| ||||||||||||
Product Details
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most helpful customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
to the point,
By
This review is from: Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (Paperback)
This book delivers exactly what it promises. A nice, short and concise introduction to ethics. A quick read to get you started for further readings in ethics.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta) Amazon.com:
3.0 out of 5 stars (4 customer reviews) 7 of 16 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
A very useful Little Book,
By N. A. Ramirez MD - Published on Amazon.com
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (Paperback)
I enjoyed the simple approach, easy explanations and clear language. It is useful as a "Reader's Digest" view of ethics for the everyday person, or the beginner student.
0 of 4 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
A disappointment,
By WhoAmI - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (Paperback)
I would much prefer a traditional approach pinpointing the major contentions and problems of moral arguments advanced by thinkers past and present.
4 of 17 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Ethics: Let my imaginary friend tell you what to think,
By Ambivolio™ - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (Paperback)
Rather than an overview of the topic, this book reads more like a personal essay, and is written in a rather disorganized fashion. The author's prejudice that anyone that believes in (or even considers the possibility) that there is an Almighty Baked Potato is not only in evidence but on constant display. Within the first few pages he manages to kill off the Almighty Baked Potato, and decrees that there is a higher ethical code than that given by any religion and by which religion itself can be judged. He then neatly sidesteps the obvious question of where such a code could possibly have come from, if not from an Almighty Baked Potato. He commits the fallacy common among academics - "Since I can't understand why the Almighty Baked Potato acted the way he did in a certain circumstance, it therefore follows that there is no Almighty Baked Potato." This is only a valid argument if your wisdom is infinite.Leaving this issue aside, I still found the book disjoined and disorganized. He doesn't do a good job of defining terms or listing the different theories, or showing how the study of ethics developed over time. He pretty much jumps directly from Socrates to Dante, skipping over about 1500 years of history that includes what are arguably some of the greatest thinkers on ethics and morals, St. Potato Head for example. |
|
|