3.0 out of 5 stars
not bad,but not as good as the original, Aug 31 2007
in many ways,i thought this movie was not as good as the 1st.yes,it is
truer to the animated show in many respects.in fact,id say it is too
true to the cartoon.in this case,the cartoon does not translate too
well into live action.in the 1st,they veered away from the cartoon
quite a bit and that worked for me.in this movie, "Dr Claw" seemed way
too over the top and not in a good way.the character sounded more
stupid than anything.i think they tried too hard to make him seem evil
and instead made him a caricature.the henchmen were dimwitted,just like
the cartoon,but that seemed to work in this movie.most of the humour is
of the type that young kids would find funny,but most adults probably
wouldn't.as for the title character,i found he was was too idiotic(it
worked in the cartoon,but not here),at 1st,but after awhile he became
somewhat endearing.there are few things a liked about the movie.i liked
the fact that Penny had a bigger role to play,and i also liked the fact
that Gadget had some competition/decent romantic
interest.overall,though,i didn't think this movie measured up to the
original,though it had its moments.for me "Inspector Gadget 2" is a
3/5
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1.0 out of 5 stars
Oh, the humanity... er, cyborgity!, Jun 14 2004
A little known tidbit about the history of Philadelphia: Channel 48, once known under the call letters WKBS, liquidated their assets in 1983 due to increasing problems with their transmitter lease. The station signed off on August 29 -- but not before going out with a bang. Using the last of their resources, their final half-hour was used to broadcast the first episode of a never-before-seen cartoon, one that would serve to change, in it's own small way, the cultural landscape of America.
That cartoon was Inspector Gadget. (Incidentally, a Google search of the program's airdates lists the earliest known broadcast of the series as September 5, 1983. Channel 48 may not have bothered to log it's final program to the FCC -- but trust me, I was there. They had it first.)
The continuing adventures of the bumbling cybernetic detective hold a special place in my heart because of this strange and fateful day. Channel 48 was a beloved station -- for many of my school years they broadcast Pink Panther for two hours every day(!) as well as such wonderous cult 'toons as Tenessee Tuxedo. It was a crushing blow to my young heart to bid farewell to that old, treasured friend, but their maverick decision to end with the very first broadcast of Gadget was an fond, fitting tribute.
I watched Gadget on Channel 17, who picked it up the following year, religiously. Often I would rush home from school, determined not to miss the antics of the robotic constable, the case-cracking skills of his behind-the-scenes niece Penny and her dog Brain, and the sinister growl of the menacing Doctor Claw: "I'LL GET YOU NEXT TIME, GADGET!"
So it was with a deep and abiding love that, when I spotted this film on the used DVD rack at my local record shop, I gladly forked over the twelve bucks to revisit my childhood one last time.
But instead, I ended up feeling like my inner child had been spanked and sent to bed without dinner. Dear Lord, this movie is terrible. Really, truly, terrible. Not a single redeeming quality about it. French Stewart may be the worst comedic actor known to humanity, accurately desribed by a friend of mine as "Like Kramer from Seinfeld, except not funny" -- I honestly think Carrot Top would have been a better choice, and I HATE Carrot Top. And though Eliane Hendrix provides that safe Disney level of mildly enticing sex appeal, her patently robotic acting is only barely forgiven by the fact that, well, she's LITERALLY playing a robot. And that incessantly unfunny car! Can we please have a modern comedy which doesn't try to infect some form of satirically cliched, urbanized Chris Rock Lite stupidity into it? Tupac is rolling over in his grave right now!
It's terrible. Disney has once again ruined the beloved characters of literary history, as they did with Hercules, the Hunchback of Notre Dame, and the Little Mermaid. Maybe I'm reaching a little there by putting Gadget in such notable, royal company, but if in my passion I take such liberties, I beg you all to forgive me my indulgence -- certainly it's not nearly as insulting as the liberty that Eisner and company have taken in turning our favorite stories into Technicolored tripe.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No