Hombre (Widescreen)

 

 

Create your own review

The blue-eyed Paul Newman as a half-breed Apache? Weren't there quite a few folks a-waiting on a stage considering that the stagecoach company was practically defunct, presumably because of a lack of customers? Why didn't most of them, 'ceptin' the women folk, ride horses rather than take the stage? Why did they leave the water in the mine shaft? If you're sure the nasty bandito is going to shoot at you, why tell the kid to "wait 'til he reaches for his gun" before shooting him?
I asked a lot of questions while watching HOMBRE, and that usually ain't a good thing. Considering this was taken from a novel written by the usually reliable Elmore Leonard, it's a little mystifying as well.
A cynic would say these plot pimples were necessary to make things work. Look, you ain't gonna put brown contacts on Paul Newman's eyes, for criminy sake, and in 1967 there weren't many stars with stronger box office than Newman. We had to get the folks together on a stagecoach so Barbara Rush, the wife of corrupt Indian agent Frederic March, could get the vapors and see to it that half-breed John Russell (Newman) would be asked to ride on the roof. We had to keep the boys off the horses and on the benches because we needed to see bad guy Grimes (Richard Boone, excellent as usual) stink up the coach with his boorish manners and his cigars. They had to leave the water in the mine shaft so that the corrupt Indian agent Dr. Alex Favor (March) could reunite his venal self with the group.
That said, with all its question, HOMBRE is a good movie. In a beautiful opening scene a boss horse leads a group of wild horses into a corral. Director Martin Ritt is a master at sustained scenes that build with little or no dialogue.
HOMBRE belongs in that herd of movies that came out in the 60s and 70s that cast a critical eye on American culture. They reflected the tensions in society - hawks versus doves, pacifists versus Joe hardhats, the silent majority versus the vocal minority. Like other movies of that ilk, HOMBRE has a quasi-religious outsider at the center of the movie, and that central character is used to reflect and magnify the failures of society. In HOMBRE the white men are venal, immature, corrupt, evil and impotent.
The transitional figure, the one that links the hero to the dominant society, is the Mexican Henry Mendez (Martin Balsam.) That a movie attacking racism should cast the anything-but-latino Balsam is one of the sweet ironies of the time. Balsam is good, though, and in a pivotal scene with Russell he lays it out for him. Russell's adoptive uncle has died and leaves him a boarding house and some land. Leaves him a stake in society. He tells Russell, who is living on the reservation at the time, to get his haircut. Look like a white man. Make it easier on yourself. "A Mexican," Mendez says, " is closer to a white man than an Apache. I'll tell you that." Tune out, turn off and drop in, Hombre.
Well, quasi-religious figures in a Judeo- Christian culture haven't got a lot of options left by the time they reach the end of the last reel. For some strange reason we find ritual bloodletting deeply satisfying and a road sign to Higher Meaning. So be it. Many people will love HOMBRE for its passion. For my part, I'll remember with fondest pleasure watching Richard Boone guffaw, threaten, and intimidate his bad bad self through an otherwise okay western.
The only extras on this dvd are a clutch of theatrical trailers for Paul Newman movies. The trailer for THE HUSTLER has a snazzy, jazzy feel to it and I recommend it.

An Apache policeman John Russell (Paul Newman) inherits a boarding house and is off to sell it. He must travel by the last stage coach out of town. Naturedly we are introduces to each of his traveling companions and given the general background of their life stories. We have the standard mix of exadurated stereotypes.

You guessed it the stage is held up. Luckily for the other passengers John Russell, also know as Hombre was raised by the Indians. He is cool, calm, and decisive. The others are just a tad too pansy for reality. However it makes for a good story as they start to learn or not from John what it takes to survive. What they do not realize before it is too late is that John is doing more than just surviving. What on the surface seems like John is changing his ways in reality is an extension of what he was always about.

Classic tale with no surprises. But well told and well acted. There are plenty of "one liner's", quasi philosophy, and a fair amount of gun play. In all a very satisfying movie. Richard Boone's characterization of Cicero Grimes was better port raid than in his characterization "Have Gun Will Travel" series.

Some actors get type cast and all I could think of when watching Margaret Blye was her character in "Waterhole #3" (1967).

This movies has most elements of a good Western. It has cowboys and Indians, a stagecoach robbery, a shootout, the man (and woman) against nature theme, and much much more. Most of all, it has a great script, strong directing, and outstanding acting. Just about all of the characters are memorable for their performances but the soul of this movie is Paul Newman. His character is that of the quiet yet strong man who shares his thoughts with no one and takes no guff from anyone. The bad guy in this movie is nearly as memorable in the person of Richard Boone. He is about as evil a character as you will find in a G rated movie.

Then story is that of a man (Mr. Randall) who was raised on an Apache reservation in the Arizona Territory. He inherits some money and property and sets off to check out a different life style. On the way, he meets up with a diverse group of people on a stagecoach leaving town. Bad things happen but the only man who seemed equipped to handle things is Mr. Randall, played by Paul Newman. The movie explores the nature of good and evil which recalls the old Woody Guthrie line, "Some will rob you with a six-gun and some with a fountain pen". The movie also contrasts the values of the "savage" with that of civilization and you can probably guess who comes out ahead. This movie does not have a happy ending which is not unusual for a modern Western. Yet there is a true feeling that Good has prevailed.

This movie mixes plenty of action and thought-provoking situations and is a good movie for the whole family to enjoy.

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 30 customer reviews on Amazon.ca

 

5.0 out of 5 stars One of the Best Westerns Ever
Western films are not often thought to be intellectually edifying on matters of political philosophy. Read more

Published on Jan 1 2004 by Chris Dacus

3.0 out of 5 stars A mixed review
Hombre is a very good western. Newman is cool, Boone is a great Villian, the action is well done, and there are some pretty good lines of dialoge. Read more

Published on Dec 8 2003

4.0 out of 5 stars 'Hombre' is great example of the western in transition
"Hombre," one of Paul Newman's "H" movies of the 1960s, meanders along for its first two reels before things kick into overdrive with the introduction of Richard Boone's villain... Read more

Published on Nov 16 2003 by DBW

5.0 out of 5 stars Coolest Western Ever
Paul Newman in an unusual role in a western with a super cast. A tale of class, race, attitude and the human condition. It's a great movie. Read more

Published on Mar 20 2003 by M. Edgar

5.0 out of 5 stars AN OVERLOOKED CLASSIC
This is a flat-out great western, even though often it is overlooked on many "Best" lists. It is existential, yet spiritual. It has action, but not too much. Read more

Published on Jan 29 2003 by Glenn A. Buttkus

5.0 out of 5 stars Newman and Ritt make Western magic again
Whenever Paul Newman and Director Martin Ritt("Hud", "The Outrage") team up for a western it's pure magic. "Hombre" is a shining example of that. Read more

Published on Nov 2 2002 by L. Shirley

5.0 out of 5 stars Cicero Grimes, meet John Russell
A magnificent dramatization of a self-reliant egoist struggling to exist in a world of altruists, parasites, racists and pragmatists. Read more

Published on Aug 30 2002

5.0 out of 5 stars Maybe Newman's best (along with Nobody's Fool)
Okay, I admit it. I love a great western movie. This is one of them. It fits neatly within my collection that includes "The 3:10 to Yuma," "The Wild Bunch"... Read more

Published on Aug 14 2002 by David Ohman

5.0 out of 5 stars Newman at his absolute best
This is one of if not Paul Newman's best performance. He cooly delivers numerous cynical one liners that are unforgettable. Read more

Published on July 14 2002 by R. J. Marsella

4.0 out of 5 stars It's ok
Hombre isn't up the standards of Newman's best movies--The Hustler, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. But it is a pretty good movie. Read more

Published on July 11 2002 by adead_poet@hotmail.com

Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

› See all 30 customer reviews on Amazon.ca

Search Listmania!