Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Fortitude Hardcover – Jul 27 1999


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover, Jul 27 1999
CDN$ 0.79

Join Amazon Student in Canada


NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 513 pages
  • Publisher: Time Warner UK (July 27 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0316851728
  • ISBN-13: 978-0316851725
  • Product Dimensions: 23.4 x 16.4 x 4.8 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 862 g
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)


Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

By A Customer on Dec 2 2002
Format: Hardcover
I'm a big fan of this topic area, yet had to force myself to keep reading this one until I finally gave up. The problem is that the author writes this as really an "after-action report" to his superiors, so the prose is extremely heavy on orginizational details. Just to give you a flavor, here are passages from two pages chosen at random:
(1, p. 91): "It now became necessary to provide FUSAG with armies of its own. This wa done on the one hand by fictitiously detaching the First Canadian Army from 21 Army Group and putting it under the command of FUSAG"
(2, p. 275):"Under the new scheme, Three would be at the head, 7(2) would be called in to act as freelance, taking the place of Seven in that respect. The territory of 7 (4) would be enlarged to include Kent as well as Sussex, thus filling the gap caused by 7 (2)'s departure. 7(7) and 3(3) would continue as before, the former in the Eastern counties and the latter in Scotland".
I hope you get my point - authoritative and detailed, but not exactly a page-turner.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Format: Hardcover
For WWII buffs this book will prove to be invaluable. The level of detail (specifically quotes from actually documents and interviews with captured German generals)will intrigue anyone who has ever wondered how we managed to get a foot hold in Europe in 1944.
The only negatives associated with this book are the lack of writing style (this man was, actually, not a professional writer) and a certain amount of data overload concerning formations, locations, and dates.
My suggestion is to read it slowly and don't mind if you find yourself skipping of a an Armoured Division here or an Infantry Division there. Just keep track of the narrative and you will be surprised at how 'tight' the story ends up being. Also, don't forget to skim the appendicies for some interesting perspective on how experts 'thought' the war in Europe would go.
Overall this is an excellent book for interested parties. If you don't have a strong interest in WWII or spycraft I would consider lighter fare.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Format: Hardcover
This book is very detailed. "The author actually wrote the account at the end of the war, but its publication was delayed until the principal participants died or came out of hiding." (Thats all I should have to say.) I would highly recommend this book (hence the 5/5 stars). They fooled Hitler, Rommel, and the German High Command. How? Well, read this baby and you'll know how. (Project Fortitude) This goes beyond the inflatable tanks, fake radio broadcasts, double agents, spies, and etc. There are several intresting documents, too. I read and purchase several history books and documentaries. I must admit that I’m only 3/4 through. This book is worth the money!!! I could yap on instead check out an excerpt. Have FUN :-)
Chapter One
Early Planning
The decision to invade France in 1944 was taken at the Casablanca Conference in January 1943. General Morgan was appointed Chief of Staff to the future Supreme Commander and established his headquarters at Norfolk House, St James's Square, in April of that year. On 26th April he received a directive from the Combined Chiefs of Staff which, besides instructing him to prepare plans for a full-scale assault against the Continent as early as possible in 1944 and for a return to the Continent in the event of German disintegration at any time, also demanded `an elaborate camouflage and deception scheme extending over the whole summer with a view to pinning the enemy in the West and keeping alive the expectation of large-scale cross-Channel operations in 1943. This would include at least one amphibious feint with the object of bringing on an air battle employing the Metropolitan Air Force and the Eighth US Air Force.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 7 reviews
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful
VERY dry Dec 2 2002
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
I'm a big fan of this topic area, yet had to force myself to keep reading this one until I finally gave up. The problem is that the author writes this as really an "after-action report" to his superiors, so the prose is extremely heavy on orginizational details. Just to give you a flavor, here are passages from two pages chosen at random:
(1, p. 91): "It now became necessary to provide FUSAG with armies of its own. This wa done on the one hand by fictitiously detaching the First Canadian Army from 21 Army Group and putting it under the command of FUSAG"
(2, p. 275):"Under the new scheme, Three would be at the head, 7(2) would be called in to act as freelance, taking the place of Seven in that respect. The territory of 7 (4) would be enlarged to include Kent as well as Sussex, thus filling the gap caused by 7 (2)'s departure. 7(7) and 3(3) would continue as before, the former in the Eastern counties and the latter in Scotland".
I hope you get my point - authoritative and detailed, but not exactly a page-turner.
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Inside account and thorough but a little dry Oct. 20 2002
By Pablo Aguirre - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
For WWII buffs this book will prove to be invaluable. The level of detail (specifically quotes from actually documents and interviews with captured German generals)will intrigue anyone who has ever wondered how we managed to get a foot hold in Europe in 1944.
The only negatives associated with this book are the lack of writing style (this man was, actually, not a professional writer) and a certain amount of data overload concerning formations, locations, and dates.
My suggestion is to read it slowly and don't mind if you find yourself skipping of a an Armoured Division here or an Infantry Division there. Just keep track of the narrative and you will be surprised at how 'tight' the story ends up being. Also, don't forget to skim the appendicies for some interesting perspective on how experts 'thought' the war in Europe would go.
Overall this is an excellent book for interested parties. If you don't have a strong interest in WWII or spycraft I would consider lighter fare.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
They fooled Hitler, Rommel, and the German High Command. July 16 2001
By "slicksteve" - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
This book is very detailed. "The author actually wrote the account at the end of the war, but its publication was delayed until the principal participants died or came out of hiding." (Thats all I should have to say.) I would highly recommend this book (hence the 5/5 stars). They fooled Hitler, Rommel, and the German High Command. How? Well, read this baby and you'll know how. (Project Fortitude) This goes beyond the inflatable tanks, fake radio broadcasts, double agents, spies, and etc. There are several intresting documents, too. I read and purchase several history books and documentaries. I must admit that I’m only 3/4 through. This book is worth the money!!! I could yap on instead check out an excerpt. Have FUN :-)
Chapter One
Early Planning
The decision to invade France in 1944 was taken at the Casablanca Conference in January 1943. General Morgan was appointed Chief of Staff to the future Supreme Commander and established his headquarters at Norfolk House, St James's Square, in April of that year. On 26th April he received a directive from the Combined Chiefs of Staff which, besides instructing him to prepare plans for a full-scale assault against the Continent as early as possible in 1944 and for a return to the Continent in the event of German disintegration at any time, also demanded `an elaborate camouflage and deception scheme extending over the whole summer with a view to pinning the enemy in the West and keeping alive the expectation of large-scale cross-Channel operations in 1943. This would include at least one amphibious feint with the object of bringing on an air battle employing the Metropolitan Air Force and the Eighth US Air Force.' The deception plans which were prepared in compliance with that instruction and which received the name of COCKADE do not strictly lie within the scope of this report. Nevertheless, as they had a bearing upon subsequent events, a short account is included.
COCKADE had two distinct objects: to contain German forces in North-Western Europe, thus preventing them from being used on the active fronts, and to destroy German aircraft. The plan comprised three connected operations: TINDALL, the threat of a landing in Norway; STARKEY, of a landing in the Pas de Calais; and WADHAM, of one in the Bay of Biscay. STARKEY and WADHAM, so the story ran, were to be complementary operations. After the bridgehead in the Pas de Calais had been established by British forces, an American landing was to take place in Western France with the object of opening Brest, which could then be used to land troops sailing direct from the United States. The forces in the United Kingdom being held inadequate to support all three plans, the French and Norwegian assaults were presented as alternative undertakings. STARKEY was the most important part of COCKADE inasmuch as it included an elaborate embarkation exercise by 21 Army Group in which the landing craft actually sailed to within a few miles of the French coast, as well as real air attacks against the Pas de Calais. TINDALL and WADHAM relied mainly on the use of wireless, dummy devices and controlled leakage.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Lots of information but dry and oft confusing telling Feb. 27 2009
By Mannie Liscum - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Roger Hesketh's Fortitude: The D-Day Deception Campaign is 513 pages (inclusive of Appendices and Index) of important history, if told with little literary flair. Fortitude: The D-Day Deception Campaign is certainly not a book for the faint of heart who are looking for a Second World War `page-turner'. Hesketh provides the reader with considerable information, and having `been there' as one deeply involved he achieves his basic task fully. Where he fails is in the generation of a prose that keeps the reader invested. One would think that the topic at hand - Allied and Axis agents, double agents, real and false deceptions, etc. - would lend itself well to a kind of story telling that would read more like a thriller than dry history, but unfortunately this does not happen. Instead the story is dry and matter-of-fact, full of history but often difficult to trudge through.

Much of what happened during the course of the various phases/components of Fortitude was itself confusing, purposely so to deceive the Germans; however, Hesketh does make much of this any less confusing in his telling of events. He follows a nice timeline for the most part (deviating where important to do so, and justifying such moves) but such consistency alone does not clarify many of the issues that are likely to confuse the reader. This point is especially true when Hesketh discusses the major double-cross (XX) agent players (GARBO and BRUTUS) and their sub-agents. Take GARBO (in reality Spaniard Juan Pujol Garcia; see Mary Kathryn Barbier's D-Day Deception: Operation Fortitude and the Normandy Invasion (Stackpole Military History Series)) as an example; GARBO `recruited and employed' a large network of subagents who provided him with intelligence from various locations within the United Kingdom. In fact, only GARBO himself was a real person, all of his subagents were completely fictional. While Hesketh points this out, this fact must be kept in the forefront of the readers mind since he story evolves in such a way that real and fantasy are blurred into a continuum of grey. If the story of GARBO at the time of the Second World War was half as confusing as it is on paper in Hesketh's book, the Abwehr and German High Command must have been fooled indeed. Again one would think that it should be possible to tell the story of such an important component of Fortitude (Hesketh rightfully gives the majority of credit for the `success' of Fortitude to the XX agents) in way that the reader can see the confusion caused without being confused.

All is not bad with Fortitude: The D-Day Deception Campaign however. Assuming one can deal with the dryness and potential confusion, there is a tremendous history here told by a primary participant. Moreover, to date no superior re-counting/history of Fortitude has made its way to the wider public. Mary Kathryn Barbier's D-Day Deception: Operation Fortitude and the Normandy Invasion (Stackpole Military History Series) is a most recent attempt that suffers in many ways from the same criticisms raised of Hesketh's book, and provide little new information for the serious student. So in the final analysis, Fortitude: The D-Day Deception Campaign is a story packed with information for the serious student of WWII history and military deception in general, but is presented in a way that will likely fail to engage the casual reader. Rating: 4 stars for information/historical content, 1.5 stars for presentation and prose; 3 stars total.
Worth the effort May 6 2013
By David - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This book was heavy going but if your a fan of WW2 history then it is well worth the effort to have a better understanding of the subject.

Product Images from Customers

Search


Feedback