Vous voulez voir cette page en français ? Cliquez ici.

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

John Dewey & Decline Of American Education: How Patron Saint Of Schools Has Corrupted Teaching & Learning [Paperback]

Henry T. Edmondson III
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  

Book Description

Jan 1 2006
The influence of John Dewey's undeniably pervasive ideas on the course of American education during the last half-century has been celebrated in some quarters and decried in others. But Dewey's writings themselves have not often been analyzed in a sustained way. In John Dewey and the Decline of American Education, Hank Edmondson takes up that task. He begins with an account of the startling authority with which Dewey's fundamental principles have been-and continue to be-received within the U.S. educational establishment. Edmondson then shows how revolutionary these principles are in light of the classical and Christian traditions. Finally, he persuasively demonstrates that Dewey has had an insidious effect on American democracy through the baneful impact his core ideas have had in our nation's classrooms. Few people are pleased with the performance of our public schools. Eschewing polemic in favor of understanding, Edmondson's study of the "patron saint" of those schools sheds much-needed light on both the ideas that bear much responsibility for their decline and the alternative principles that could spur their recovery.
 
What They're Saying...

"Edmondson’s critique of Dewey is useful, clear, and brief. He rightly sees Rousseau’s primitivism as a major influence, and he rightly distinguishes Dewey from Jefferson, whose reputation and lineage Dewey was eager to claim as his own."
M.D. Aeschliman, The National Review

"A distinguished Southern scholar who has written widely on ethics and literature, including on Flannery O'Connor and J.R.R. Tolkien, Edmondson has bravely trekked through the desert wastes of forty volumes of what must be the most muddled prose to ever attain to such demonic power over a culture. Keeping his bearings by the polestars of Plato, Aristotle, Newman, Chesterton, and others who understand genuine education as Edmondson tracks the beast of educationism to its ultimate lair, where lie the scattered bones of countless students devoured by relativism and nihilism."
New Oxford Review

"Edmondson excels in demonstrating that the problem with public education in this country is not just a matter of bad policy (although there is certainly plenty of that going on); it goes much deeper. It is a matter of faulty philosophy...Edmondson lays out many more detailed suggestions, making this book not only informative but also a very capable handbook for moving educational reform in the right direction."
Townhall.com

"John Dewey believed that education was the key to social change. Yet as Henry T. Edmondson effectively shows in his new book, Dewey could not defy the inherent contradiction of his own philosophy, which has left an indelible mark on American education."
Claremont Review of Books

"While all of his suggestions are meritorious, Edmondson's greatest contribution toward school reform is his overall conclusion....One hopes that Edmondson's book, dedicated to teachers, will spark the long road to renewal."
Crisis

"Today, of course, public education has come under severe criticism and no book that I've read better explains the root cause of our national educational dilemma then Henry Edmondson's John Dewey and the Decline of American Education.
Bob Cheeks, IntellectualConservative.com

"Edmondson doesn't draw the conclusion, but one puts this book down with the conviction that unless control of primary and secondary education is wrested from the U.S. educational establishment, corrective measures are not likely to occur."
Jude P. Dougherty, The Catholic University of America

"If the title of Henry T. Edmondson's book leaves any room for doubt as to his views on John Dewey and [his] educational theories, the book's subtitle should make clear Edmondson's belief: Dewey's lasting influence on the U.S. education system has wrought nothing but diminishing returns, if not all-out catastrophic results."
Bruce Edward Walker Michigan Education Report

"…a bold indictment of one of the fathers of modern educational thought and practise…Edmondson's critique of Dewey is in the vein of conservative scholars such as Allan Bloom and Diane Ravitch, who have voiced similar concerns regarding the loss of tradition in education. It is clear that Edmondson also believes that education can regain prominence only by abandoning Deweyan progressivism and embracing traditional Western values."
Perdue University Press, Education and Culture


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details


Product Description

About the Author

Henry T. Edmondson III is Professor of Public Administration and Political Science at the Georgia College and State University in Milledgeville, Georgia. Besides Dewey, he has written a number of articles and books on Jefferson, Shakespeare, and Flannery O'Connor, including the recently published Return to Good and Evil: Flannery O'Connor's Response to Nihilism.

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
5.0 out of 5 stars
5.0 out of 5 stars
Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Harper Lee on Dewey Feb 12 2010
By Michael W. Perry TOP 500 REVIEWER
Format:Paperback
I came across this book by an unusual path. I'm writing a book about Harper Lee's great classic, To Kill a Mockingbird, and I noticed that her already literate Scout thought that the teaching techniques of her first grade teacher were ridiculous and worse. Later, her brother tells her that her teacher was following something new (in 1930s Alabama) called the "Dewey Decimal System."

The more I thought about it, the more clearly I realized that, as a six-year-old, Scout had a much better understanding of what the disadvantaged kids at her school needed than the much esteemed dean of American education, John Dewey. The author of this book recognizes that and quotes Lee in his Preface. He also has this to say on page 45:

"To be sure, Dewey offers an unsettling commentary about the use of books in education. He says that in an earlier educational era the school needed to supply books to students because books were otherwise unavailable... 'But conditions change,' Dewey insists, as 'libraries abound, books are many and cheap, magazines and newspapers are everywhere.' For that reason, 'the schools do not any longer bear the peculiar relation to books and knowledge which they once did.'"

Dewey's comments were, of course, true of the privileged kids who attended the University of Chicago's University Elementary School where he did research. But they weren't remotely true of millions of children at the time he wrote that (or even today). Scout, with her innate good sense, was picking up on just how harmful Dewey's ideas are for all but the most privileged of children. Dewey wanted to keep books away from kids whose homes had no books. And as Scout notes, he wanted poor farm kids, whose lives were already filled with the drudgery of farm labor, to be given a romanticized experience with milking a cow. How ridiculous!

What are we to make of that? It's hard to imagine Dewey being as unintelligent as his remarks about books seem to suggest. Over time, I've come to the conclusion that G. K. Chesterton was right, that there are many people in our world who are solely interested in "making good," meaning being recognized for their alleged achievements. They have no interest in being good, meaning actually accomplishing something good even if no one notices.

Dewey wasn't interested in the slightest what impact his theories had on actual school children. Those sorts of thought never entered his mind. What concerned him was developing various schemes and theories that created circles of adoring disciples, which is precisely what happened.

Edmondson's book is a concise and excellent explanation of what Dewey taught, at least to the extent that Dewey's often muddled and self-promoting ideas can be called a system. It also links the problems with the "Dewey Decimal System" of To Kill a Mockingbird with the same failures in modern education that a fictional Scout was noticing in 1933.

After you finish this book, you just might want to read To Kill a Mockingbird for what Scout had to say about Dewey and those who follow him.

--Michael W. Perry, author of Untangling Tolkien: A Chronology and Commentary for The Lord of the Rings
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 3.8 out of 5 stars  12 reviews
11 of 16 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Utilizes Clear and Articulate Rhetoric Feb 22 2009
By Blake R. Oakley - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
For contemporary educators, this work will prove to be an invaluable resource. Even if, when finished, you find that you disagree with the arguments crafted, you will still be forced to think deeply about the many issues and dichotomies surrounding the various directions of educational philosophy.
23 of 36 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Persuasive, but misleading May 21 2008
By C. P. Williams - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
I was teaching first-grade in Brooklyn when I read this book, and found a lot of Edmondson's arguments persuasive, given my classroom experience. Deweyan pedagogy is challenging, if not in some ways damaging, to implement even in the smallest ways in an actual classroom. That said, Edmondson's book isn't really about Dewey or his thought. It's a political work, which repeats a number of points made by educational traditionalists, but doesn't really represent Dewey's thought accurately, or engage with him critically in a serious way. Edmondson takes the portrait of Dewey presented by Russell Kirk in "The Conservative Mind" and imputes it to Dewey. Again, let me stress, I often agreed with Edmondson's assessment of American education, but his book is NOT an accurate or effective account of Dewey's thought and what's wrong with it. John Patrick Diggins' "The Promise of Pragmatism" remains the best account of Dewey's flaws, though it is primarily political, rather than pedagogical.
14 of 23 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Unravels many threads in a profound mystery May 6 2008
By Suppresst - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
In 51 years of observing and experiencing the public education system in America I formed three broad impressions. The first was that educators must have a fondness for experimentation, since they always seemed to be reinventing the wheel. The second, was that all this reinventing was disturbing considering that those same educators didn't even seem to have a firm grasp on what outcome they desired. The third impression I had was that all the experimentation must be good for educators in the sense that it probably gives them ample excuse to go on taxpayer funded junkets to symposiums in swank places like San Franciso; all in the name of discovering the next best "method" of educating children. This book has made it clear why I developed those impressions over the years. The author of all the chaos in the schools is a man who wrote 130 books/papers on educational theory but could not manage or get results in the one actual classroom he taught in - namely John Dewy. Only a liberal could follow such a blind guide. Dewey might be likened to a Jimmy Carter of Education.

This book is not as in-depth as one might like, but the author points out in the preface that oceans of ink have already been spilled over Dewey and his theories. This book seeks to cut through those oceans and offer a brief and devastating critique of the reckless experimenter named Dewey. Dewey serves as type of person who thinks he knows better than parents how to raise and educate children, and who flippantly would use children as pawns in an end-game of social engineering. Sort of sounds like Marxism doesn't it?
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Feedback