For the Roses: Amazon.ca: Julie Garwood, Megan Gallagher: Books

Product Description

From Amazon

Mary Rose Clayborne is as well-protected by her four adoptive brothers as any woman in Blue Belle, Montana could be--until Lord Harrison Stanford MacDonald comes to town and she finds herself falling in love. How can Mary Rose keep her family together and learn to accept Harrison's questionable past? This story of love and adventure in the Old West will keep you turning the pages. --This text refers to the Mass Market Paperback edition.

From Publishers Weekly

This romance set in mid-19th-century Montana spent two weeks on PW's bestseller list.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to the Mass Market Paperback edition.

See all Product Description

Tag this product

(What's this?)

Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.

Customer Reviews

46 Reviews

5 star:		(40)
4 star:		(2)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(2)

Average Customer Review

4.7 out of 5 stars (46 customer reviews)

Share your thoughts with other customers:

Create your own review

Most helpful customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Great Romance with REAL Family Values, July 15 2004

By

Melissa McCauley (North Little Rock, AR) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)

This review is from: For the Roses (Mass Market Paperback)

There are many reasons to like this book, but my favorite aspect is that it shows a non-traditional family full of love and respect. Three orphaned boys find a little girl in a trash pile and band together to raise her as their sister. The romance element of the book is good, as well as the part where Mary Rose finds her biological father, but the relationships of Mary Rose and her four unconventional brothers are what make this book a must read.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Report abuse

5.0 out of 5 stars One of my Favorite books, Jun 23 2004

By A Customer

This review is from: For the Roses (Mass Market Paperback)

I loved this book so much that I have read it twice. The other boks in the series, dont' even match up, and really are just too predictable.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Report abuse

5.0 out of 5 stars A Rose Fan, Jan 15 2004

By A Customer

This review is from: For the Roses (Mass Market Paperback)

I read For the Roses and the other books in the series a few years ago and I have re-read them because they are that good.
Although I do like romance this is not just a romantic story it much more than that. It about family and love and respect, I loved it.
The reason why I have taken the time to write this review is I have just seen the movie ROSEHILL that was adapted by Hallmark (WHAT A DISAPPOINTMENT THAT WAS). Avoid at all cost, the essence and heart of the story has being destroyed the humour was taken out of the story, you would not recognise Mary Rose who was made out to be a jealous person who disregarded the men who raise her.The men did not appear to really bond together like in the book, what happen to Harrison he did not exist in the movie and the most unforgivable act was that they KILL OFF COLE. Enjoy the book forget the movie trust me on this one.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Report abuse

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 46 customer reviews on Amazon.ca

Want to see more reviews on this item?

› Go to Amazon.com to see all 94 reviews 4.4 out of 5 stars

Most recent customer reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars The Best Book I've Ever Read
I first read this book many years ago and I still continue to reread it till this day. It's a romance story that will withstand the test of time. Read more

Published on Nov 24 2003 by Cathy Wright

5.0 out of 5 stars One of the best yet
One of the best books I have ever read. I own every single one of Julie Garwoods books and this one had me drawn in the most.

Published on Aug 27 2003