Inside Man [Blu-ray]

 

 

Create your own review

"My name is Dalton Russell. Pay strict attention to what I say because I choose my words carefully and I never repeat myself."

It is so great to go to a movie and have it fulfill high expectations for one. The trailer and the television commercials for "Inside Man" piqued my curiosity, and since Denzel Washington, Clive Owen and Jodie Foster signed on, and Spike Lee ended up directing the movie, I decided I had to go see the first showing the first day do that I could find out what exactly is the game going on with this bank robbery that is not a bank robbery. I figured that armed with the idea that the perfect crime is the one that you do not know has been committed,

Dalton Russell (Owen), the man who came up with this perfect crime, might not repeat himself, but the words he speaks into the camera at the beginning of the film are repeated when the revelation comes and you see the total audacity of his plan. This is one of those movies where somebody tells you what they are doing and it does not matter because you are probably not going to figure it out (okay, some people will, but they are either smarter than me or we are talking the old saying about blind hogs). Detective Keith Frazier (Washington), is in the hostage negotiator in charge, with fellow Detective Bill Mitchell (Chiwetel Ejiofor), at his side. The bank in question belongs to Arthur Case (Christopher Plummer) and clearly the last thing he is worried about is the money that is there. So he contacts Madeliene White (Foster), who has always been the sort of woman who arranges thing for a nice but not necessarily small fee.

It takes Frazier a while to catch on that the guy in charge inside the bank is the smartest one in the game (or, at the very least, he has all of the angles figured out). Certainly when White comes away from her face-to-face with the masked man in the bank she knows that this guy is so far ahead of her she is never going to catch up. But a key thing here is that these are smart people, capable of making mistakes but also able to make the necessary connections that lead to explaining what the hell is going on here. Also, it was nice to see that the cops in this film were pretty competent for the most part, from the first cop on the scene to Captain Darius (Willem Dafoe), who is in charge of the tactical part of the operation. I was wondering if this might be post-9/11 good will, but actually it is necessary for the film to work: the cops have to be competent. The whole point is to beat them at their best.

The screenplay is written by Russell Gewirtz, and since this is his first filmed script he is either going to be one of the hottest scribes in Hollywood or he is going to spend the rest of his life trying to prove this one is no fluke. I think Spike Lee had a hand in some of the bits, simply because there are so few moments where "Inside Man" seems like a Spike Lee Joint and you remember who is directing this one (admit it: you were surprised this was a 40 Acres and Mule film). Things really move in this one and you never get the sense of it being a drawn out hostage crisis. Besides, it is also a way of not giving you time to figure out what is going on. Even when we get flashforwards to Frazier and Mitchell interviewing the hostages (or are they the criminals?), the film is not doing us any real favors.

Of course you want to try and figure out what is going on, because that is part of the fun. As soon as "Chaiyya Chaiyya" starts playing I am trying to figure out what sort of clue this song from the "Bombay Dreams" cast album has to do with the story. But Gewirtz is to us as Dalton is to the police; there is a point early one when you turn to each other and think you have spotted a key clue (off of the "Ten Little Indians" rule that if you do not see something, then it did not happen). But this is just one of several insidious red herrings, some of which are brilliantly put in the commercials. Afterwards if you stop and think about it you can find minor flaws in the story, but that is true of any such story. When the last act begins I leapt to a correct conclusion, which got me thinking that when Frazier completed his interviews he would come to the same conclusion, albeit by a different method. Even so, I seriously doubt that you will be disappointed by the way this one plays out.

There are a few moments when Lee gets a bit cute with what he is doing (e.g., Denzel on a moving platform), but he is allowed to indulge. Washington makes wearing a hat look good again and while the character Owen plays requires him to do the same sort of barely modulated monotone he always seems to be doing it is Foster who has the most fun playing a role without a scintilla of the vulnerability that are her trademark and reminding us there is a level beyond the b-word. She has the cold smile of a snake down pretty good. Final Note: As usual I was the only one who stuck around for all of the credits, but the totally addictive opening song comes back at the end, this time as a "Chaiyya Chaiyya Bollywood Joint" variation. Since I still had ice left in my drink, I was able to shake it as an impromptu percussion instrument, but I still have no clue as to what it signifies for the movie.

I have always been a big Denzel Washington fan. He is excellent in this movie as is Clive Owen, another favourite of mine. Denzel has a lot of humour in his dialogue and excels at this also. A real twist at the end makes for a great ending.

I just finished watching "Inside Man" (2006) on TV (with Denzel Washington, Clive Owen, Jodie Foster, Christopher Plummer, Willem Dafoe). Washington plays an ambitious, smooth talking NY detective. Owen plays an ivy league bank robber (probably a history buff). Foster is an expensive "fixer" with connections in high places. Plummer owns the bank, and harbours 50-year old secrets. These are the main characters. I heard this was a heist film so was not really interested in seeing it, but I was wrong to judge this film by its genre. I was pleasantly SURPRISED by the intelligence this film exudes throughout. The "heist" (bank robbery) is actually of secondary importance to the underlying storyline. It merely sets the stage, and mobilizes the characters into a dance with each other. The well thought out master plan for the heist does not include stealing the many piles of neatly stacked money that is laid bare in the inner sanctum of the bank. Other forms of currency are worth more in that the rightful owners of this property are unable to declare anything missing. The items removed from safety deposit box 362 cannot be traced. The perfect crime. Although the four major players begin with seemingly opposing agendas, they quickly find themselves able to communicate easily with one another. And one aspect of human nature puts them on common ground in end. Intrigue builds to a crescendo as the movie progresses to its conclusion. This is a film that is WELL WORTH SEEING - AT LEAST TWICE. For those who like movies with intrigue, drama, character development, action, etc., this one's a win/win/winner.

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 9 customer reviews on Amazon.ca

 

4.0 out of 5 stars [3.5]--Solid heist thriller that puts a new spin on the familiar tale
`Inside Man' is a good film. It's essentially a standard hostage situation thriller that wasn't over the top. Read more

Published on July 3 2007 by Jenny J.J.I.

1.0 out of 5 stars Suck My Spike Lee Joint
This movie proves that Spike Lee was a flash in the pan, a one hit wonder. Do The Right Thing was a great movie, but nothing in Lee's filmography has measured up since (with the... Read more

Published on Mar 10 2007 by M. Kennedy

4.0 out of 5 stars Clever story, if a tad unresolved
I wanted to see this because I enjoy Clive Owen's movies, and I think he's a great actor. For this role, playing Dalton Russell who's implementing the perfect bank robbery with... Read more

Published on Jan 16 2007 by Serendipity

4.0 out of 5 stars A well made Drama
For those of you that were not intelligent enough to realize this movie was a Drama and not an Action movie then you have wasted your time. Read more

Published on Aug 30 2006 by Josh Rawlings

2.0 out of 5 stars this isnt what i expected wheres the action?
when i seen this movie i was dissapointed cuz i thot it was gunna b a hudge action movie. but there was like what 2 action scenes. i was highly dissapointed. Read more

Published on Aug 22 2006 by kirk

2.0 out of 5 stars Big plot holes, inconsistant tone, pointless tangents
This movie sets out to be a thriller but gets lost along the way. The twists pretaining to the heist plot are amusing and good actors keep it interesting but this movie goes off... Read more

Published on Aug 1 2006 by W. Boettger

Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

› See all 9 customer reviews on Amazon.ca

Search Listmania!