Most helpful customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
"Those were the times when I carried you", July 3 2009
Set in contemporary London this novel is essentially about deceit and betrayal and the sly manipulations of one disaffected man, determined to exact revenge on his flat mate and best friend, a kind of handsome lothario with an early twenties naivety. Although none of the characters in Glover's Mistake are particularly likeable, the novel has a compelling acerbic and cynical quality, where an ill-fated romance between a young man and an older woman is set against the trend setting art world. The tale begins and ends with obsession. David Pinner is absolutely in thrall to his ex-art teacher, glamorous and beautiful forty-five year old Ruth Marks. Ruth is poised to set the UK art world on fire with her contemporary retrospective here in London - abstract works a sheet of black papyrus four or five meters wide, reflecting her pseudo lesbian/feminist themes. When David reconnects with her at a gallery opening he feels a gut wrenching attraction, the conversation leaving him charged and affected, her seductive aura leaving him feeling drunk and a little engulfed. A writer and a teacher of English literature, who normally spends his evenings alone, blogging on the Internet, chatting on a forum, and managing his webzine, The Damp Review, his meeting with Ruth plunges him into the real of the urban cultural participant, "engaged in the world, aboard in the dark." Ruth - obviously acclimatized to prosperity at an early age - eats up the attention, at first all too willing to take up David's offer of doing some kind of art project together set in urban settings. But even as Ruth begins the cold shivers of hesitation and David settles into an uncomfortable passivity, Ruth is drawn to James Glover, David's hunky, flat mate and the barman, at David's local pub. Even in his early 20's Glover has an undeniable elegance and sex appeal, his physique nothing but tendon and muscle. His easy comicality framed around his apparent naivety. He might share the same flat with David and enjoy the spurts of their jocular and easygoing friendship, but the fiercely intellectual James lives in an entirely different universe. Ironically it is Glover who makes David feel masculine, pumping up his frail manly ego, this once ugly duckling who feels he has grown into "a penguin, a dodo and a booby." Laird's acerbic and caustic novel is framed around the cynical maneuverings of these three personalities with their little hierarchy of ids and egos and superegos. At first all of them hitting it off An edge of banter, David and Glover becoming her wayward boys, cocky mocking and sly, all three sharing intimate trips to the theatre, art house cinema, gallery exhibitions and dinners. It doesn't take long, however for James to develop an irritating sense of being overlooked when Ruth starts showering attentions on Glover. Soon to become a negligible thing. an invisible man, James he feels them both pulling away from his texts and messages, seldom eliciting replies, their affair only a hint of the passion, the marital promises, and the ultimate betrayal to come. As James sets about clandestinely sabotaging the fledging relationship, Nick Laird's London is laid out like a postcard, like its own advertisement: the Millennium Wheel, Big Ben, Tower bridge, the pyramid top of Canary Warf. As this story unfurls just like Ruth's art installations, the reader is left appalled at Andrew, Ruth's and Glover's stunning self-involvement and rapacious shallowness and the fragments of the relationship, the particles and fibers of which are eventually driven and dispersed by David. Poor David is certainly at a loss among these people, mostly characterized by the pretentious Ruth, with their casual manners and ironic patter, their insinuation that surface is depth and that appearance is content. In the end, these are "people who pick other people up and examine them and set them down and laugh." Laird's novel is as dense, rich and as detailed as David's over-worked mind and his skewered sense of devotion. The banality of love and the power of hate along with what passes for love in a threesome gone horribly wrong is the at core of Glover's Mistake where everyone you meet is wearing some disguise and where "the lover is the best liar of the lot." Mike Leonard July 09.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
a yawn that nearly broke my jaw, Aug 15 2009
By M. Fulkerson - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Glover's Mistake (Hardcover)
Pre-release customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Program
This book was really difficult to finish. Not because it was offensive, or shocking, or I thought that the author didn't have any abilities. It's that the book was so boring in its retreading of so many other stories before it. It reminded me of the show Friends with some cocaine and sex scenes thrown in. Laird tries to shake up what is otherwise an tired old love-triangle tale by attempting to be cutting edge with some vulgarities, but it just ends up being a cliched mess. Every character in the book reeks of pretentious platitudes, and they all send off an air of privileged "me me me" attitudes. This could be fine if Laird would have balanced this with some irony or some distractions that showed these characters for the inept whiners they are, but he never does. They just perpetually spin into a self-serving vortex that makes you want to scream (or close the book forever!) While I was reading this story it made me think of many other, and better, books about relationships I've read in the past, and by the end of Glover's Mistake I could only think that I was the one who made the mistake of reading this book!
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Witty, at times, but insuffciently so, July 18 2009
By Dave "Dave" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Glover's Mistake (Hardcover)
Pre-release customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Program
While this book is set, ever so superficially, in the London art scene, it has virtually nothing to do with either London or any art scene. Yes, there are a couple of openings, and yes, there are a few lines of coke, but it's all irrelevant to the story - these people could have been working at a laundry in Des Moines for all it mattered. It starts out slowly, as the protagonist (David) seems dreary from the first, and nothing changes that. While his internal dialog is occasionally witty, it's at strange odds with his conversation, which is puerile, and often embarassing to the reader. We're supposed to see this as a love triangle, in which David's unreturned infatuation with the artist Ruth is derailed when she becomes involved with David's flatmate Glover. David broods, whines, and eventually manipulates a destruction of Ruth and Glover's relationship. This might seem sad, except that one doesn't really care what happens to the relationship: Ruth is unsympathetic, and Glover always seems in way over his head. Glover's mistake, which ends his relationship with Ruth, seems inconsistent with his character and ends the novel on a false note that reflects a lack of imagination on the writer's part. Miss this.
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars
Controversy Becomes Cliche, Jun 22 2009
By Book Dork - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Glover's Mistake (Hardcover)
Pre-release customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Program
Glover's Mistake is about the love triangle between lonely, single David, his young roommate Glover, and Ruth, an eccentric, middle-aged artist. A Few Positives - Ruth's daughter Bridget is probably the most dynamic, interesting character in the novel. Sassy, rebellious and intelligent she enjoys pointing out her mother's hypocrisies. - David's bitter sarcasm can be entertaining. The Negatives - Controversy becomes cliche; blogging, snorting coke, older women dating younger men, religion, and modern art. Laird is trying too hard to connect with this generation. He instead should have picked one or two and really developed the issues. - The scheming that occurs in the second half of the novel is contrived and an obviously desperate attempt to add excitement to the plot. - The three main characters aren't interesting or well-developed. - Laird is trying to monopolize on the whole "cougar" trend currently occurring. This would be fine if he was being innovative about it- he is not. The relationship follows the exact trend you would expect. Unfortunately, I was very disappointed with this novel and would not recommend it.
|
|
|