CDN$ 100.00
  • List Price: CDN$ 125.00
  • You Save: CDN$ 25.00 (20%)
Usually ships within 3 to 5 weeks.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.ca.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria Hardcover – Aug 31 2009


See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
CDN$ 100.00
CDN$ 93.50 CDN$ 96.84

2014 Books Gift Guide
Yes Please is featured in our 2014 Books Gift Guide. More gift ideas

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Join Amazon Student in Canada


Frequently Bought Together

Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria + Guidelines for Evaluating Process Plant Buildings for External Explosions, Fires, and Toxic Releases
Price For Both: CDN$ 210.40


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought



Product Details


Product Description

About the Author

Since 1985, the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) has been the world leader in developing and disseminating information on process safety management and technology. CCPS, an industry technology alliance of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), has published over 80 books in its process safety guidelines and process safety concepts series, and over 100 training modules through its Safety in Chemical Engineering Education (SACHE) series.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.ca
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 1 review
Used a basic reference Aug. 15 2013
By Richard Zimmerman - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Useful item for the safety library for those that need some pointers on developing or judging the adequacy of their effort.


Feedback