14 of 15 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars
A dispassionate examination of Haiti grounded in its history, Jan 16 2012
By N. C. Jewell - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Haiti: The Aftershocks of History (Hardcover)
Having lived and worked in Haiti over a period of 40 years I approach any book and article about the country with great apprehension. So much of what is written is simplistic and judgmental, buying into one or another side of deeply polarizing issues, events, and personalities. This book beautifully conveys Haiti's complexity and puts it in historical context. For non Haitians who love Haiti as I do or for those who want to understand what lies beneath the country they know about only through the media, this is an excellent source of information. Thank you Laurent Dubois.
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars
INDISPENSABLE BOOK ON HAITIAN HISTORY BUT A BIT TOO SLANTED, Jan 22 2012
By JR Pinto - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Haiti: The Aftershocks of History (Hardcover)
I love Haiti and I am fascinated by its history. This book fills a much-needed gap - the history of Haiti from the revolution to the present. Presented here is a detailed and highly-readable account of events that many people may have heard about but never really read in detail. For example, many people know of the Duvalier regime, but much less famous are the leaders who came before them - knowing only that the government was "unstable." Dubois also makes a convincing argument against the US occupation - showing it as a time of humiliation and tyranny.
On the negative side however, this book is anything but impartial. Dubois clearly loves Haiti so he engages in sometimes unconvincing mental gymnastics to defend Haiti and blame all its troubles on outsiders - usually the US. The review in the New York times put it best: "Seldom, however, can outsiders be blamed for all a country's troubles". For example, Dubois is perfectly happy to quote Faustin Wirkus when he is critical of the US, but disbelieves his story that the inhabitants of Ile de la Gonave made him king.
I also take exception to his depiction of NGOs after the quake - about that, he is just plain wrong. I've been to Port-au-Prince with one of those organizations and they - along with the US military and UN peacekeeping forces - are doing indispensable work down there. If Dubois sees them as yet another infringement of Haitian sovereignty than I and the Haitians I have met (in direct contradiction to his book) must disagree. If there were no NGOs in Haiti (including Sean Penn and his organization) than the effects of the earthquake would be incalculably worse. The unintentional conclusion that Dubois seems to be asking his readers to draw is that no one should interfere with Haiti in any way - don't go there, don't send money, don't do anything. I know he doesn't want that, and if that were to occur, then thousands more would be dying of hunger, disease, exposure, and violence.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Worthwhile Overview, But Lacking in Spots, Mar 4 2012
By KSF - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Haiti: The Aftershocks of History (Hardcover)
This book offers a solid overview of Haitian history from its inception to the present, and is a good starting place for any reader with an interest in but not much knowledge of Haitian history (like me). It is a long book but reads quickly and guides the reader among the many characters, periods, uprisings, and tragedies that have marked Haitian history. It also upends many common stereotypes held by Americans about Haitians and Haitian history. But while it is strong at explaining the 'what' of the story, it's much weaker at explaining the 'why.' Many major points seem to be assumed without sufficient explanation, and major happenings are described without providing the reader with a clear sense of the motivations behind them. It's a good book in that it piques the interest for more, but it's not sufficient by itself.