Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

History: Fiction or Science? [Paperback]

Anatoly T. Fomenko
3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (21 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback CDN $26.73  
Paperback, February 2004 --  

Book Description

February 2004
`History: Fiction or Science?` is the most explosive tractate on history and chronology ever written.

This book is not another conspiracy theory - every hypothesis it contains is backed by solid scientific data.

The book is well-illustrated, contains 446 graphs and illustrations, copies of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays.

You will be amazed to discover: - That the chronology universally taken for granted is indeed wrong; - That this chronology was essentially invented in the XVI-XVII century; - That archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts known today are erroneous or non-exact; - That there is not a single document that could be reliably dated earlier than the XIth century; - That Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy; - That Jesus Christ may have been born in 1053 and crucified in 1086 AD; - That the Old Testament is probably a rendition of Middle Ages events; - That the Old Europe is not as ancient as it claims.

Henry Ford once said: "History is more or less bunk". Leading Mathematician Anatoly Fomenko proved it.


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details


Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
"One often comes across accounts of a steel chisel found in the external masonry of the Great Pyramid of Cheops (Khufu, the beginning of XXX century b.c.); however, it is indeed most probable that said tool got there during a later age, when the pyramid stones were pillaged for building purposes." Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Sky&Telescope Magazine confirms results April 28 2004
By A Customer
Format:Paperback
Sky&Telescope Magazine confirms results, but does not buy Fomenko's theory
Fomenko uses astronomy data to support his argument that history is too long and that many historical events happened more recently than we thought. The temple walls and sarcophagi of some Egyptian ruins are decorated with depictions of the sun, moon, and planets as observed in the different zodiacal constellations. If a given depiction is accurate - that the celestial bodies were observed and placed correctly in the constellations - a horoscope can be used for dating. Fomenko has deciphered over a dozen Egyptian horoscopes. He claims, that the latter show dates that are 2-3 thousand of years later than conventionally thought. Most well-documented ancient eclipses actually took place in the Middle Ages.

Roger Sinnott, studied astronomy at Harvard and is an editor at the respected Sky & Telescope Magazine checked Fomenko's calculations for the famous trio of eclipses from Thucydides's account of the Pelopponesian War. The three eclipses are conventionally dated to 431, 424, and 413 BC. Fomenko finds these dates as non adequate to narrative of Thucydides's and finds exact solutions as late as in 1133, 1140, and 1151 AD.

The second example is the eclipse of 190 BC described in Livy's history
of Rome. Fomenko redates this event to 967 AD.

Fomenko`s dates accommodate details from ancient descriptions that the conventional dates do not. For example, Thucydides wrote that the first of his three eclipses was solar and that the stars were visible, that means that the eclipse was total. The accepted solution of August 3, 431 BC involves an eclipse that was only partial in Greece. Similarly, the Livy eclipse is supposed to have happened five days before the ides of July, which by our conventional reckoning would date it July 10. Fomenko's 967 AD solution nails that date, while the conventional 190 BC eclipse actually occurred on March 14.

Sinnott confirms that eclipses did take place on the dates Fomenko has chosen and concludes, "Even though Fomenko has found valid eclipse dates that seem to fit the descriptions, I think it is far-fetched in the extreme to conclude that the chronology of the ancient world is 'off' by more than one thousand years." Free country, isn't it?
Check Fomenko's calculations with ANY sky mapping software, professional or amateur, you'll get his results confirmed.

Was this review helpful to you?
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars dynamite in a paperback Mar 29 2004
Format:Paperback
It should hardly surprise us that historians demonstrate such bloodthirst when it comes to the brilliant Russian mathematician - if enough people begin to question the foundations of world history and find all the tremendous inconsistencies buried there, the historical profession shall cease to exist and make way for the new natural science. If Fomenko isn't eaten alive come that bright day, that is.
Was this review helpful to you?
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A real eye-opener! Mar 18 2004
Format:Paperback
Too bad, but "History: Fiction or Science?" cannot be dismissingly classified neither as special "forgery" for American public nor as conspiracy thriller. It looks and smells as academic research dedicated to facts of long term distortion of history and manipulation of chronology. Fomenko's is a tall order; small wonder he's shot at. A real eye-opener!
Was this review helpful to you?
Want to see more reviews on this item?
Most recent customer reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars Deals with a very serious issue
History: Fiction Or Science? is a quite scholarly expose of the extreme limitations of our understanding of human history. Read more
Published on July 17 2004 by Midwest Book Review
4.0 out of 5 stars I really don't know whether I must laugh or cry.
According to this chronology (which we can name "Ultra High Revised Chronology"), Jesus died in 1086 AD. Read more
Published on April 28 2004 by Dr. Renata Scaffoldini
4.0 out of 5 stars Vicious Circle
The author is gone realy too far, but made, a few quite valid points. For example, the carbon-dating process is calibrated nowadays basis "known dates," i.e. Read more
Published on April 28 2004
5.0 out of 5 stars Fomenko is highly entertaining, if not on target
Fomenko is highly entertaining, if not on target
It should also be possible, as Fomenko states, to study regnal year lengths on a statistical basis. Read more
Published on April 28 2004 by Chris Marlowe
3.0 out of 5 stars one question
Why does it say up top that "Mick Jagger" is the translator? Is this an attempt at gaining a wider audience? (... Read more
Published on April 20 2004
1.0 out of 5 stars hands off science
mathematicians should stick to mathematics and leave history the hell alone, they wouldn't know common sense if it bit them - they might do well to calculate the geometry of their... Read more
Published on Mar 29 2004 by Conrad Henderson
5.0 out of 5 stars Earth is flat
Earth was flat. Humans saw that it was flat, books were telling scholars that it was flat, teachers were teaching students it was flat; scientists knew it was flat. Read more
Published on Mar 27 2004 by Alec
1.0 out of 5 stars a complete abomination
So much as opening this book is an insult to your intelligence already. It is amazing someone published it at all, but I guess they publish anything these days, "Mein Kampf"... Read more
Published on Mar 26 2004 by Ian Bunting
1.0 out of 5 stars Lies, lies, lies
What a disgusting collection of lies. Stuff for ignorant nihilists who think it's cool to doubt everything, including the obvious - for instance, the existence of such famous... Read more
Published on Mar 26 2004 by "chad_parker55"
5.0 out of 5 stars Alternative view
If you can't handle an alternate view of history and how it may have been purposely kept from the general public, don't read this book. Read more
Published on Mar 22 2004 by Cabbalist
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Feedback