5.0 out of 5 stars
Pennsauken's errors, July 7 2004
This review is from: In His Image: Book One of the Christ Clone Trilogy (Hardcover)
The previous reviewer (a reader from Pennsauken, NY) quotes a line from IN HIS IMAGE. He even does it correctly. But he fails to notice that the book states that the narrative starts "20 years ago." Thus the "then-current method(s)" refers to dating methods available in 1983 not what was done in 1988. The reviewer also fails to notice that on the page BEFORE the quoted line, BeauSeigneur himself refers to the 1988 C-14 tests, both in the narrative AND in a footnote.
The Christ Clone Trilogy is fiction, but it is among the best researched an presented fiction written in any genre. Before the reader from Pennsauken slams a book, he should do more than skim the text.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1.0 out of 5 stars
Might be good as a fantasy book, July 6 2004
By A Customer
In the first few pages of this book published in 2003,we are informed "Every type of nondestructive test that Decker could imagine was included. One experiment that had been rejected was carbon 14 dating, because the then-current method would have required that a large piece of the Shroud be destroyed to yield an accurate measurement."
And yet in the real world Samples were taken from the Shroud on 21 April, 1988, and given to laboratories in Arizona, Oxford and Zurich for testing where it has been proven beyond any reasonable
doubt (notice the word reasonable, not nutball), that the shroud was a fraud worked up around the 14th century.
That kind of kills my interest in this gibberish right at the start of the 'novel'. If Christian literature is ever going to escape the big-foot, UFO category, these folks are going to have to start paying attention to reality a little bit more.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3.0 out of 5 stars
Holy Disappointment- Revised!, Jun 21 2004
This review is from: In His Image: Book One of the Christ Clone Trilogy (Hardcover)
I wrote this review hastily....and didn't really give the author the credit I was intending...so I have revised it....
I normally avoid modern thriller fiction....especially modern 'you can read this during in-flight service from Boston to D.C.' - and for some reason I keep feeling the need to remind myself why by reading modern thriller fiction.....
So here we go. Great Premise! That is what earned my three star rating of the book...just the premise. A journalist finds himself enlisted to a team of scientists who attempt to carbon-date the Shroud of Turin, the burial cloth said to be embossed with the image of Christ. One scientist removes dna samples (via fibers left on the shroud)and uses them to clone Christ....or so it would seem.
Flash forward years later, where the hot premise is dropped like a hot potato...and the book becomes little more than the average, dime-a-dozen political/war books...and many do it more effectively. The author is to be commended for going back and revising the book since the original publication to include such incidents as September 11th, the War on Terror, and the slaying of journalist Daniel Pearl....but after finishing the book....it seems like his effort is wasted in trying to put a shiny coating on a permanently dulled floor.
The characters are perhaps a bit more interesting than your usual Tom Clancy Rogues gallery, but are lost amidst the nuclear bombs, political maneuvering, and usurping of authority that comprise three quarters of this book.
Dull, dull, dull...except for those rare moments when Christopher Goodman, the 'clone' of Christ, displays his 'powers'. Other than that....the story loses grip on what interested me in the first place. Knowing that it is book one of a trilogy (and now knowing from the author himself that it was originally one large text) and knowing that the author has revised the story since initial publication....perhaps those revisions could have included more evidence of Christopher's powers being put to test/use, and a little more focus on what I assume is intended to be the main focus of the story, a clone of Christ??
Sorry to say, but (for me) this only served as a good reminder as to why I usually stick to the classics for a good story....with rare exception. The book is well written, I give it that....but I am a sucker for good in-depth characterization and this story just fails to deliver that for me. I have been encouraged to continue on in the trilogy, by the author, and perhaps some day I might. For anyone interested in a timely topic (cloning) and political/military/war intrigue, this will interest you.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No