CDN$ 48.88 + CDN$ 3.49 shipping
In Stock. Sold by pathfinder1st
+ CDN$ 3.49 shipping
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by usedsalesca
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: *** Please check Region before ordering ***, All Discs are inspected and guaranteed. All dispatched with 1 - 3 working days from the UK
Compare Offers on Amazon
Add to Cart
CDN$ 49.31
+ CDN$ 3.49 shipping
Sold by: tonypotenza
Add to Cart
CDN$ 51.26
+ CDN$ 3.49 shipping
Sold by: thebookcommunity_ca
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

The Lord of the Flies (Widescreen) (Sous-titres français) [Import]

3.1 out of 5 stars 103 customer reviews

Price: CDN$ 48.88
Only 1 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by pathfinder1st.
5 new from CDN$ 48.88 8 used from CDN$ 10.99
Unlimited FREE Two-Day Shipping for Six Months When You Try Amazon Student

Frequently Bought Together

  • The Lord of the Flies (Widescreen) (Sous-titres français) [Import]
  • +
  • Lord of the Flies (The Criterion Collection)
Total price: CDN$ 81.08
Buy the selected items together

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Product Details

  • Actors: Balthazar Getty, Chris Furrh, Danuel Pipoly, James Badge Dale, Andrew Taft
  • Directors: Harry Hook
  • Writers: Jay Presson Allen, William Golding
  • Producers: David V. Lester, Jeffrey Bydalek, Lewis M. Allen, Lewis Newman, Peter Allen
  • Format: Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DVD-Video, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC, Import
  • Language: English
  • Subtitles: Spanish, French
  • Region: Region 1 (US and Canada This DVD will probably NOT be viewable in other countries. Read more about DVD formats.)
  • Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • MPAA Rating: R
  • Studio: Fox Video (Canada) Limited
  • Release Date: Nov. 20 2001
  • Run Time: 90 minutes
  • Average Customer Review: 3.1 out of 5 stars 103 customer reviews
  • ASIN: B00005O06X
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

Product Description

Harry Hook's adaptation is not as faithful to the William Golding novel as you'd wish (they excised the Lord of the Flies dialogue with Simon!) and because of it, the movie is less allegorical and less resonant. A group of young men from a military academy are stranded on an island. The group quickly becomes fractious with a passive section led by Ralph, trying to get rescued, and a hunter faction, led by Jack, trying to procure meat and "have fun." Peter Brook's 1963 filming seemed to get closer to the Darwinist sense of this cultural disintegration. Here, the hunter faction seems more like Peter Pan's Lost Boys than the bloodthirsty murderers they are. The performances, particularly young Getty, don't quite carry the weight of the situation. It's still, however, sobering to slowly watch the school uniforms traded for war paint, and the little boys turn into little savages. --Keith Simanton --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: VHS Tape
I saw the movie before I read the book so here is my short review. Overall the movie was nice and sweet, a story about a group of children stranded on an uninhabited island without adult supervision who become savages and lose touch with civilization. The only three who maintain reason are Ralph (the initial leader who tries to always maintain a fire), Simon (the good pure child who suffers a tragic ending, and Piggy (the conscience of the group). The others Jack and his tribe eventually become wild and barbaric with fear of a monster and a primal urge to hunt. The good versus the evil is obviously seen in this movie. However, the symbolic pig's head, the glasses and Simon are dulled down in the movie as opposed to the book. Moreover, Ralph and Jack seem too buddy buddy at first and seem to agree to much and then all of a sudden split apart. The last scene though is the best in the movie. There is a huge fire in the island set by Jack and his tribe as they hunt down for Ralph as they would a pig. The music and the way it was filmed with slowmotion and the perspectives really shocked me and kept me with my breath caught. The ending was too short though and the acting was good. The actors who played Ralph and Jack did a superb job, especially the Ralph actor who is so damned cute and looks a lot like the kid on the cover of the book by Sir William. Simon could have received a bigger role in the movie and the kid who played Piggy was annoying at times but I truly felt bad for him when his glasses fell and he they threw that rock at him that was crazy. So watch the movie it's pretty good and then pick up the book if you haven't read it.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: VHS Tape
Seeing the 1960 version of the film actually prompted me to read the novel. Upon finishing that I thought that seeing the "modern" version would tie the package up nicely. Boy, was I wrong. Watching this version only angered me. The basic premise of the book was that these boys were alone and scared even when they tried to be as civilalized as possible. The boys in this film act as if nothing was even wrong at times. The biggest disapointment is the lost of the "fear of the beast." Reading the book (or even watching the 1960 version) you get a real feeling of fear surrounding the beast. You actually fear the beast. This film only mentions that fear in passing. Gone are the terror filled nights with the "littuns" screaming in the dark, afraid of what might be out there. Also gone is the dramtic conversation in which Simon (our "good and pure" character) meets the Lord of the Flies. This is a MAJOR part in the novel, but is only seen for about 1.5 seconds in this movie. There are other things of course which will just bother you also, the swearing, the changing of names, the changing of ages, etc... About the only thing this movie really has going for it is the beautiful slow motion scenes-the first "tribe dance" and the "hunting of ralph"- are breathtaking scenes. If anything, see the movie for that. So this movie is in color as opposed to the black and white. For this film the added color doesn't make up for its lack of content. Get the older version.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: DVD
lord of the flies is one of the best books ever written if not the best. The movie strangly is just as good as the book, no better no worse. Its an amazing tale of a bunch of little boys who get stranded on an island and baby THIS AINT GILIGANS ISLAND. They start out trying to act like their parents would until a plane comes to take them home but things go on for longer than they thought it would and they begin to fight and after a while tribal instincts take over and they get violent. They have a total complete loss of innocence. As a matter of fact they have a total loss of civilization (except for one or two characters, who are just trying to keep from getting killed and get home). Kids stranded on Island, kids miss home, kids forget home, kids go insane... Its one of those movies that at the end you are left wondering how the children would ever be able to live outside of mental institution walls again and you pretty much gather that the majority will be put in maximum security mental hospitals shortly after coming home because they had totally lost it and you wonder how it is broken to the parents thats children were savagly murdered by their schoolmates. Its mind trippy. It will stick with you for the rest of your life...
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse
Format: DVD
I read the novel three times in my life. Once when I was about ten, then in high school, then again as an adult. When I was ten I saw it as more an adventure story. When in high school, it was more the battle over good and evil. As an adult I read it and saw it as how man(not boys) are truly towards eachother.
Then I saw the movies(both) Even though the first movie had its flaws(Simon seeing the pig head as the lord of the flies, but in the movie the skull never seems to speek to him as it does in the book) it was a better representation of the novel.
In the American version when the boys are dancing around the fire as little savages the main detractor is what they are wearing...Boys underwear with cartoons and pictures. It made it more humorous than shocking. (humorous because many parents let thier young sons at this age walk around home in this 'form' of dress) It would have been better if they just had their wornout and ripped pants. This would have shown thier fall into savagary better, like the first movie did. The main reason is it shows they are growing out of what they had known and it is wearing and tearing away.
The Rivalry between Ralph and Jack is very different, they seem to agree too much then split apart too build up to the separation of the boys
The character of Simon in this version was only a very minor part. Even though the book has him learning who the real 'Beast' is.......them.
As is usual for a novel turned Movie.....READ THE BOOK
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse

Most recent customer reviews