2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
Brilliant, but not for all tastes, Mar 25 2004
This review is from: Freedom and Necessity (Paperback)
I note that most of the reviewers who gave this low ratings begin with "Epistolary novels are boring" or "I don't like Victorian settings". So look: this is a story told through letters and journal entries and it is set in the mid-1800s. Got that? If you can't stand either of those, this may not be the book for you. It also delves into philosophy (hence the title) and the politics of the time, and by the way it contains the best love letter *ever* and the best romance story since Dorothy Sayers' Gaudy Night. There are a few loose ends that could have been better tied up, and I really wish Bull and Brust had done a better job with the alternate universe subplot; as another reviewer has pointed out, the Golden Bough-type myths are hinted at but it is never clear whether there's anything to them in the world of the story, or whether Kitty's experiments are anything more than hallucinations. The story is not weakened if the magic some characters believe in is mythical, but a bit more exposition would be nice. Otherwise, just brilliant.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Thumping Good Read, Feb 24 2003
This review is from: Freedom and Necessity (Paperback)
Okay, I stole that line from "A Common Reader", but it seems appropriate!
Espistlatory novels, works written in the form of a series of letters and diary entries, are rather old-fashioned. They were very popular back in Victorian times but rather less so nowadays. To many they seem contrived. But consider this: this is a novel set in the Victorian Age. What better way to pay homage to the time then to attempt to copy the style and the verbage of that time? This is one of the many glories, great and small, of this novel and I raise my glass to Brust and Bull for it.
The cast of the novel is fairly large by modern standards but much curtailed for Dickens and his ilk; there are essentially four main characters (James Cobham, a ex-Chartist part-time anarchist, Kitty Holbourn, devoutee of the arcane, Richard Cobham, James' cousin and erstwhile lover of Kitty, and Susan Voight, 'an houri in practical shoes and sensible stays'). The plot revolves around several points, but primarily it is a mystery -- James falls from a boat, is assumed drowned, and yet finds himself very much alive and working in an inn as a stablehand several months after the event.
Working in and out from here are possible faery sightings, would-be Satanists, or at least individuals bent on human sacrifice, a possible government conspiracy, a traitor in the Chartist movement that may have led to the unravelling of the abortive revolutions of 1848, and even a wonderfully drawn appearance by Friedrich Engels. The characterizations are sharp, the descriptions clear, the manners superb; I never heard a false note in the cadences of voice and manner through the book, no sense of the 20th century imposing itself on the 19th. I ended up truly caring what happened to the characters and wondering what had happened to force them into their current horrible predicaments.
I can recommend this novel as a great fun read, a wild ride, and not a half-bad intro into certain aspect of the mid-19th century, at least as far as England is concerned.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Brilliant Piece of Fiction, Feb 22 2003
By A Customer
This review is from: Freedom and Necessity (Paperback)
This is one of the best books I've read in quite some time, and I highly recommend it - but perhaps not to everyone. It definitly requires patience to read a epistolary novel, particularly one written in the style of the 19th century. It also requires a certain amount of knowledge of mid-19th century European history and philosophy. The philosophical element in particular could be a hurdle for some. There are references to Hegel throughout the book, and without at least some rudimentary knowledge of Hegel these would make little sense to most readers. The many negative reviews this book has received suggest that these are problems for some readers.
If you can get past these potential problems, however, you will find a brilliant piece of literature. The plot is very complex, the characters are all interesting, and the style is fascinating. The epistolary style forces the reader to read between the lines much more than in a normal narritive, since you have to realize that there are some things that the writer may not be saying, or may be saying that are not completely honest. Brust and Bull pull this off extremely well, and are further able to create distinct writing styles for each of the four main characters.
I would also mention that one should not expect the usual from Brust and Bull. This is a very different book from their other works, especially in style. Also, note that this is NOT a fantasy novel.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No