Would you like to see this page in English? Click here.

24 neufs & d'occasion à partir de CDN$ 1.29

Vous en avez un à vendre? Vendez les vôtres ici
 
 
Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science Of Fuzzy Logic (Cloth)
 
 

Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science Of Fuzzy Logic (Cloth) (Paperback)

de BART KOSKO (Author) "Hold an apple in your hand ..." En savoir plus
2.8étoiles sur 5  Voir tous les commentaires (38 évaluations de client)

Offert par ces vendeurs.


3 neufs à partir de CDN$ 27.95 21 d'occasion à partir de CDN$ 1.29
Looking for Textbooks? Save up to 37% on New--and up to 90% on Used
Hit the books in Amazon.ca's Textbook Store and save up to 37% on over 100,000 new textbooks shipped from and sold by Amazon.ca. For even bigger savings, get up to 90% off the list price of thousands of used listings. Learn more.

Les détails du produit


Descriptions du produit

From Publishers Weekly

Kosko , an engineering professor at the University of Southern California, makes a provocative new scientific paradigm intelligible to the general reader. Fuzzy logic posits a world in which absolutes, such as those implied in the words "true" and "false , " are less important and interesting than the matters of degree between them. "Fuzziness is grayness," and "the truth lies in the middle," according to Kosko, one of the pioneers of fuzzy logic theory, which he persuasively presents as a world view rooted more in Buddhist and Taoist assumptions than in the dichotomous Aristotelian tradition. He proposes FATs (Fuzzy Approximation Theorems) for the existence (and non-existence, as fuzziness demands) of God and as models of the abortion debate. In consumer terms, fuzzy logic is behind such "smart" machines as air conditioners and microwave ovens that gauge their operation to the conditions and demands of a given moment's task. Writing with style and risk, Kosko challenges assumptions, not about the existence of scientific authority, but about its nature.
Copyright 1993 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Kirkus Reviews

Aristotle is out and Buddha is in; the law of the excluded middle (either A or not-A) is repealed, and A and not-A together replaces it. No more black and white, right and wrong, true or false. In their place come shades of gray, more or less, maybe so, maybe not. Why? Because the new world of fuzzy logic more closely mirrors reality, has a rigor all its own, and is paying off in the marketplace. Kosko (Electrical Engineering/USC) has been called the ``St. Paul'' of fuzziness, and for good reason: Not only has he contributed major theories and proofs in the development of fuzzy logic, but he's also been a major proselytizer and gadfly, organizing conferences and frequently going on the road (which usually leads to Japan). He's also young...which may account for the passion and posturing that color the text. Indeed, until Kosko gets down to chapter and verse on what FL is and how it works, reader will be put off by the constant put-down of Western logic and philosophy and opposing schools of computer science. But when Kosko is good, he's very, very good. One comes away from his text with a real understanding of the concepts of fuzzy sets, rules, and systems, and of how they're applied to make ``smart'' machines, devices, trains, and planes. He's also good in extending these ideas to neural nets in hypothesizing how brains change, learn, get smart. But toward the end, he plunges big time into metaphysical questions about life, death, cosmology, God (seen as the math- maker). Curious about the future, Kosko says that he'll opt for freezing at death. Still, for all the self-indulgence, probably the best primer around for learning what FL is all about, certainly cuts above Daniel McNeill and Paul Freiberger's Fuzzy Logic (p. 45). -- Copyright ©1993, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.

Dans ce livre (les détails)
First Sentence
Hold an apple in your hand. Lire la première page
En découvrir plus
Concordance
Parcourir les pages échantillon
Plat recto | Droit d'auteur | Table des matières | Extrait | Index | Plat verso
Cherchez à l'intérieur de ce livre:

Associer des mots-clés à ce produit

 (De quoi s'agit-il ?)
Considérez votre mot-clé comme une sorte d'étiquette définissant parfaitement ce produit.
Les mots-clés aident les clients à organiser et trouver leurs articles favoris.
Vos mots-clés : Ajouter votre premier mot-clé
 

 

L'avis des consommateurs

38 évaluations
5 étoiles:
 (6)
4 étoiles:
 (11)
3 étoiles:
 (4)
2 étoiles:
 (3)
1 étoiles:
 (14)
 
 
 
 
 
Évaluation du client type
2.8étoiles sur 5 (38 évaluations de client)
 
 
 
 
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients:
Commentaires client les plus utiles

 
1.0étoiles sur 5 Buddha lite, Jui 4 2004
Par wiredweird "wiredweird" (Earth, or somewhere nearby) - Voir tous mes commentaires
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)   
Buddhist math? C'mon.

First, let me say that fuzzy logic and fuzzy arithmetic are great tools. They're valued parts of the 'soft logic' kit that includes probability, interval arithmetic, Bayesian and Markov networks, and lots of other good stuff. Fuzziness involves many of the formal techniques used in probability and elsewhere, and gives a useful, alternative view of the systems it addresses.

The basic fuzzy idea is that most descriptions involve shades gray, that few systems really match the black/white, on/off, either/or duality of standard formal logic. That's fine, I can get along with that quite well.

My basic problem, though, is that Kosko presents the fuzzy world-view vs. the traditional or "scientific" in exactly those black and white terms. He also argues that fuzziness describes the world more effectively than "scientific" terms, that the rules of arithmetic, probability, and calculus are just games. They are played for their internal consistency, not because differentiation or factorials occur in nature.

That's true, and as a heavy math user I know enough to distinguish my models from reality. Two facts remain, though. First, the models very often do describe reality in ways that can be checked easily enough: the bridge doesn't fall down and the TV receives its signal. Both happen because the bad old exact arithmetic has some kind of correspondence (no, I don't know what) to the real world, giving real ability to predict real results. Second, fuzzy logic and fuzzy arithmetic are themselves mathematical formalisms. Once you get past the gee-whiz stage, there is mathematical content as rigorous as in any other field of study. It's not either/or, it's very often a different way to interpret the same self-consistent games people have played for years. It adds interesting rules to the game.

The great thing is that you really can use the new interpretations and tools along with the old ones. Fuzziness doesn't demolish the old structures, it bolsters them and adds capacity.

And you can get all these benefits without shrink-wrapped, bite-sized pieces of Eastern philosophy.

Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles  
Ce commentaire vous a-t-il été utile ? Oui Non


 
3.0étoiles sur 5 Too much Bart, not enough Fuzzy Thinking, Janv. 6 2004
Par E. Husman "ehusman" (Las Cruces, NM USA) - Voir tous mes commentaires
(REAL NAME)   
Kosko describes the emerging frontier science of "fuzzy logic", making the argument that by simplifying machine operation and making it more like human thinking, this technology will allow very powerful machines to greatly enhance human life. Though sometimes overwhelmed by his fascination with himself (you have to see Mark Leyner's _Et Tu, Babe_ for a similar character), and sometimes overtaken with such bizarre fantasies as cryogenics (the hope for immortality by freezing your body so that someday, someone will be able to revive you), this book provides not only a useful description of fuzziness for the lay person, but some further context for the Aristotle vs. Tao debate opened in _Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance_. I think someone less fascinated by their own experiences could produce a better book; not once, for example, does someone like Richard Epstein have to tell us that he is exceptionally intelligent in order for us to understand that he is.
Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles  
Ce commentaire vous a-t-il été utile ? Oui Non


 
1.0étoiles sur 5 A reader, Sep 20 2003
Par Un client
I bought this book when i was first being introduced to the fuzzy logic world, and i must say i get very disapointed of this.
Fist off, the author spend most time criticizing everything with occidental flavor, from religion to philosophy and i should say that i found this very upseting and distracting.

About the explanations on the subject of fuzzy logic, the author uses some very abstract examples, they are good but not so ilustrative for someone who is just begining in this world and hopes to find clear examples. I give one or two stars for this item.

Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles  
Ce commentaire vous a-t-il été utile ? Oui Non

Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients: Créer votre propre commentaire
 
 
Commentaires client les plus récents

4.0étoiles sur 5 Enlightened me regarding the nature of probability
As a kid thinking about Probability I was very uneasy, intrigued and befuddled by its nature and was never satisfied by any explanations I could find in any book. Lisez davantage
Publié le Janv. 8 2003 par Anthony Chua

5.0étoiles sur 5 Very clear and simple
This book won't win any medals as a textbook, but Bart Kosko clearly did not intend for it to do so. Lisez davantage
Publié le Déc 17 2002 par C. Jaye

4.0étoiles sur 5 fuzzy vs concrete
Before going out on my own, I worked in an office where the music was always too loud or too soft. The problem was the volume control mechanism embedded in the wall. Lisez davantage
Publié le Mai 24 2002 par Justice Litle

2.0étoiles sur 5 A disappointing and superficial look at fuzzy logic
This book is a big disappointment and anyone with any relatively-high level of understanding in physics and math will find the lack of rigour and the authors "obvious"... Lisez davantage
Publié le Avril 2 2002 par Thomas Maydon

1.0étoiles sur 5 Don't bother
I bought this expecting some informative reading. I finished it, not having fulfilled my hopes. The author spends his time discussing philosophy & religion, insulting... Lisez davantage
Publié le Fév 9 2002 par J. Andrew Howe

1.0étoiles sur 5 Fuzzy Thinking- A complete waste of time!!
This is one of the worst books I have ever read! Reading this book was, at best, a complete waste of my time, and at worst, a very frustrating and painful experience. Lisez davantage
Publié le Janv. 31 2002 par scott mathews

3.0étoiles sur 5 Is it Really a New Science?
Regardless of how you answer the question of whether this is a new science or not, this book should be read if you are interested in:
· gaining some insight into how artificial... Lisez davantage
Publié le Déc 10 2001 par Mark S. Hubbard

5.0étoiles sur 5 Entertainment or education? Expectation setting is key.
I've never met Bart Kosko, but reading his book I feel as if I may have. It has a very freely associative (almost conversational) style that leads me to think Kosko lecture... Lisez davantage
Publié le Nov. 1 2001 par jfranta@bigfoot.com

1.0étoiles sur 5 This book - 96% bad!
You will like this book if you like reading about :

How the West is so stupid and rigid in its definitions. Lisez davantage

Publié le Oct. 11 2001

1.0étoiles sur 5 The title is apropos
I was looking forward to a good popularization of Fuzzy Logic theory, but I am quite disappointed.

This is not a science book, nor is it a popularization of science. Lisez davantage

Publié le Oct. 3 2001 par James Daniel

Rechercher uniquement sur les commentaires portant sur ce produit



Listmania!


Cherchez des articles semblables par catégorie


Chercher des articles semblables par sujet


Commentaires

Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?

Votre historique récent

 (En savoir plus)

Après avoir visualisé des pages détaillées produit ou des résultats de recherche, regardez ici pour trouver une façon simple de poursuivre votre navigation sur des pages qui vous intéressent.