Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

History: Fiction or Science? [Paperback]

Anatoly T. Fomenko
3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (21 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback CDN $29.02  
Paperback, February 2004 --  
Save Up to 90% on Textbooks
Hit the books in Amazon.ca's Textbook Store and save up to 90% on used textbooks and 35% on new textbooks. Learn more.
Join Amazon Student in Canada


Book Description

February 2004
`History: Fiction or Science?` is the most explosive tractate on history and chronology ever written.

This book is not another conspiracy theory - every hypothesis it contains is backed by solid scientific data.

The book is well-illustrated, contains 446 graphs and illustrations, copies of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays.

You will be amazed to discover: - That the chronology universally taken for granted is indeed wrong; - That this chronology was essentially invented in the XVI-XVII century; - That archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts known today are erroneous or non-exact; - That there is not a single document that could be reliably dated earlier than the XIth century; - That Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy; - That Jesus Christ may have been born in 1053 and crucified in 1086 AD; - That the Old Testament is probably a rendition of Middle Ages events; - That the Old Europe is not as ancient as it claims.

Henry Ford once said: "History is more or less bunk". Leading Mathematician Anatoly Fomenko proved it.


Product Details


Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
"One often comes across accounts of a steel chisel found in the external masonry of the Great Pyramid of Cheops (Khufu, the beginning of XXX century b.c.); however, it is indeed most probable that said tool got there during a later age, when the pyramid stones were pillaged for building purposes." Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Sky&Telescope Magazine confirms results April 28 2004
By A Customer
Format:Paperback
Sky&Telescope Magazine confirms results, but does not buy Fomenko's theory
Fomenko uses astronomy data to support his argument that history is too long and that many historical events happened more recently than we thought. The temple walls and sarcophagi of some Egyptian ruins are decorated with depictions of the sun, moon, and planets as observed in the different zodiacal constellations. If a given depiction is accurate - that the celestial bodies were observed and placed correctly in the constellations - a horoscope can be used for dating. Fomenko has deciphered over a dozen Egyptian horoscopes. He claims, that the latter show dates that are 2-3 thousand of years later than conventionally thought. Most well-documented ancient eclipses actually took place in the Middle Ages.
Roger Sinnott, studied astronomy at Harvard and is an editor at the respected Sky & Telescope Magazine checked Fomenko's calculations for the famous trio of eclipses from Thucydides's account of the Pelopponesian War. The three eclipses are conventionally dated to 431, 424, and 413 BC. Fomenko finds these dates as non adequate to narrative of Thucydides's and finds exact solutions as late as in 1133, 1140, and 1151 AD.
The second example is the eclipse of 190 BC described in Livy's history
of Rome. Fomenko redates this event to 967 AD.
Fomenko`s dates accommodate details from ancient descriptions that the conventional dates do not. For example, Thucydides wrote that the first of his three eclipses was solar and that the stars were visible, that means that the eclipse was total. The accepted solution of August 3, 431 BC involves an eclipse that was only partial in Greece.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars dynamite in a paperback March 29 2004
Format:Paperback
It should hardly surprise us that historians demonstrate such bloodthirst when it comes to the brilliant Russian mathematician - if enough people begin to question the foundations of world history and find all the tremendous inconsistencies buried there, the historical profession shall cease to exist and make way for the new natural science. If Fomenko isn't eaten alive come that bright day, that is.
Was this review helpful to you?
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Cool Historian Dec 12 2003
Format:Paperback
Dear Diamond Robert of Princeton,
Don`t be rude, just add more venom in your argument. Otherwise no Princeton lecturer of history will give you extra credits for attacking Fomenko the Heretic. For Christ`s sake don`t touch C14, it is both radioactive and contradictory, there too many of +/-1000 anno dating errors. Tell all your friends and relations NEVER talk, read or even think about FOMENKO, it is a real thought crime.
Was this review helpful to you?
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A real eye-opener! March 18 2004
Format:Paperback
Too bad, but "History: Fiction or Science?" cannot be dismissingly classified neither as special "forgery" for American public nor as conspiracy thriller. It looks and smells as academic research dedicated to facts of long term distortion of history and manipulation of chronology. Fomenko's is a tall order; small wonder he's shot at. A real eye-opener!
Was this review helpful to you?
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Deals with a very serious issue July 17 2004
Format:Paperback
History: Fiction Or Science? is a quite scholarly expose of the extreme limitations of our understanding of human history. So few physical records have survived hundreds, let alone thousands of years that it casts even the most conventional understanding of what really happened into doubt. Chapters address the problems of historical chronology in general, astronomical datings, astronomy in the Old Testament, methods of dating ancient events via mathematical statistics, the construction of a global chronological map, the Dark Ages, and much more. Black-and-white illustrations add a vivid touch to this scholarly work that may appear controversial yet deals with a very serious issue directly affecting humanity's comprehension of its own past.
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Alternative view March 22 2004
Format:Paperback
If you can't handle an alternate view of history and how it may have been purposely kept from the general public, don't read this book. It is the best book I've ever read about history.
Was this review helpful to you?
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Earth is flat March 27 2004
By Alec
Format:Paperback
Earth was flat. Humans saw that it was flat, books were telling scholars that it was flat, teachers were teaching students it was flat; scientists knew it was flat. There was some disagreement about the way it was kept afloat, most common versions were elephants, whales and turtles, but that was subject for scientific discussion. Until Magellan sailed around the globe and proved all this science wrong.
This book is precisely about same situation. Although it is written for casual reader, it still bears all the traits of scientific research. I was suspicious about credibility of this book, because of the scandalous 10,000.00 bet placed as advertisement here (you can beat math only by math, and guy who posted the ad knows this).
I've studied math using Fomenko's textbooks as supplementary source at Fraser university (there are around 14 textbooks on math, at least known to me, written by Fomenko and translated to English, pretty expensive and rare as all advanced textbooks, but I'm pretty sure it is possible to fish something at your local university, here is the one for the start - ISBN: 0792326067).
I've run some of the statistical examples in SPSS (of course simplified and using data from the book) and results were similar. Math doesn't lie, but there is old saying "garbage in - garbage out", so take my results as is. Anyway, history as a science is based on books written by previous generation of historians, who based their works on works of previous generation of historians, supplemented by archeological digs (great deal of assumptions was made there too, as people didn't usually mark their belongings with dates), so it definitely needs some mathematical treatment.
It is very difficult to digest the new version of history from Fomenko without getting allergic shock.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
Want to see more reviews on this item?
Most recent customer reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars I really don't know whether I must laugh or cry.
According to this chronology (which we can name "Ultra High Revised Chronology"), Jesus died in 1086 AD. Read more
Published on April 28 2004 by Dr. Renata Scaffoldini
4.0 out of 5 stars Vicious Circle
The author is gone realy too far, but made, a few quite valid points. For example, the carbon-dating process is calibrated nowadays basis "known dates," i.e. Read more
Published on April 28 2004
5.0 out of 5 stars Fomenko is highly entertaining, if not on target
Fomenko is highly entertaining, if not on target
It should also be possible, as Fomenko states, to study regnal year lengths on a statistical basis. Read more
Published on April 28 2004 by Chris Marlowe
3.0 out of 5 stars one question
Why does it say up top that "Mick Jagger" is the translator? Is this an attempt at gaining a wider audience? (... Read more
Published on April 20 2004
1.0 out of 5 stars hands off science
mathematicians should stick to mathematics and leave history the hell alone, they wouldn't know common sense if it bit them - they might do well to calculate the geometry of their... Read more
Published on March 29 2004 by Conrad Henderson
1.0 out of 5 stars a complete abomination
So much as opening this book is an insult to your intelligence already. It is amazing someone published it at all, but I guess they publish anything these days, "Mein Kampf"... Read more
Published on March 26 2004 by Ian Bunting
1.0 out of 5 stars Lies, lies, lies
What a disgusting collection of lies. Stuff for ignorant nihilists who think it's cool to doubt everything, including the obvious - for instance, the existence of such famous... Read more
Published on March 26 2004 by "chad_parker55"
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Look for similar items by category


Feedback