5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Immersed in the Matrix: Interrogating Kant's Idealism, April 29 2009
By Jomo K "Educator" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Introduction to Kant's Anthropology (Paperback)
The Matrix - great movie, right? A visual restatement of Plato's Cave, but set in modern times...where we are all seated in front of a fire and immersed in our own shadows (the matrix) on the wall, or what Schopenhauer called the Veil of Maya. So Kant comes along and says, like Plato, that we can choose to stand, exit the Cave, and be awash in a transcendental, universal truth. Wow! What a promise!
French thinker Michel Foucault, conversely, remains overtly unsure of - or even hostile to - this vague promise of any metaphysical realm that exists "out there;" rather, he is more interested in how we determine Selfhood empirically, that is, via our shared space as "citizens," i.e., through culture, language, etc. As Foucault writes in his commentary to this text, he is seeking to investigate the "self which is object and present only in its phenomenal truth."
Foucault's project in this slim volume, then, is to juxtapose Kant's Idealism with Kant's Anthropology. Although I have read just about everything else both Kant and Foucault have written, I still struggled mightily with this book. Frankly, it was stiff and boring at first. I lost track of what Foucault was trying to accomplish. Yet, I stuck with it, and slowly, the text began to shine. Perhaps: it was not the text that shone, really, but Foucault's project in general - psychology not as some metaphysical, ghostlike object, but rather, as embedded within our empirical, everyday lives.
Logistically, Introduction to Kant's Anthropology was Foucault's "complementary doctoral thesis," and is not well known outside of academic circles. As such, it reads like a doctoral thesis, which is to say, it is not as smooth reading as his other brilliantly accessible texts are, nor is the thesis as clearly developed (and restated) as his other work. Despite some rough translation, a few typos, and some hard to penetrate ideas, the book is well-worth a good read.
If any of this makes sense, then I think you will enjoy this slim but philosophically dense volume. It really is a niche book...and it might even make you rent The Matrix one more time.
A must for any Foucault library!