Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Empire
 
 

Empire [Paperback]

Michael Hardt , Antonio Negri
3.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (48 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback --  
Paperback, Mar 10 2000 --  

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details


Product Description

From Amazon

Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt's Empire has already caused quite a storm. After "anti-capitalist" demonstrations and books such as Naomi Klein's No Logo and George Monbiot's Captive State, a vacuum seemed to exist for an extensive, coherent philosophical take on where our world is going. Empire seeks to fill that gap by asking where globalisation comes from, what it means and whether or not it is a good or bad thing.

Negri, a Marxist imprisoned for his beliefs and his involvement with the Italian hard-left, and Michael Hardt, an English literature professor who had previously acted as Negri's translator (and the translator of an important, though philosophically more arcane, precursor to Empire, Giorgio Agamben's The Coming Community) have produced a key post-Marxist text (which builds on many of the arguments in Nick Dyer-Witheford's excellent Cyber-Marx) that views its world through lenses bequeathed to it by the best of the French post-structuralists. Negri and Hardt's accomplishment has been to apply the sometimes difficult work of theorists such as Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari (especially A Thousand Plateaus) and Jacques Derrida to describe a world that has undergone a paradigm switch to a new Empire (in a way not dissimilarly than Thomas Keenan does particularly in his chapter on Marx's rhetoric in the much undervalued Fables of Responsibility). According to Negri and Hardt, this new Empire is the result of the transformation of modern capitalism into a set of power relationships we endlessly replicate that transcend the nation state (so anti-imperialism is out as a progressive politics). Vitally, the authors argue that the multitude, through their many struggles, pushed the world to this point and it is the multitude who can push through to a much better world on the other side of globalisation.

This is an optimistic, wide-ranging, defiant challenge of a book and Negri and Hardt should be commended on their erudition as much as their vision. While questions undoubtedly remain after reading the text, these should not stop the interested reader in coming to, and learning from, this profound piece of work. --Mark Thwaite --This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.

Review

Michael Hardt and Tony Negri have given us an original, suggestive and provocative assessment of the international economic and political moment we have entered. Abandoning many of the propositions of conventional marxism such as imperialism, the centrality of the national contexts of social struggle and a cardboard notion of the working class, the authors nonetheless show the salience of the marxist framework as a tool of explanation. This book is bound to stimulate a new debate about globalization and the possibilities for social transformation in the 21st century.
--Stanley Aronowitz, author of False Promises: The Shaping of American Working Class Consciousness (20010707)

Empire...is a bold move away from established doctrine. Hardt and Negri's insistence that there really is a new world is promulgated with energy and conviction. Especially striking is their renunciation of the tendency of many writers on globalization to focus exclusively on the top, leaving the impression that what happens down below, to ordinary people, follows automatically from what the great powers do.
--Stanley Aronowitz (The Nation 20010715)

Empire is a stunningly original attempt to come to grips with the cultural, political, and economic transformations of the contemporary world. While refusing to ignore history, Hardt and Negri question the adequacy of existing theoretical categories, and offer new concepts for approaching the practices and regimes of power of the emergent world order. Whether one agrees with it or not, it is an all too rare effort to engage with the most basic and pressing questions facing political intellectuals today.
--Lawrence Grossberg, author of We Gotta Get Out of This Place: Popular Conservatism and Postmodern Culture (20020601)

An extraordinary book, with enormous intellectual depth and a keen sense of the history-making transformation that is beginning to take shape--a new system of rule Hardt and Negri name Empire imperialism.
--Saskia Sassen, author of Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization

By way of Spinoza, Wittgenstein, Marx, the Vietnam War, and even Bill Gates, Empire offers an irresistible, iconoclastic analysis of the 'globalized' world. Revolutionary, even visionary, Empire identifies the imminent new power of the multitude to free themselves from capitalist bondage.
--Leslie Marmon Silko, author of Almanac of the Dead

After reading Empire, one cannot escape the impression that if this book were not written, it would have to be invented. What Hardt and Negri offer is nothing less than a rewriting of The Communist Manifesto for our time: Empire conclusively demonstrates how global capitalism generates antagonisms that will finally explode its form. This book rings the death-bell not only for the complacent liberal advocates of the 'end of history,' but also for pseudo-radical Cultural Studies which avoid the full confrontation with today's capitalism.
--lavoj Zizek, The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Center of Political Ontology

Empire is one of the most brilliant, erudite, and yet incisively political interpretations available to date of the phenomenon called 'globalization.' Engaging critically with postcolonial and postmodern theories, and mindful throughout of the plural histories of modernity and capitalism, Hardt and Negri rework Marxism to develop a vision of politics that is both original and timely. This very impressive book will be debated and discussed for a long time.
--Dipesh Chakrabarty, author of Provincializing Europe

The new book by Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt, Empire, is an amazing tour de force. Written with communicative enthusiasm, extensive historical knowledge, systematic organization, it basically combines a kojevian notion of global market as post-history (in this sense akin to Fukuyama's eschatology) with a foucauldian and deleuzian notion of bio-politics (in this sense crossing the road of a Sloterdijk who also poses the question of a coming techniques of the production of the human species). But it clearly outbids its rivals in philosophical skill. And, above all, it reverses their grim prospects of political stagnation or the return to zoology. By identifying the new advances of technology and the division of labor that underlies the globalization of the market and the corresponding de-centered structure of sovereignty with a deep structure of power located within the multitude's intellectual and affective corporeity, it seeks to identify the indestructible sources of resistance and constitution that frame our future. It claims to lay the foundations for a teleology of class struggles and militancy even more substantially "communist" than the classical Marxist one. This will no doubt trigger a lasting and passionate discussion among philosophers, political scientists and socialists. Whatever their conclusions, the benefits will be enormous for intelligence.
--Etienne Balibar, author of Spinoza and Politics

So what does a disquisition on globalization have to offer scholars in crisis? First, there is the book's broad sweep and range of learning. Spanning nearly 500 pages of densely argued history, philosophy and political theory, it features sections on Imperial Rome, Haitian slave revolts, the American Constitution and the Persian Gulf War, and references to dozens of thinkers like Machiavelli, Spinoza, Hegel, Hobbes, Kant, Marx and Foucault. In short, the book has the formal trappings of a master theory in the old European tradition...[This] book is full of...bravura passages. Whether presenting new concepts--like Empire and multitude--or urging revolution, it brims with confidence in its ideas. Does it have the staying power and broad appeal necessary to become the next master theory? It is too soon to say. But for the moment, Empire is filling a void in the humanities.
--Emily Eakin (New York Times )

One of the rare benefits to the credit [of the contemporary Empire] is to have undermined the ramparts of the nation, ethnicity, race, and peoples by multiplying the instances of contact and hybridization. Perhaps, at least this is the hope forwarded by these two Marx and Engels of the internet age, it has thus made possible the coming of new forms of transnational solidarity that will defeat Empire.
--Aude Lancelin (Le Nouvel Observateur )

A sweeping neo-Marxist vision of the coming world order. The authors argue that globalization is not eroding sovereignty but transforming it into a system of diffuse national and supranational institutions--in other words, a new 'empire'...[that] encompasses all of modern life. (Foreign Affairs )

The collaboration between American literary theorist and Italian political philosopher has produced a strange and graceful work, of rare imaginative drive and richness of intellectual reference. However counter-intuitive its conclusions, Empire is in its own terms a work of visionary intensity.
--Gopul Balakrishnan (New Left Review )

Globalization's positive side is, intriguingly, a message of a hot new book. Since it was published last year, Empire ...has been translated into four new languages, with six more on the way...It is selling briskly on Amazon.com and is impossible to find in Manhattan bookstores. For 413 pages of dense political philosophy--whose compass ranges from body piercing to Machiavelli--that's impressive.
--Michael Elliott (Time )

How often can it happen that a book is swept off the shelves until you can't find a copy in New York for love nor money?...Empire is a sweeping history of humanist philosophy, Marxism and modernity that propels itself to a grand political conclusion: that we are a creative and enlightened species, and that our history is that of humanity's progress towards the seizure of power from those who exploit it.
--Ed Vulliamy (The Observer )

Hardt is not just bent on saving the world. He has also been credited with dragging the humanities in American universities out of the doldrums...[Empire] presents a philosophical vision that some have greeted as the 'next big thing' in the field of the humanities, with its authors the natural successors of names such as Claude Levi-Strauss, Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault. (Sunday Times )

Hailed as the new Communist Manifesto on its dust jacket, this hefty tome may be worthy of such distinction...Hardt and Negri analyze the multiple processes of globalization...and argue that the new sovereign, the new order of the globalized world, is a decentered and deterritorializing apparatus of rule...Though Empire ties together diverse strands of often opaque structuralist and poststructuralist theory...the writing is surprisingly clear, accessible, and engaging...Hardt and Negri write to communicate beyond the claustrophobic redoubts of the academy...In short, Empire is a comprehensive and exciting analysis of the now reified concept of globalization, offering a lucid understanding of the political-economic quagmire of our present and a glimpse into the possible worlds beyond it.
--Tom Roach (Cultural Critique )

In their recent book Empire--a highly explosive analysis of globalisation-[the authors] take the effort to develop a full narrative of this new world order, of the global postmodern sovereignty and its counter-currents. It is therefore not so much a book on hybridity only, but rather an attempt to reformulate and redefine the political under conditions of globalisation. The result is a resolute tour de force delineating the genealogy of the postmodern regime as well as its consolidation as a new "society of control" under conditions of world-wide "real subsumption" which creates one smooth, global capitalist terrain.
--Dirk Wiemann (Journal for the Study of British Cultures )

Stretching back nearly twenty years, Antonio Negri's work has been until recently one of the best-kept secrets of Marxist theory in the United States...[Empire] is the culmination of Negri's lifework and a major contribution to Marx's uncompleted work on capitalism's international phase. Beyond its inherent scholarly merit, however, Empire provides a critical tool for understanding what the events following September 11th mean as history and politics.
--Curtis White (Bookforum )

Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's Empire, by contrast, owes its density not to affected language – indeed, its manifesto – like communicative urgency is one of its greatest strengths – but to the exhilarating novelty of what it has to say…This is as simple, as apparently innocent, and as radically counter-intuitive when thought to its limit as the Sartrean dictum that existence precedes essence must have been in its time. It's not that this relation had never been thought before; the connection between the demands of labor unions and the development of the automated factory is well-known. But in Hardt and Negri's hands this relation becomes a powerful new way to theorize globalization and the development of capital itself… Hardt and Negri perform the urgent task of reclaiming Utopia for the multitude.
--Nicholas Brown (Symploke )

Hardt, an assistant professor of literature and a political scientist (and currently a prison inmate), has produced one of the most comprehensive theoretical efforts to understand globalization. Choice (Choice )

The appearance of Empire represents a spectacular break. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri defiantly overturn the verdict that the last two decades have been a time of punitive defeats for the Left…Hardt and Negri open their case by arguing that, although nation- state-based systems of power are rapidly unraveling in the force-fields of world capitalism, globalization cannot be understood as a simple process of de- regulating markets. Far from withering away, regulations today proliferate and interlock to form an acephelous supranational order which the authors choose to call "Empire"…bravely upholds the possibility of a utopian manifesto for these times, in which the desire for another world buried or scattered in social experience could find an authentic language and point of concentration.
--Gopal Balakrishnan (New Left Review )

This sprawling book is filled with original ideas and analyses, including some well-aimed critiques of postmodernism, dependency theory, world systems theory, anti-imperialism, and localism-and there is much more besides to stimulate the reader…this is an exciting and provocative book whose depth and richness can only be hinted at in so brief a review.
--Frank Ninkovich (Political Science Quarterly )

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
The problematic of Empire is determined in the first place by one simple fact: that there is world order. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 
(2)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


 

Customer Reviews

48 Reviews
5 star:
 (11)
4 star:
 (15)
3 star:
 (5)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (15)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.1 out of 5 stars (48 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most helpful customer reviews

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Very useful and at times prophetic, Jun 13 2003
By 
Large Pro (Los Angeles, CA United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Empire (Paperback)
This book is definitely neither for the critical theory neophyte, nor for those of an already hardened ideological position on globalization and identity politics. However, the close reader will be rewarded with innumerable moments of productive provocation and reflection. There are very interesting insights on the limits of all the "posts," namely postmodernism, poststructuralism, and postcolonialism, none of which seem to get at the historical passage from modernity to Empire in a fashion entirely suitable to the authors' p.o.v. I must say that, in many respects, I agree with their critiques. There's also a very prophetic account of Empire's "police intervention" function that certainly makdes one think of "Operation Iraqui Freedom" in a new light, as well as a section on the rise of fundamentalism as a symptom of Empire's arrival that casts the horrors of 9-11 in a broader perspective. All in all, despite the often tortuous prose and high-fallutin' way with slogans and metaphors, a very useful book for anyone who has both a strong a critical theory background and an open-minded attitude to fresh debates.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars review the book not the prose, Jun 10 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: Empire (Paperback)
sadly my review has to speak more of other reviews than "empire" itself. i really wish people would find another forum to air their grievances with the difficulties of academic discourse. it seems to go like this: to express complicated thoughts, you need a complicated VOCABULARY!!! think about the words you knew when you were 7...were they adequate to express the thoughts and feelings you have now? in the same vein, it is not possible to construct complex theoretical arguments without employing complex terms. if you dont understand the jargon (yes it is jargon) used in "empire", then read some cultural theory and learn how to throw these words around. when you go to an auto mechanic, do you have any clue what they are talking about (whatshaft? beltwhat?) why is this any different from the professional language of the academic or cultural theorist? do you accuse mechanics or engineers of locking themselves in an ivory tower? think about it. the bottom line is that if you arent the least bit familiar with hegel, kant, foucalt, deleuze, marx, etc...then this book maybe isnt for you just yet. it is an elaboration, an extension. you have to crawl before you can walk. obviously it is problematic that a book aimed towards ultimately inciting global revolution is only accessible to an academic minority. once hardt and negri have delivered their concepts in a well-formulated, academic fashion, then they can boil it down and make a pamphlet out of it that joe prolitarian can comprehend. keep your frustration and incomprehension private, or do something about it on your own rather than crowding valid, thoughtful book reviews with your griping. i have found "empire" very intriguing and enlightening, although it obviously has its utopian pitfalls. griping about it being anti-american is akin to complaining that its anti-imperialist. read and try to understand the book before you start crying in public.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Yes, Intellectuals are Esoteric, April 19 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: Empire (Paperback)
I agree that Hardt and Negri did not write this book for Uncle Joe and Aunt Sally (symbolic violence). I also feel that this is unfortunate because they make some interesting arguments. In my opinion, these authors thought that their "message" was very important and needed to be read by "the most important people". Unfortunately they believe that "the most important people" are future professors and current professors. I think that most of us would tend to think "the most important people" are the "multitude" or "the people" (to use Hardt and Negri's language). Why do these authors believe that academics should read their book? Ironically, they might have faith in an educational trickle-down theory!

OK so let us assume you DO have a strong background in Critical, Cutlural, Political, Philosophical, and Literary Theory. I assume that the arguments made by Hardt and Nergi are currently being debated within your fields as they are in my field. I highly suggest picking up this book. I will warn you that some chapters may be harder to read than others because you lack the specific background (for example Hegal and Kant). If you are somewhat "well read" in the academic areas mentioned above (for example: you know something about postmodern and post colonial theory), I suggest you pick up this book. After you have read the book - talk to your friends about it and use it in your classes (trickle down theory)- unless you believe in vanguard-elite-domination of knowledge production and consumption!

PS In my opinion, the first chapter are the WORST (1.1 thru 1.3)so I'd do a quick reading.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Want to see more reviews on this item?
 Go to Amazon.com to see all 65 reviews  3.1 out of 5 stars 
 
 
Most recent customer reviews











Only search this product's reviews



Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback