Guerillas and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Guerrillas Hardcover – Jul 1997


See all 10 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Hardcover, Jul 1997

Best Canadian Books of 2014
Margaret Atwood's stunning new collection of stories, Stone Mattress, is our #1 Canadian pick for 2014. See all
--This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Join Amazon Student in Canada



Product Details

  • Hardcover
  • Publisher: Peter Smith Pub Inc (July 1997)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0844669105
  • ISBN-13: 978-0844669106
  • Product Dimensions: 1.9 x 12.7 x 21 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 295 g
  • Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (16 customer reviews)

Product Description

Review

“A Tolstoyan spirit.... The so-called Third World has produced no more brilliant literary artist.” — John Updike

“Naipaul is a master of English prose.” — J. M. Coetzee, New York Review of Books

“V. S. Naipaul has a substantial claim as a comic writer.... This humor, conducted throughout with the utmost stylistic quietude, is completely original.” — Kingsley Amis, The Spectator

“Mr. Naipaul travels with the artist’s eye and ear and his observations are sharply discerning.” — Evelyn Waugh

“For sheer abundance of talent there can hardly be a writer alive who surpasses V. S. Naipaul. [He is] the world’s writer, a master of language and perception.” — The New York Times Book Review --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

From the Back Cover

“A Tolstoyan spirit.... The so-called Third World has produced no more brilliant literary artist.” — John Updike

“Naipaul is a master of English prose.” — J. M. Coetzee, New York Review of Books

“V. S. Naipaul has a substantial claim as a comic writer.... This humor, conducted throughout with the utmost stylistic quietude, is completely original.” — Kingsley Amis, The Spectator

“Mr. Naipaul travels with the artist’s eye and ear and his observations are sharply discerning.” — Evelyn Waugh

“For sheer abundance of talent there can hardly be a writer alive who surpasses V. S. Naipaul. [He is] the world’s writer, a master of language and perception.” — The New York Times Book Review --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Customer Reviews

3.5 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

Format: Paperback
I came back to this novel after giving up on it after the first chapter a few years ago. I have read Naipaul's non-fiction account of the Michael X murders in Trinidad in his "The Killings in Trinidad." The book fictionalizes the story of murders committed at a black-power commune led by Michael X, a former pimp and accused rapist who returned to his native Trinidad in the early 1970's after living in England for many years.
The novel is very dark and grim with a sense of doom and gloom permeating the lives of all the characters. There is not one likable character. Naipaul takes pains to imply that the book is not set in Trinidad even though the actual events did occur there. This Trinidad is very different from the folksy Dickensian Trinidad of A House for Mr. Biswas and The Mystic Masseur. The Trinidad he describes in this book is a dreadful place ready to explode with civil war and racial violence. The wealthy and mostly white live in fear in exclusive enclaves in mortal fear of their own servants. The underclass blacks live in slums seething with barely suppressed violence.
The atmosphere of fear is well described but it unfortunately does not make this an enjoyable book. There were several stylistics touches that I found especially irritating. A very representative example is at the very end of the book. Jimmy Ahmed is the Michael X character. Near the end of the book there is a sex scene between Jimmy and Jane, the visiting British hipster. This sex scene becomes a rape scene. Just before Jimmy sodomizes Jane, ... he forcefully kisses her, forcing her mouth open and spitting into her mouth while repeatedly saying, "love, love." I can only interpret this as an inability on Naipaul's part to write sex scenes.
Scenes such as this leave the reader with a bad taste in his mouth. Avoid unless you feel you must read every word the great man has written.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Format: Paperback
Those who have read Naipaul's relatively more famous 'A Bend in the River', should remember that when Indar the professor took his childhood friend Salim to a party at historian Raymond's house Joan Baize's excellent songs on injustice and 'end of the world'(from nuclear threat) were being played. Salim knew for sure that those were make believe. He felt that only those who got justice most of the times and are expecting to get it as before could sing such sweet songs on injustice. Those who knew that the world would go on and they were safe in it were likely to sing such songs on the end of the world. Naipaul never believed in a hasty, romantic and adventurous way of improvemrnt that has been the vision of revolution among the guerrillas. His mantra has been continuous self-assessment. That is why Peter and not Jimmy Ahmed, is the hero in a novel with such an explosive title. Jimmy's diary that he writes time to time in the form of a letter clearly betrays his self- congratulatory narcissism only which, sadly enough, sustains him as a guerrilla. Then Meredith plays the game at the lawn of De Tunja. He asks De Tunja to describe an ideal day for himself but through a piece of paper written beforehand, shows Peter's adventure loving wife that men can not really think of much change at a time, as Tunja describes more or less an usual day. The woman is enraged. The story ends in total breakdown of faith and credibility among the revolutionaries. Naipaul's strength is in the balance of treatment that neither makes villains out of the revolutionaries nor does it ridicule them. This is a kind of novel which is not for the reader with passing interest in politics.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
By Joseph on Feb. 11 2002
Format: Paperback
Analyses of V.S. Naipaul's Guerillas
V.S. Naipaul's novel, Guerillas tells the story of Peter Roche, a South African resistance fighter, his mistress Jane, and a revolutionary leader Jimmy Ahmed. The book unfolds on a former British colony in the Caribbean during the 1970's. This Island is inhabited with Asians, Africans, Americans and former British colonials. Racial and economic tensions are ever present and the islanders are said to "coexist in hysteria." Peter Roche has made his way to the island to "work," while his mistress, Jane, has come along to join Peter for her own reasons. From Jane's point of view, initially, Peter was a doer and had a cause. He was saint-like and gentle. However as the novel progressed, she began to see Peter in a different light. Furthermore, from his own perspective, Peter was a failure, and inadequate in the eyes of Jane, who he grew to seek approval from. It was Jane's ultimate rejection of Peter via her sexual indecencies that enabled Peter, in an attempt to salvage his pride, to overlook the forced sodemy and murder of his wife by Jimmy Ahmed.
Peter Roche was a South African freedom fighter. Though he was white, he readily fought for the black man and even risked his life for apartheid. He authored a book about his experiences in South Africa. He was tortured by the South African government and was asked to recount his memoirs in a book. It was under these pretences that he had met his mistress Jane. She was in the publishing business and used his book as an excuse to get to know him. Jane was portrayed as a character that lived through her men. She seemed incomplete without a man. Further, it seemed as if she was searching for a rich, powerful, handsome man that could finance her life and make her a complete person.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

Most recent customer reviews


Look for similar items by category


Feedback