Now that we've reached the post-postmodern era, presumably there's nobody left who needs liberating from the strictures of conventional fiction. So apart from its narrative high jinks, what does House of Leaves have to offer? According to Johnny Truant, the tattoo-shop apprentice who discovers Zampanò's work, once you read The Navidson Record,
For some reason, you will no longer be the person you believed you once were. You'll detect slow and subtle shifts going on all around you, more importantly shifts in you. Worse, you'll realize it's always been shifting, like a shimmer of sorts, a vast shimmer, only dark like a room. But you won't understand why or how.We'll have to take his word for it, however. As it's presented here, the description of the spooky film isn't continuous enough to have much scare power. Instead, we're pulled back into Johnny Truant's world through his footnotes, which he uses to discharge everything in his head, including the discovery of the manuscript, his encounters with people who knew Zampanò, and his own battles with drugs, sex, ennui, and a vague evil force. If The Navidson Record is a mad professor lecturing on the supernatural with rational-seeming conviction, Truant's footnotes are the manic student in the back of the auditorium, wigged out and furiously scribbling whoa-dude notes about life.
Despite his flaws, Truant is an appealingly earnest amateur editor--finding translators, tracking down sources, pointing out incongruities. Danielewski takes an academic's--or ex-academic's--glee in footnotes (the similarity to David Foster Wallace is almost too obvious to mention), as well as other bogus ivory-tower trappings such as interviews with celebrity scholars like Camille Paglia and Harold Bloom. And he stuffs highbrow and pop-culture references (and parodies) into the novel with the enthusiasm of an anarchist filling a pipe bomb with bits of junk metal. House of Leaves may not be the prettiest or most coherent collection, but if you're trying to blow stuff up, who cares? --John Ponyicsanyi
I don't get it.
The only explanation I can come up with is that the entire thing (Zampano, house, et al. Read more
Probably my favourite book ever. Completely engrossing with moments of terror. At one point, I and a friend of mine, both independent of each other, had to close the book after a... Read morePublished 2 months ago by Brian Edwards
I recommend this book to anyone who is looking for something unlike anything they have ever read before. Read morePublished 3 months ago by Clive Huxley
Weird but great!!! Just don't get caught up reading the footnotes. You don't need to.
A must read just for the fact you will never read a book format like this.
ever. I cannot recommend this enough - engaging, provocative and a genuine challenge. Do not hesitate to buy two and share with a friend - they'll love it tooPublished 13 months ago by Charles
CANT WAIT TO READ THIS BOOK IF ONLY SCHOOL IS DONE... oh im not done yet? wow this review words limit...Published on Jan. 25 2013 by Kris
I've had Mark Z. Danielewski's House of Leaves sitting on my shelf for about a decade. Since then, the novel has acquired a cult following and it is said to be one of the scariest... Read morePublished on Aug. 11 2012 by Patrick St-Denis, editor of Pat's Fantasy Hotlist
House of Leaves is a fantastic read- incredibly engaging and hard to put down. Both the "main" story and the side story were interesting, thought-provoking, and especially... Read morePublished on Feb. 6 2011 by C Worst