Friction: How Radicalization Happens to Them and Us and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
CDN$ 41.57
  • List Price: CDN$ 45.50
  • You Save: CDN$ 3.93 (9%)
Usually ships within 1 to 2 months.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Friction: How Radicalization Happens to Them and Us Hardcover – Mar 16 2011


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
CDN$ 41.57
CDN$ 35.81 CDN$ 50.17

Up to 90% Off Textbooks

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought



Product Details

  • Hardcover: 248 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press (March 16 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0199747431
  • ISBN-13: 978-0199747436
  • Product Dimensions: 23.6 x 2 x 16.3 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 544 g
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #216,597 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

Review


"McCauley and Moskalenko markedly advance and order our understanding of how individuals are radicalized and why the process often yields terrorists. The authors impart needed discipline and common sense to a field where abstract theory unconnected to reality often dominates. Most important, the authors describe and analyze the very personal, dramatic, disorienting, and frequently searing experiences that put men and women on radicalization's path." --Michael Scheuer, former senior officer, Central Intelligence Agency; Adjunct Professor, Security Studies Program, Georgetown University; and author of Imperial Hubris and Osama bin Laden


"Anyone concerned with predicting or intervening against intergroup violence should read this book. The authors engagingly present a wide range of case studies to show how individuals, groups, and mass publics are mobilized for political conflict." --Todd Leventhal, Director of Interagency Strategic Communication Network, U.S. Department of State


"In this brilliant book, McCauley and Moskalenko exploit our interest in true crime stories to help us overcome our inability to think objectively about the Islamic terrorism we are now battling. They tell us stories about the first modern terrorist group, fighting the Czar in the late 19th century, and then show us the same patterns at work in American homegrown terrorists and Islamic terrorists. This is social psychology at its best dramatic stories exemplifying accessible theories, backed up by clever experiments and set into multiple historical contexts. You'll understand terrorists for the first time, and you'll see how we can best thwart their goals by refusing to play their game." --Jonathan Haidt, Professor of Psychology, University of Virginia, and author of The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom


"McCauley and Moskalenko present a vivid, theoretically grounded, and historically wide-ranging account of the social psychological processes that can drive ordinary people to radicalization and violence. The analysis skillfully illuminates a complex phenomenon without trivializing or over-simplifying, and its emphasis on the reciprocal dynamics of conflict adds critical balance. In comparing the Russian revolutionary movement of the nineteenth century to contemporary extremist groups of assorted persuasions, the authors have produced an impressively thorough and compelling explanation of the intricate mechanisms behind the resort to violence in the service of a cause." --Martha Crenshaw, Senior Fellow, Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, and author of Explaining Terrorism: Causes, Processes and Consequences


"What do militants of the old Russian terrorist group, People's Will, and current-day Al Qaeda have in common? Going beyond stereotypes of terrorists' pathological personalities, this book presents compelling evidence of a complex set of causal mechanisms working at the individual and group levels. In many and diverse contexts, this book shows the importance of identification and politicization processes in transforming grievances into action in underground violent organizations." --Donatella Della Porta, Professor of Sociology, European University Institute, and author of Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany


"People commonly react to horrendous acts of violence such as the 9/11 attacks by searching for explanations that focus on the culprits. In strong contrast, McCauley and Moskalenko argue that terrorism is fueled by the friction between radical extremists and the individuals and ideas they oppose. This thoughtful, yet readable, book shows that horrendous or not, terrorists cannot escape basic principles of social psychology- but then, neither can the rest of us." --Gary LaFree, Director, National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), and author of Losing Legitimacy: Street Crime and the Decline of Social Institutions in America


"In this excellent book, the authors describe the personal experiences and psychology of individuals, as well as the dynamics of groups, which lead to radicalization. Mechanisms of radicalization- including personal and political grievances, ideals, inducement by friends, the attractions of risk-taking and status, and the interdependence of people in groups-are highlighted through stories of terrorists in earlier times and today. This is a compelling, highly readable book that offers impressive understanding of terrorist individuals and groups." --Ervin Staub, Founding Director, Psychology of Peace and Violence Program, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and author of Overcoming Evil: Genocide, Violent Conflict, and Terrorism


"So much has been written about radicalization that is generic or apocryphal that the field needs desperately to find a contribution that is systematic, research-based, clear, and persuasive. And that is the task that McCauley and Moskalenko have taken on, and triumphantly achieved. The book works analytically; it works because it tells the tales of the violent and radicalized comprehensively, and it works because it does not just focus on 'them', but on 'us, and on the inter-relationship. In short, it is the most important book written on this complex and politicized subject to date." --Stuart Croft, Professor of International Security, Warwick University, UK, and author of Culture, Crisis and America's War on Terror


"This book introduces twelve mechanisms that underlie political radicalization and lead to violence and terrorism. In their highly systematic yet readable account, the authors identify mechanisms that can be found at work in every terrorist group, whatever its ideology. The authors provide new and effective tools for understanding political events, and for recognizing and controlling the extent to which radicalization affects all of us. Cases of modern and 19th century terrorists are interwoven to offer vividness and historical depth." -- Ifat Maoz, Director, Smart Communications Institute, Hebrew University of Israel


"Weaving historical narrative and psychological theory effectively and, at times, dramatically, the authors provide a holistic approach to one of the most vexing challenges of our time. Written in a refreshingly accessible and readable style, the book will appeal to scholars, practitioners, and general readers alike." --Paul J. Smith, Associate Professor, National Security Decision Making Department, U.S. Naval War College, and author of The Terrorism Ahead: Confronting Transnational Violence in the 21st Century


"This remarkably ingenious and enlightening book looks at how radical terrorists are formed. What is so novel is that it compares at great length the Russian revolutionaries, who tried to overthrow the Czarist regime in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, to the Islamist terrorists who now occupy our attention. The authors show how strongly terrorists believe in what they are doing, how committed they are, and how difficult it is to defeat them even when many of them are killed. This book will help us see more clearly what we are up against, and what we might need to do to limit the damage." --Daniel Chirot, Tamaki Professor of International Studies, Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies, University of Washington, and author of Why Not Kill Them All? The Logic and Prevention of Mass Political Murder


"Both long-term students of political violence and a more general readership will find this book fascinating. It will not only be used in the classroom, but (at least in my personal case) be kept on the shelf as a reference book on key social psychological mechanisms of political radicalization. In my opinion, no other work so smoothly integrates a sophisticated treatment of social psychology into the important, and poorly understood, subject of political violence and terrorism." --Roger Petersen, Arthur and Ruth Sloan Chair of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and author of Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, Resentment in Twentieth Century Eastern Europe


"McCauley (Why Not Kill Them All?), co-director of the Solomon Asch Center for the Study or Ethnopolitical Conflict, and Moskalenko, a research fellow at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, seek a more complex discussion of terrorism, and methodically examine radicalizationEL. A better understanding of the mechanisms under which terrorism thrives can lead to more efficacious counter-terrorism policies. A valuable contribution to the ongoing dialogue." --Publishers Weekly


"Written for the lay reader, with recommended reading lists after each chapter, Friction takes a well-integrated and thoughtful approach to the many drivers of unrest and upheaval. It offers valuable insights to students of history, politics, psychology, and war." -- Elissa Malcohn, Psych Central


"This book may be of value for students in various introductory, and even some advanced, university courses. Instructors in criminal justice, sociology, political science, and psychology may want to consider this volume for their classes' reading lists." -- Frederick J. Frese, PhD, PsycCRITIQUES


"Friction takes a refreshingly newer look at radicalization, and it should be on the list of every reader who is interested in studying and understanding radicalization. Everyone who is fighting against radicalized individuals should read this book so they have a baseline understanding of what they are up against and how individuals who are radicalized can take a perceived wrongdoing from an event in their childhood or early adulthood and use that event as a foundation for radicalization later in life. On a positive note, if one
wants to radicalize others for the good of humanity, reading this book will help him or her understand what is involved in motivating others to join a cause and find passion for that cause." -- Dr. Robin L. Thompson, NASA Counterintelligence Office, Journal of Strategic Security


"The beauty of Friction is in the organization and writing. McCauley and Moskalenko discuss twelve radicalization mechanisms distinguished at three levels: individual, group, and mass radicalization. To illustrate these mechanisms, the authors liberally sprinkle a wide range of cases throughout the book that take the reader back and forth from the nineteenth century to the present and across many political contexts and cultures... Friction is an excellent book to introduce a widerange of students to research on radicalism and can also serve as a springboard to new research that fills gaps they highlight in existing explanations of radical politics." -- Robert Futrell, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Journal Mobilization


About the Author

Clark McCauley is Rachel C. Hale Professor of Sciences and Mathematics and Co-Director of the Solomon Asch Center for the Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict at Bryn Mawr College. He received his Ph.D. in social psychology from the University of Pennsylvania in 1970. With Dan Chirot he co-authored Why Not Kill Them All? The Logic and Prevention of Mass Political Murder, published by Princeton University Press in 2006. He is founding editor of the journal Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide. Sophia Moskalenko is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (NC-START) and a consultant with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. She received her Ph.D. in social psychology from the University of Pennsylvania in 2004. Her research and publications have focused on group identification, political activism, radicalization, and terrorism.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

By Phillip Taylor on June 20 2011
Format: Hardcover
Length: 2:10 Mins
WHY DO THEY DO IT?
WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT?

An appreciation by Phillip Taylor MBE and Elizabeth Taylor of Richmond Green Chambers

What sets ordinary people, mild mannered students, for example, on the path to radicalization and ultimately to terrorism? How does one find an answer? Or is there an answer? As the authors Clark McCauley and Sophia Moskalenko have rather challengingly put it:

'Focusing on them (the terrorists and their motivations) is not enough. Focusing on us is not enough'. focusing on the dynamics of conflict over time is essential' -- which is exactly what this book and the authors set out to do with this intellectually sparkling statement of modern radicalism.

Both psychologists and consultants to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the authors are acknowledged experts in this field. Extrapolating from their extensive research, they identify 12 mechanisms of radicalisation through which, they assert, unexceptional people are moved to perpetrate exceptional violence. Ideology, they claim, is not necessarily a prime factor in this process. It emerges as more of an excuse for violence, rather than its root cause.

The wealth of specific case material provided in the book touches on a number of terrorist outrages and some obscure ones as well, from the 9/11 atrocities in New York to the Bali bombings, to the July 7 bombings in London. The authors' wide ranging analysis of terrorism goes back to imperial Russia in the late 1800s illustrated by some rather fascinating case histories of individual terrorists.

An interesting aspect of the book is that personal experiences of individuals are examined alongside the dynamics of groups, from which most terrorism seems to emanate.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 5 reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
A Highly Enlightening and Engaging Contribution to the Topic of Terrorism. Oct. 10 2011
By Frederick J. Woods - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
This is a highly informative work that very uniquely combines a largely academic approach but in a very engaging and easily readable format. For those that approach the study of terrorism from an academic perspective this will come as a very pleasant surprise!

Written primarily from a social psychology standpoint but borrowing sometimes from Social Movement Theory (in particular Donatella Della Porta and her work on Italian and German leftist terrorism) FRICTION presents 12 different pathways to radicalization into terrorist activity. The authors present these 12 pathways (grouped into three layers much like Della Porta's Micro, Meso, and Macro levels) in a series of explanatory vignettes using the 19th century Russian leftist terrorist group People's Will juxtaposed with a modern example primarily but not exclusively drawn from Islamic terrorist figures.

In harmony with other recent academic findings, the authors underline the varied nature and goals of terrorism and terrorists by demonstrating the various pathways that can lead individuals to commit violent political acts. Particularly noteworthy are the number of pathways to violent radicalization that could be said to be non-rational in that they are responses neither to ideology nor to political exigencies, but rather to combinations of sometimes subtle social factors such as group dynamics, boundary hardening, and even love. Also in keeping with most modern scholarship on the topic, the authors reject psychopathology as a factor in political radicalization.

This is not a social science work -- the presentation of the 12 pathways appears to be exploratory based on a broad literature review primarily from the social psychology realm. As such, topics such as Political Opportunity Structure are not addressed. Perhaps most unfortunately, a topic I would think social psychology would be well equipped to handle, de-radicalization, is also not addressed.

Overall, a fantastic work.
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Incredible analysis, but terrorism is still left relatively "foreign" March 4 2013
By FR - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
In Friction: How Radicalization Happens to Them and Us, McCauley seeks to explain how terrorists are led to action through mechanisms that are based on emotions and experiences that are common to all humans: love, fear, personal grievance, etc. He claims that Americans could be led through the very same psychological processes to radicalize and indeed, at the end of the work, one is shocked at his or her ability to understand terrorists. If the work is so easy to read and its explanations broach common sense, why does it take 248 pages to explain?

Terrorism is not actually something most of us are familiar with. For most Americans, their understanding of it is predicated on one event, one figurehead, and one non-state acting group.

Domestic terrorism, however, is something we are even less familiar with. Examples date back to abolitionists like John Brown, but these historic figures are not typically referred to as "terrorists" in AP US History textbooks or classes. The last recorded instance of domestic terrorism in America would be the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma State. Personally, I would have been 3 years old.

Mass murder, on the other hand, is something Americans are quite familiar with, especially given the rise and recency of school shootings: Columbine in 1999, Virginia Tech in 2007, and Sandy Hook in 2012. I was 18 when Senator Gabby Giffords and several of her constituents were shot in Tucson, AZ. I was 19 when viewers of the Dark Knight Rises were shot in Denver, CO. I was 20 when Sandy Hook Elementary school children and staffers were shot in Newton, CT. These instances are much more firm in my memory. All of them evade my understanding.

Watching the news at night, we are shown the faces of those behind these events: Jared Lee Loughner, James Holmes, and Adam Lanza. We hear about the lack of humanity, the lack of remorse, and the lack of rage while they committed these acts or when they stand to trial. More important than the fact that they acted without apparent or disclosed reason, they acted with a lack of emotion: they must have been insane.

So, McCauley's alternative explanation for terrorists' acts beyond political motivations isn't instinctive. Our reluctance to identify with terrorists is because we - albeit fortunately - are not familiar with it. We are not used to hearing about American radicals committing violence with some sort of psychological explanation for their acts or rational end in mind. If we liken terrorists to ourselves at all, we liken them to mass murderers, radicals who are most often understood as insane. If an oppressive political structure or coercive regime in power is not the reason for acts of violence, then the actors behind them, to our best guesses, must also be insane.

McCauley's work explains well how this is not the case. If there is one criticism to be had, the book is wanting of examples of domestic terrorists that are seen as heroes today - not just humanitarians in Haiti - or examples of radicals who actually act violently in America for those reasons McCauley claims. In their absence, terrorism is still a "foreign" phenomenon. If modern examples are few, perhaps the reader is due a more cross-cultural explanation or historical analysis on why radicals in America express opinions and would incite violence, but frequently don't. These addendums may be unimportant to the very original point McCauley makes: radicalization is understandable. But it is important to what I think the book is meant to do. Once we better understand why we have a tough time likening terrorists to ourselves, we actually will change how we respond to them and appropriately capitalize on the mistakes of terrorists who anticipate the former enraged responses we will no longer grant. I hope to see McCauley step up to the task.
Great look at radicalization Nov. 18 2013
By Trash Winters - Published on Amazon.com
Verified Purchase
This book was assigned to me for a university course on terrorism. This was a great book for understanding the mindset not only of terrorists and other groups with "extreme" views, such as religious cults, but also understanding group psychology in general. This book was a wonderful look at the political and psychological factors of radicalization - not only how they affect foreign entities such as al Qaeda, but the insidious ways in which radicalization can penetrate (and often has penetrated) our very own society at the personal and governmental levels. Highly recommended even as a casual read. Always remember, terrorism, as a product of radicalization, does not come from some essentialized "evil" or "crazy" mindset, nor is it psychologically foreign - radicalization is something that any group or individual can experience.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Terrorists.... June 20 2011
By Phillip Taylor - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
0 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Right lecture for Christmas Aug. 23 2013
By Mihai-Robert Soran - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
Got it, read it, reviewed it. Grat for the lay readers, helpful to "homeland security" professionals who need a basic refresh, and nice shelf decoration at home for people who already understood whar makes radicals and terrorists.
A good Christmas read.


Feedback