Grand Theories and Everyday Beliefs and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more

Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Grand Theories and Everyday Beliefs on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Grand Theories and Everyday Beliefs: Science, Philosophy, and their Histories [Hardcover]

Wallace Matson
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
List Price: CDN$ 38.50
Price: CDN$ 29.40 & FREE Shipping. Details
You Save: CDN$ 9.10 (24%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca. Gift-wrap available.
Want it delivered Wednesday, July 30? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition CDN $14.27  
Hardcover CDN $29.40  
Join Amazon Student in Canada


Book Description

Nov. 16 2011
After a Darwinian-type account of what beliefs are and how they arose in animals acting to cope with their environments -"low beliefs," virtually all of which are true - Wallace Matson here shows how the invention of language led to imagination and thence to beliefs formed in other ways ("high beliefs"), not true though thought to be, which could be consolidated into mythologies, the first Grand Unified Theories of Everything. Science began when Thales of Miletus produced a Grand Theory based on low ("everyday") beliefs. Matson traces the course of science and philosophy through seven centuries to their sudden and violent displacement by Christianity with its Grand Theory of the old type. Against the widespread opinion that modern philosophy has slowly but completely emancipated itself from bondage to theology, he shows how remnants from the medieval 'interlude' still lurk unnoticed in the purportedly neutral notions of logical possibility, possible worlds, and laws as commands, to the detriment of the natural harmony between science and philosophy, including ethics. Accessibly written, this is a book for all who are interested in the foundations of 21st century thought and who wonder where the cracks might be.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details


Product Description

Review


"While utilizing the insights and criticisms of philosophers and scientists before him, the book avoids the literary downfalls of its predecessors; it is succinct, approachable, and immensely enjoyable to read. Each chapter offers up a distinct focus and resolves in a clarifying abstract. The topics addressed inevitably set the book as a spark for debate between scholars and laymen alike, but it serves also as tangible proof of the low belief that philosophy matters every day."--Publishers Weekly


"This remarkable work by Matson can be read on the surface as an engaging journey through intellectual history, rich in details drawn from the author's encyclopedic knowledge of the history of philosophy...For general readers this is an accessible, intriguing history of philosophy. It will appeal to all who seek to understand the ongoing tension between religious belief and scientific theory. Highly recommended."--CHOICE


About the Author

Wallace Matson is Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley. He is the co-author of A New History of Philosophy, Vol. I and II.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
5.0 out of 5 stars
5.0 out of 5 stars
Most helpful customer reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars A great last work Oct. 27 2013
By CGP TOP 1000 REVIEWER
Format:Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
Grand Theories and Everyday Beliefs: Science, Philosophy, and their HistoriesWallace Matson was the best professor and later friend that I ever had and this book, his last one before his death, is the best overview of philosophy I've ever read. It is well beyond the usual factional efforts and is addressed to everyone who aspires to productive abstract thought. In his light and engaging style Matson goes back to square one to sketch the importance and role of beliefs in our way of thinking. I'm recommending this to everyone, with or without a philosophy background. This book is not only the culmination of an inspiring career in philosophy, it is a marvelous read that pulls together so much that we too often forget or ignore. Just read the Intro and you'll want to read the book. A grand last word.

CGP
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.8 out of 5 stars  4 reviews
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Email message to the author two months before he died June 26 2013
By Stephen Kern - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
I wrote this email message about "Grand Theories and Everyday Beliefs" to the author, Professor Wallace Matson, shortly after the book was published, and two months before he died in 2012 at age 91.

Dear Professor Matson,

I read "Grand Theories and Everyday Beliefs" a few weeks ago. My immediate impulse was to write to you about the many things you wrote that I agree with, and the things I had inklings about which you reinforced. But most of my ideas and inklings likely arose from reading about high and low beliefs in the Second Edition of your text books or your "Uncorrected Papers". And you already know these things. So, I'm not sure there is a lot to be gained by going on about how enlightening they are as I have done in the past. But, now, after reading your book again, there are a few things I would like to say about it.

Will Durant wrote that we have become a world of specialists, knowing more and more about less and less. Unfortunately, it seems to me this is so even for many philosophers. You are an exception to that. You have offered an edifying account of the biggest picture of where we are and how we got here. If Hume awakened Kant from his dogmatic slumbers, hopefully you will do the same for many present day philosophers. You make it clear that brilliant men have wasted valuable time in philosophical cul-de-sacs. I admire your ability to see things clearly and your willingness to tell it like it is.

While most religious beliefs are products of wishful thinking, and are intended to help people maintain hope and overcome fear, when beliefs are in conflict with knowledge they begin to lose their value. And when they collide with the beliefs of others, they threaten our peaceful coexistence. If their purpose is to raise hopes and to diminish fears, it is at least ironic that, in the near term, conflicts in religious belief now stand as the most likely cause of our voluntary extinction. As you note, this danger has arisen because our intelligence has evolved more rapidly than our hunter/gatherer emotions have evolved. So, as a species, we are now in the precarious state of a powerful intellectual genius, but, at the same time, a dangerous emotional adolescent.

My hope is that your book will be widely recognized for what it is - a comprehensive, thoughtful description of the development of a common, yet significant, feature of human life, and an explanation of why, despite its flaws and dangers, it persists. If your concepts of "high belief" and "low belief" and their implications become widely understood, it could go a long way toward defusing the threat imposed on the world by religious belief. Hopefully, others will adopt these concepts, and will build on the foundation that you have so beautifully put in place.

Just as you did in the first sentence of the introduction to your philosophy text, George Santayana made an important point in the first sentence of his introduction to "Three Philosophical Poets" (one of whom, as you likely know, was our friend Lucretius): "The sole advantage of possessing great works of literature lies in what they can help us to become." In his keen insight, Santayana moved one step beyond the value of 'knowledge' itself, to the impact it has on what we 'are'. Your book has the potential to do that. It can cause us to become something better than what we are now.

Thank you, Professor Matson, for sharing with all of us your valuable thoughts. And thanks to everyone from your students at Berkeley to your friends at Yale who helped make it possible.

With fondest personal regards,
Steve Kern

Brief response from Professor Matson:
Dear Steve,
Thank you again for your beautiful letter. That makes it so worth while.
Bonus quote from Quine: "To learn is to learn to have fun."
Thanks again,
Wallace
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars grand book and everyday readers Jan. 4 2013
By parmenides - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
I really enjoyed this well thought, informative book. In a sense, it is a history of western philosophy + the intellectual evolution that took place in prehistoric times. That is, in contrast to other histories of western philosophy, it includes a few chapters for intellectual aspects that all human societies shared before their fragmentation into great civilizations.
Low and high beliefs is a nice tool for explaining what unites (low beliefs) and what divides (high beliefs) humanity, and how
the invention of philosophy and science in ancient Greece has the potential of transforming all high beliefs into low and unify all human societies. It explains why this has not happened (i.e. how the classical Greek intellectual tradition gave space to Christianity and religious thinking in general) in a reliable way. Of interest is also the analysis of the recovery of the West from the loss of the Milesian outlook and current efforts towards a new non-religious ethics. In this respect, I found the authors critique of Descartes and Leibniz quite on the spot. The book is mainly about ethics and offers an impressive effort for the reestablishment of the Classical ideal (Aristotle's ethics for example) for a secular, rational and in the end scientific ethics (via evolutionary game dynamics for example) that is connected with the state and not with religion. Such ethics could bind humanity together so I could not recommend stronger this book to young people, and in fact parts of the book could be ideal for even secondary education (let alone university level).

Some minor problems:

(1) It is too short for what is trying to achieve. That is why the discussions in some places are a bit wanting of more data and analysis.

(2) The most important chapter that of Athens classes with Jerusalem is a bit shallow. Yes, the main aspects of religion are presented but not nicely discussed in depth. That is, yes indeed, their characteristics are presented but WHY they came to be like that? A bit more information on the social environment and the reasons for the resulting medieval stagnation of the west were definitely lacking. For example, is it possible that signs of this environment are present today? What are the chances of the same thing happening again and so on. In this context, I also found that the novelty of the christian synthesis of jewish/middle-east and hellenic/pagan elements into something qualitatively new (not altogether conceptually self-consistent but fully serving the interests of the crumbling roman power that shaped it) could have been discussed in greater extension.

Some even more minor things: I would identify Parmenidean unchanged Being with a logicomathematical one rather than space, and I would place Plato's republic squarely and undoubtedly at the top of single philosophical achievements.

Moreover, Plato is not hostile to science as the author says. I believe he reaches this wrong conclusion because he underestimates (in comparison with the three Milesian scientific axioms) the role of dialectic in science. It is more important than the three Milesian characteristics and indeed generations of scientists learned how to argue reading the grand master (Plato). Moreover, the element of (constrained) imagination is the very essence of scientific theorising and one can (and should) enjoy the highly imaginative Platonic thought (even if immediately recognises many of his theories as wrong). So sure, Plato was not a scientist like Thales, Democritus or Aristotle but his thought was not hostile to science.

Finally, it is the case that philosophy can survive in academia only as fundamental science; i.e. as a deep scientific analysis of the grand questions of science (and not as sophisticated journalism which is the other tendency). There is certainly space for this type of philosophy in a modern society. The author's point of view is supporting such an idea for the role of philosophy by showing that philosophy was a science in the beginning and whenever (throughout the centuries) was other than that it became weak and decayed into a sophisticated shadow of religion. Perhaps unexpectedly, the paradigm for modern philosophy (and indeed for the recovery of the west for its current decline and rapid decay of values) is not classical philosophy but the presocratic one. Similarly, the most benevolent democracy model is the one of Solon and not of Pericles.
Presocratic philosophy offers the tools for the theoretical understanding of Solon's democracy. It argues for the harmony between nature and society by extended natural Dike to political Justice [an excellent modern source is: "The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics" by D. Graham (CUP)]. It is not too late for philosophy and indeed for the west for such a much needed rebirth.

If you have any interest in the human condition and actively seek to promote what unites us and avoid what divides us, do not miss this little gem!
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars An excellent book March 22 2014
By Mohammed Alarabi - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
If you are a science enthusiast, and you are bothered by how philosophy (although necessary to talk about science) seems like a waste of time in our modern day, this book will provide you with a "satisfying" philosophical view which relies on facts. This view starts by "demarcating" between what's true and what's false, and explains why humans may be the only species with false beliefs. From there, the author guides you through human history to how science was given birth in ancient Miletus, and how philosophy and science were supportive of each other to most Greek philosophers. Until certain "high beliefs" (what the author calls beliefs without connection to reality) started pushing people away from the monist, naturalistic, and rational tendency of Milesian science. This redirection of thought affected philosophy for a very long time, and even explains the motives of Cartesian skepticism. The book uses all these "facts" to provide insights into institutions and how they come about, morality and how it is born, and the future of humans. Most notably, the book states a strong point against Hume's problem of induction, which, to my knowledge, is one of the strongest. All in all, this book is a philosophical master-piece, and the manifestation of hope for us scientists and science enthusiasts in modern philosophy.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Grand Theories and Everyday Beliefs Aug. 31 2013
By Steve Benner - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
Grand Theories and Everyday Beliefs is an excellent work by the greatest philosopher of the 20th and early 21st centuries, Wallace Matson, distinguished leader of UC Berkeley's Philosophy department for 40 years. A superb writer and thinker, Prof. Matson will fire your interest with his clear logic and flowing insight into how things work in this world.
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!!!
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Look for similar items by category


Feedback