Most helpful customer reviews
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Does history matter? YES, April 1 2004
About the nicest thing I can say about this book's predecessor (The Gates of Rome) is that it left me interested enough to read the sequel. Unfortunately, Iggulden once again twists history to suit his own plots and doesn't have any compelling characters to show for it. The biggest annoyance I have with this series is the blatant disregard for historical fact, especially considering that the publisher has promoted the series as "the perfect blend of history and fiction". The somewhat distorted history of the last book is further mangled in the followup. I wouldn't be surprised if Caesar kills Brutus if the discrepancies continue to increase. I do not accept the argument that the historical record can be altered to produce a better plot. It comes off as half-hearted. Iggulden should take some advice from Guy Gavriel Kay and change the names of characters and locations and write a fantasy novel instead. At least he can mask any deliberate inaccuracies. If you want exciting books that keep true to the history, read Steven Saylor. Another weakness demonstrated by Iggulden is his character development. In good historical fiction, characters are as complex as history records them. Sulla is not all evil, Marius is not all good, and mobs never speak with one voice. The first book suffered from a sloppy writing style that featured a lot of grinning. The author just loves that expression. Thankfully the narrative runs a little smoother in this book (and there is considerably less grinning). I might tread on to the next novel, mostly because the history is changing so much that it actually adds an element of surprise. This is better suited for fantasy novels, but I can afford to continue, albeit at a paperback price.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
Stick with Colleen McCullough, April 15 2004
By A Customer
If historical fiction is your bag, be warned that Iggulden's works are more fiction than history and pale in comparison to Colleen McCullough's magnificent series on Caesar, Sulla, Marius, Cicero. etc. If you have a basic understanding of Roman history in the century before Christ, you'll have trouble enjoying this book (and its predecessor). Iggulden's Caesar grows up on a rural estate, leading a Tom Sawyer-like childhood with his best friend, Brutus. Fact is that Caesar grew up in the Subura section of Rome, a teeming, dangerous inner city area. Nor was he a childhood friend of his eventual betrayer Brutus. The good news on Death of Kings is that it is faster paced and a more enjoyable read than volume 1 of the Emperor series. Caesar versus the pirates, versus King Mithradates, versus Spartacus--these chapters hold your interest (although Caesar probably was not involved in the Spartacus campaign). McCullough's Masters of Rome series is , perhaps, the best historical fiction ever written and certainly (along with I,Claudius) the best on ancient Rome. Iggulden doesn't belong in the same category. A decent read, nothing more.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
More fantasy than history, April 25 2004
If you are interested in a good historical novel that accurately tells the life of Julius Caesar then don't buy this book. Colleen McCullough's series of books on late republican Rome are far better. I won't begin to describe all the historical inaccuracies but Caesar's role in the Mithridatic war and his relationship with Cato are just a few. Another interesting invention is the introduction of Octavian as a small boy about 74BC. He wasn't even born until 63BC! Iggulden also seems to have little understanding of the Roman army of the time. While the army structure described is reasonably accurate for the 2nd century BC, the hastati, triarii, etc had been abolished under Marius and the army of the time was the standard legion-cohort-century structure. Apart from all this, none of the characters read as particularly interesting except perhaps for Spartacus. The Spartacus revolt is perhaps the most interesting part of the book and is even reasonably historically accurate. The sad thing is that many people will read this book thinking that it reflects true Roman history when the real history is actually far more interesting.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|