2.0 out of 5 stars
For me, very disappointing, Mar 2 2004
Wow! I'm astonished that everyone else liked this so much. For me, watching Ruth Yancey Fox ruthlessly destroy the lives of everyone in her family was just too depressing. I probably wouldn't have even finished this if I hadn't been on vacation. I thought Ruth should have had her comeuppance a lot earlier in the story, and then there would have been a LITTLE more joy and happiness instead of grinding misery for the whole damn book. I also thought the depiction of the black servants was a bit racist and patronizing. (The old warmhearted-but-dimwitted stereotype.)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
my review, Jun 3 2002
I have already read many books from this author, and I have enjoyed each and every one. This was no exception.
This book is very entertaining and the plot keeps us hooked until the very end. The characters are alive and well liked or disliked, in Ruth's case.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
PFG & VV...if you've read the book, you know what it means.., Jan 12 2004
By A Customer
PFG: the writing. Wow. Lush, vivid, rushing forward and pulling you with it...you cannot put this melodrama down. I give it five stars for sheer entertainment.
PFG: the characters. Siddons is a great psychological writer. She gives individualistic sketches of several characters that could be textbook, especially the screamingly psychotic sociopath Ruth Yancey-Fox. Yikes.
PFG: the first several chapters, describing the Yancey family.
It's as perfect as novel-writing can be right up until Ruth is adopted into the Fox family. Then it gets "Gone With the Wind"-y and "Little Foxes"-y. It continues to mesmerize, but is never as good as those first chapters.
V.V.: Descriptions of good ol' black folks who still like to dance on the old plantation 'cause they's devoted to their massahs - ugh. Demeaning, stereotypical, crap. Made me want to throw up.
V.V.: Rip, the black woman who "knows" the sickie Ruth almost in the biblical sense: we are set up to believe that she has some magical powers to "protect" Ruth's offspring, but in fact she never does do a damn thing to help them. She's always "lookin' out" for her "chirren," but I found that she was basically in collusion with Ruth. It's like the old saying: "If you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem." She watched Ruth do horrible things, including murder, and never said a word. Her rationalization, at the end, that "Who would believe me?" just didn't cut it. She had power in that household, too. Even if they didn't believe her, she should have had the guts to spill to beans...or the chitlins, or whatever.
V.V.: Tying up the whole thing in letters from Ruth at the end was a highly unbelievable contrivance. But by then you were just happy to have the fascinating story end. As good as it is, it gets on your nerves after a while. I found Nell, the final heroine, to be a milksop. But in the end, too, it's a good sister story. If you've ever had a female sibling rival and made up when you found out how sick the grownups were, you'll probably love it.
PFG: Painterly descriptions.
V.V.: Location, Location, Location. The South doesn't get more nauseating than this.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No