Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
House of Mirth, the
 
See larger image
 

House of Mirth, the

Gillian Anderson , Dan Aykroyd , Terence Davies    PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)   VHS Tape
3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (90 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.



Product Details


Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
The tragedy of Lily: Doing the right thing at the wrong time July 14 2002
By Lawrance M. Bernabo HALL OF FAME TOP 50 REVIEWER
Format:DVD
When we talk about great novels that deal with the downfall of a young woman, Edith Wharton's "The House of Mirth" does not get mentioned in the same breath with "Madame Bovary," "The Awakening," and "Anna Karenina." Certainly there are substantial differences since Wharton's heroine Lily Bart is not a married woman seeking comfort in an adulterous affair; she is a single woman searching for a husband, playing the game of flirtation, and weighing her options. But in the end her destruction makes her a kindred spirit to Emma Bovary and the others. In fact, because her sins are relatively small and her destruction so complete, Lily Bart is a much more memorable tragic figure.

I came to this film version of "The House of Mirth" with no expectations other than a breakthrough performance by actress Gillian Anderson in the role of Lily. As it dawned upon me that we were watching the complete and total destruction of a human being by the venal society of which she thought she was a permanent member, Anderson's performance took on a truly haunting aspect. The result is as restrained an emotional performance as you have ever seen, reflecting the slower tempo of the times depicted (watch the measured pace of Lily's walk, both in the opening sequence at the train station and when the gilded society walks up the massive staircase to the opera).

Like Lily, we have our expectations of the characters in this gilded society shattered as the story progresses and she begins her descent into hell. The man who comes to her financial assistance, Gus Trenor (Dan Aykroyd), is looking for something in return; the man who would take her as a trophy wife in a loveless marriage, Sim Rosedale (Anthony LaPaglia), is ultimately the only person who will treat her decently; the man she truly loves, Lawrence Selden (Eric Stoltz) is unworthy of her affections; and the man who would treat her the way she truly deserves, George Dorset (Terry Kinney), is married to the instrument of her destruction and therefore beyond her reach. The ultimate irony is that Lily's character has a strength greater than those around her, but it does her no good in the end, when even her personal dignity is not enough to sustain her.

The measured performances throughout this film are superb, but it is Laura Linney as Bertha Dorset who stands out with her ability to inject pure venom into a quick glance or a few well chosen words. Anderson was not exactly robbed of an Oscar nomination for her performance, but if she had received one no one would have blinked an eye. Certainly this role will open up some serious doors for her down the road as she enters the rest of her career after Scully. "The House of Mirth" lacks the spectacle of "Age of Innocence," but I do not want to dock a film rating stars because of how much money they had to put things on the screen. This film starts slowly but then builds up a compelling momentum.

Terence Davies audio commentary is extremely insightful (I especially like his comment on how American actors use their eyes), although he picks his moments, usually at the beginning of scenes. His emphasis is on both the adaptation of Wharton's novel and the actual production of the film. With regard to the former he talks about the decision to combine characters or other alterations, and takes great pleasure in identifying those lines which are his own creation rather than Wharton's. The latter topic evidences how the director solved the problems of an $8 million budget filming in and around Glascow. Davies talks less than half the time during the audio commentary, but what is there is certainly first-rate. He also provides a spirited defense of the deleted scenes, most of which are longer versions of those in the film and which provide additional layers of density to the complex character relationships. Clearly, Davies was a writer-director passionately involved in the creation of his film.

Was this review helpful to you?
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Disappointing July 3 2004
Format:DVD
It doesn't seem to matter how good a story is, and The house of Mirth is good, casting the right players makes the difference between great and dismal. Dan Akroyd seems to be reading his lines off a nearby wall. Gillian Anderson is beautiful but doesn't elicit sympathy for her role as 'heroine led astray'. Eric Stoltz is a fantastic actor but even he seems to struggle. The movie has sumptuous wardrobe and settings done with meticulous detail. Even so,it's hard to watch without wincing at Akroyd's embarrassing performance or hoping that the heroine falls in the mud.
Was this review helpful to you?
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
A Good Effort April 21 2004
Format:DVD
This film version of Edith Wharton's "The House of Mirth" should be commended as a good attempt to bring the classic 1900's novel of manners to the big screen. However, while the director makes a laudable effort to adhere to the text, there are too many missing pieces to encompass the entirety of the tragedy that is Lily Bart. The removal of key sequences and themes - her parental influences, the irony of charity, her personal fear of filth and dinginess, Selden's role as a spectator and Lily's art, and the final scene with Netty's baby - leaves us with a separated, disjointed view of Lily. In short, the lack of setting and background means that if you have not read the book, you will not like this film. It leaves too much to the imagination.

While Gillian Anderson gives a good portrayal of Lily, the other actors hardly do their characters justice. Dan Aykroyd should stick to "Ghostbusters" or "My Girl" rather than attempting Gus Trenor; he simply doesn't fit this role. Elizabeth McGovern is blunt and leaves me cold, when her written character has far more heart than we are given in this interpretation. Eric Stoltz's portrayal of Selden is perhaps the most divergent from the character we know in the novel, but apart from a bad interpretation of the character the actor himself comes across as insincere - he is not Wharton's Lawrence Selden.

Overall, the film is good, but it lacks the emotion, the background, and the establishment of setting that would have made it great. Granted, the two hour time of the film would have been far longer if the things I have pointed out were to be included, but maybe someday the BBC or A&E will take on the project and do it the full justice it deserves. But until then, do yourself a favour and read the book - and leave this film on the shelf until you do.

Was this review helpful to you?
Most recent customer reviews
Like Its Heroine, Beautiful But Flawed
erence Davies, the writer/director of this eye-catching but uneven adaptation of Edith Wharton's novel, is to be commended for presenting this work in such a visually beautiful... Read more
Published 6 months ago by Stephen John Vogel
a cautionery tale........
this film is excellent, but this i attribute in most part, the edith wharton's creating such a brilliant story. Read more
Published on Feb 3 2006
Heartbreaking
Couldn't help but feel the pain that the heroine went through. Wonderful film. I was surprised by Gillian Anderson's suberb acting because I had only seen her in the television... Read more
Published on July 14 2004
Uneven performance
The biggest flaw to this movie is the uneven performance put up by Anderson. She is great in the first half an hour, but her performance degenerates into pity (much like the... Read more
Published on April 13 2004 by Gadgester
Good acting with terrible dialogue
The acting in this beautifully shot movie was quite good, but unfortunately the script was terrible. Read more
Published on Mar 12 2004 by Kimberly Chapman
House of... oh, wait, did I fall asleep again?
I tried, I really, really tried to like this movie. But I just couldn't get through it. Three failed attempts to watch it later, I gave up. Read more
Published on Mar 11 2004 by Dionne A. Wood
Worst movie I have ever seen
This movie was pathetic and easily the worst movie I have ever seen since "Au Hazard Balthazar." Sound design was atrocious. Lighting was ridiculous. Read more
Published on Jan 29 2004
Excellent movie -
Haven't read the book - but this movie is absolutely fascinating and utterly successful as a demolisher of the hypocrisy, cruelty, neglect and emptiness of 'high society'. Read more
Published on Dec 21 2003 by H. Jadwani
Excellent acting!
Gillain Anderson was luminous in this movie, the acting by everyone was great and I was really moved by her character's
plight. A must see!
Published on Aug 21 2003 by D. G. Welch
Lovely and amazing...and doomed
This film came out more than half a dozen years after THE AGE OF INNOCENCE, but the earlier film enjoyed a much more widespread critical and financial success than THE HOUSE OF... Read more
Published on July 11 2003 by Lori L. Graham
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject





i.e., each video must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback