Auto boutiques-francophones Simple and secure cloud storage SmartSaver Kitchen All-New Kindle Paperwhite Music Deals Store SGG Home, Kitchen and Garden Gift Guide
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

How the End Begins: The Road to a Nuclear World War III Hardcover – Mar 1 2011

1 customer review

See all 6 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
CDN$ 2.19 CDN$ 0.01

Cyber Monday Deals Week in Books

No Kindle device required. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 320 pages
  • Publisher: Simon & Schuster (March 1 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1416594213
  • ISBN-13: 978-1416594215
  • Product Dimensions: 15.5 x 2.8 x 23.5 cm
  • Shipping Weight: 499 g
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #472,780 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  •  Would you like to update product info, give feedback on images, or tell us about a lower price?

Product Description


“The virtues of How the End Begins are numerous and impressive . . . this is a deep meditation on the role, meaning, and possible consequences of nuclear weapons in our time.”

—Michael Anton, The Weekly Standard

"Is there a scenario in which nuclear retaliation would be moral? Rosenbaum’s answer is a definitive no. Any reader of this upsetting book will be convinced that he’s right."

--Nathaniel Rich, The Daily Beast

About the Author

Ron Rosenbaum is the bestselling author of Explaining Hitler and The Shakespeare Wars and has written or edited six other books. His work has appeared in The New York Times, Harper’s, The Atlantic, and The New Yorker. He writes a column for Slate and lives in New York City.

Inside This Book

(Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most helpful customer reviews

By Joe Sinko on Nov. 15 2014
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.
Report abuse

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 22 reviews
41 of 51 people found the following review helpful
Not as good as I expected March 9 2011
By Graham DeShazo - Published on
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This book is long on supposition, conjecture, and theory (as well as a heavy-handed dose of personal morality), and short on facts and the type of stories and details I was looking for. To the extent that stories and examples were given, they were oversold.
I respect the author's opinion, but I think it is poorly defended and subject to considerable question.

In addition, the book digresses way too far into subjects of religion and philosophy.

Finally, and I hate to say this part the most, the book is kind of boring. The prose is (again) heavy-handed as well as long-winded. I found myself skipping ahead, which is something I never do.

I did manage to finish the book, but I was left with a sense of buyer's remorse.

If you describe yourself as a "zeroer", you will find much to your liking. Otherwise, you will probably find little to change your mind.
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful
Basically an internal monologue May 23 2011
By Joey Bee - Published on
Format: Hardcover
This book strikes me as a great New Yorker or Atlantic Monthly article that was streched into a book with less than optimal results. You get some really chilling information and assessments, which are unfortunately wrapped around Rosenbaum basically debating morality with himself. There's a great deal missing here - it's a shame, because it is such a compelling topic, but it isn't done justice here.
12 of 16 people found the following review helpful
Truly Sobering March 11 2011
By Amazon Customer - Published on
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Rosenbaum sheds light on a subject that gets surprisingly little press coverage these days, painting a sobering picture of the very real threat that nuclear weapons pose. Interestingly, he makes a case for abolition/reduction of nuclear weapons but also preemption of would-be nuclear powers. Before reading this book, I never appreciated how compatible those two positions could be.

On more than one occasion I wanted to forget what I've learned from this book, but that wouldn't make any of it less true. The subject matter is pretty heavy, and I came away with the same feeling of unease I felt after the laughs wore off in Dr. Strangelove. Nonetheless, I would recommend this to a friend.
9 of 12 people found the following review helpful
I think this book is dishonest April 7 2012
By BernardZ - Published on
Format: Hardcover
The basic problem with nuclear weapons is that they exist. You can build them with 1940s technology, if you want an intercontinental ballistic missile, you can build that with 1950s technology. Over time as the world gets richer and technology improves it gets easier to make these. Right now, many countries if they wanted to, could develop nuclear weapons and a variety of WMD. Despite the best efforts of scientist and engineers, there is no credible defense against these weapons so the only policy that has worked up to now is assured retaliation (MAD). In this debate steps in the author of this book.

The major question that seems to concern the author is once someone launches nuclear weapons. What is the morality of nuclear retaliation? Say side A does an atomic strike on side B, is it moral for side B to retaliate? Of course, the real problem here is if side A thinks that side B will not retaliate; they may be very tempted to strike.

I think the writer, is dishonest with his facts. For example, he must know that it is questionable whether Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov's decision had much to do with preventing nuclear war as plenty is available on the net about it.
I am sure he is misrepresenting the facts on purpose about the US nuclear triad policy. It is expensive, but the point of it is not for first strike. The idea is by having a variety of methods of retaliations it makes it harder for the other side to make a successful first-strike on the US so giving the US a more credible threat of a second strike. If, for example, say the USSR did develop the blue-green laser that could detect submarines, which people had been working on? This could make the US nuclear submarines useless as a second strike, if so, the US would still have planes and land-based missiles as a second strike. I am sure the author knows of this project too. It might work and if so it would make his submarine solution useless.

Then when talking about such people like Herman Kahn, he just seems to brush aside their arguments like they do not matter. If he does not like someone's arguments, he makes them out to be stupid.

At the end, the writer of this book has not presented a credible alternative to MAD.
20 of 28 people found the following review helpful
Terminally scary March 3 2011
By Prof. Bunny - Published on
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I hope Ron Rosenbaum donates his brain to science. I suspect it's an extra-large. But the difference between him and your garden-variety genius is that Rosenbaum's intellect is impassioned through and through. And he manages to pull those same emotions out of the reader as he parses the greatest question of our time: whether we are, by basic design, self-destructive. Taking on the big topics is Rosenbaum's beat: the existence of evil in his book "Explaining Hitler," and the miracle of genius in his book on Shakespeare. These are not dry exegeses; they are not merely researched but fully experienced by the author as he, for example, travels to a nuclear command center in Omaha or meets with key industry characters. He identifies the humans who hold the keys to our annihilation. And he scares us silly. This book is a warning, a Cassandra cry, and a must-read.