- Turtleback: 518 pages
- Publisher: Demco Media (October 1992)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0606007431
- ISBN-13: 978-0606007436
- Product Dimensions: 3.2 x 10.8 x 17.8 cm
- Shipping Weight: 318 g
- Average Customer Review: (60 customer reviews)
|Amazon Price||New from||Used from|
|Turtleback, Oct 1992||
I cannot understand the people who are putting down this third book in the Rama series.
I found it to be a great read. Read more
I guess I am the exception to the rule, as I absolutely loved all 4 of the Rama books. I was so caught up in what had happened and would happen with Nicole and her family that I... Read morePublished on March 19 2004 by Jeffery Hunn
Ever so gently this series is starting to drift. GET BACK ON FOCUS!!! Much of the writing was about mundane people doing mundane things, petty conflicts, a lot of wondering and... Read morePublished on Oct. 21 2003 by Avid Reader
What a let-down!!!
This is an unbelivably poor, hashed-together, novel with a few points of interest (hence 2 stars, instead of 1) but mostly pathetic and unbelivable. Read more
With only one or two exceptions, everybody seems to agree that this follow-up series is the biggest waste of time of our lives! Read morePublished on July 23 2003 by Richard Harris
If Rama II disappointed, avoid this one. The entire plot line is silly (as Nicole and Co. go back and forth between star systems, mostly asleep but aging) and at the end the reader... Read morePublished on Aug. 22 2002 by Barry E. Boothman
In this, the 2nd sequel to the fine SF novel, "Rendevous with Rama," our herione, Nicole (from "Rama II") flys around the Milky Way having babies, then she leaves her oldest (14... Read morePublished on Aug. 15 2002 by "bluejay54"
I read this book several years ago and am now getting ready to read it's precursors. I must admit I'm a bit biased being a fan of Arthur C. Read morePublished on July 18 2002 by Chad Biggerstaff
Tedious, boring, endless. This book goes over and over the same agonizing territory, and it can do that easily because it is impossibly long. Read morePublished on April 29 2002