is a short book about why Ike did not use the opportunity to capture Berlin in 1945. This is an earlier book before Ambrose became widely known, and to be honest more scholorly and less reader friendly. It is a short read.
Ike did not sanction the capture of Berlin for a number of reasons. First, Berlin was in the Soviet sphere in Germany, and second because his troops were not in as good a position as the Russians of taking the Nazi capital. The cost in human lives would also be great, especially if the city would have to be handed back to the Russians. For these reasons, Ike decided that Berlin was not worth the risk, and sent his forces toward Leipzig. Ike made a sound military decision.
13 of 20 people found the following review helpful
Ambrose is overrated. READ THE LAST BATTLE July 20 2000
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
After reading Citizen Soldiers, D-Day, and Band of Brothers, I came to one conclusion. Ambrose is great at interviewing veterans and taking those interviews and making pretty good books out of them. However, he should not attempt to analyze the strategy of several generals in World War 2. Ambrose is ignorant to the fact that even though our allies in the east were communists, they still bled alot more than the Western Allies did and suffered far more from the wrath of the Third Reich. Ambrose is a fool for criticizing Cornelius Ryan's The Last Battle. Ryan was able to interview hundreds from BOTH sides of the war. While Ambrose just interviews Americans, Ryan interviewed Americans, British, Russians, and Germans. Also don't forget that Ryan was able to interview all the key players of the Battle of Berlin; Ike, Bradley, Chuikov, Rokossovskii, Heinrici, and too many more for me to list here. If you want a great account of the Battle of Berlin and the decision of the West not to attack the capital, read Ryan's The Last Battle. Take it from a guy who was with our troops and interviewed ALL of the major players in the battle.
Favorite Author Aug. 30 2013
By brad jones - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I really enjoyed reading this book. It really sheds a light on a controversial piece of WW2 history and explains the real reason to halt the allied advance through Germany.


Feedback