Karla: A Pact with the Devil [Paperback]

Karla Homolka is an enigma. After a decade of investigation, a previous book about the case (Invisible Darkness), access to police officers, attorneys, doctors, and internal documents, and correspondence with the subject herself, that is the upshot of author Stephen Williams's updated account, Pact with the Devil. No kidding. People who commit the kind of crimes Homolka committed--drugging, raping, and ultimately killing her own sister and helping to abduct and sexually assault two other teenaged girls--cannot be knowable to the rational. The gist of the author's new, rambling book is that everything about the case--not just the crimes--was a travesty. Few people in Pact with the Devil emerge worse than Inspector Vince Bevan, head of the Green Ribbon Task Force that investigated the deaths of abducted teens Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy. Williams states flatly that Bevan's ineptitude and hubris were the real reasons Homolka received a lenient plea-bargain deal in exchange for testifying against her husband, Paul Bernardo, and not a lack of evidence. "The deal with Karla was precipitated by Vince Bevan so that he could participate in the arrest of Paul Bernardo and execute his own search warrant on their matrimonial home." (The Toronto Police already had DNA evidence fingering Bernardo as the "Scarborough Rapist"; Bevan, Williams argues, wanted to keep him in his own Niagara-region jurisdiction to face murder charges first.) Williams also contends that Bevan's "unusual and arguably inappropriate relationship" with the owners of the Port Dalhousie home rented by Homolka and Bernardo led him to withhold "the internal devastation another police force ... would have invariably unleashed on the interior of the house." And indeed, after 69 days, the search failed to discover trace vomit from French on a carpet or the videotapes Homolka and Bernardo had made of their brutal attacks and hidden in an upstairs bathroom. Also compelling is Williams's summary dismissal of Homolka as a compliant victim of a sexual sadist or a battered woman suffering post-traumatic stress disorder--diagnoses supported by many of her doctors. As Williams points out, those assessments conveniently overlook the fact that prior to her marriage, when Tammy Lyn Homolka was killed, Karla Homolka was living with her parents and sisters, not alone under the influence of Bernardo.

But Pact with the Devil is also a frustrating, uneven read. The author favours 10-dollar words, goes off on ludicrous tangents, and soapboxes against his critics. While the graphic nature of many scenes will sicken readers, the sensationalized jailhouse correspondence between the author and Homolka consists mainly of longwinded and mundane accounts of her incarceration. Perhaps most odious, the victims' families, despite everything else they've endured, must now deal with photos in the first printing of Williams's book depicting the Tammy Lyn post-mortem and Mahaffy dismembered and encased in cement--photos gathered as part of the investigation that should never have been made public (future printings will not include the photos). All that aside, Williams succeeds in leaving little doubt of bungling across the board. Tammy Lyn's death was initially ruled an accident in part because the investigating officers photographed--but failed to watch!--the videotape Homolka and Bernardo had made of her rape and left in plain view. Millions upon millions of taxpayer dollars were needlessly squandered. And Karla, thanks to her deal, walks absolutely free in July 2005 despite her documented participation in these crimes. --Kim Hughes

The Bernardo/Homolka crimes and trials of the 1990s were as much about the excesses of the sensational press as they were about the failures of a particular police investigation and subsequent prosecution. In fact, with those two equally compelling tributaries to follow, one could be forgiven for forgetting the main stream of the story is one of cruelty, murder and the hideous moral twists to be found in humanity.
That this latest book to offer insight into some of Canada's most notorious crimes should also be an easy target for accusations of sensationalism is sadly ironic, especially when one considers the good, hard work of the author, Stephen Williams, in researching the stunning official incompetence that will result in Karla Homolka walking free in a couple of years, and in cleverly tapping into the cagey mind and weak character of a brutal criminal.
Williams' publisher, Pierre Turgeon of Cantos and Trait d'union made a big splash for his fledgling publishing firm by choosing Karla as his first book in English after most other English-language presses had shunned it. The decision to reproduce graphic evidence photos in the book further increased the noise around Karla when it first hit shelves. Lawyer Tim Danson, representing the families of two of Bernardo and Homolka's victims, encouraged a voluntary censorship of the title among booksellers, and called for an investigation of Stephen Williams, suggesting two of the photos used were either illegally obtained or broke long-standing publication bans surrounding the case. Naturally, the press-friendly Danson couldn't have done more for the success of Karla if he'd been hired by Williams and Turgeon to do PR on the title.
While undoubtedly good for sales, the hype around Karla: A Pact with the Devil seems all the more silly when one gets past the lurid image of a red-eyed smiling killer on the cover, and actually reads Williams' fascinating account of Karla Homolka's history of prosecution and incarceration, often told by Homolka herself in whiny, self-serving letters to the author. And this is really what the book is about—the clumsy and legally dubious attempts by the Canadian corrections system to punish Karla Homolka beyond the traditional limits of her equally clumsy and dubious court-approved sentencing. That Williams managed to develop a correspondence with the same wily and egomaniacal killer he pilloried in an earlier book speaks to his incredible skill as a documentarist. Should Tim Danson ever get around to reading this book, he may find he has Williams to thank for opening up new avenues to the kind of righteous outrage that attracts reporters to press conferences.
Williams constructs a furiously detailed argument showing how Ms. Homolka is almost certainly guilty as hell of all the horror one can imagine connected to her case, yet was saved from a life sentence by careerist police officers, complacent mental health professionals and a generally lazy prosecution who saw an easy path to nailing Paul Bernardo and so took it, despite what must have been deep and troubling doubts about the star witness in their case. Williams does not question the possibility of Karla's genuine status as a battered and abused 'compliant victim' of the sexually sadistic rapist she married; he would just have preferred to see that status tested in open court. Instead, Homolka was rushed into her deal as a victim, and then later ill-treated by a prison system that decided after the fact to see her as a sexual criminal.
It is popularly held that Karla's deal would never have been offered her had the police and prosecution been aware of the starring role she played in most of Bernardo's worst crimes, but Williams is meticulous in his deconstruction of this idea. He digs into police and prosecution interviews with Karla in the days before her deal was finalized, showing that those most intimately involved in the case could not have been unaware of Karla's culpability. If this research is accurate, the picture drawn is one of official near-sightedness in the face of persistent, self-serving deception. Pretty much the only thing Karla needed to do to get her sweet deal was tell the undiluted truth, and yet Williams reveals her stringing together clumsy deceptions time and again, and how time and again these deceptions were glossed over, ignored or explained away by the people who should have used them to nail her. Despite her lies and even some early videotape evidence that clearly shows her involved in an attack on Jane Doe, the deal stood, balanced precariously on a hastily constructed platform of spousal abuse and emotional torment.
Later, of course, the full extent of the-horror-that-is-Karla was revealed in the Bernardo trial, and then still later we witnessed Karla getting her degree and celebrating her birthday in a pretty dress. All too late to do anything about reversing her deal, of course, and as it should be—the law is the law, and a reversible plea bargain makes future necessary plea bargains untenable. Better to just swallow the bitter pill of unfixable past incompetence and move on, having learned a valuable lesson. Yet sadly, as Williams documents, we're not allowed to move on, and we seem to have learned very little. The ineptitude of prosecution is followed by the ineptitude of incarceration, and we are subjected to the embarrassing spectacle of our prison system trying desperately to fight against inevitability and exact from Karla the justice it so desperately craves. Despite being a model prisoner, Karla is routinely denied her traditional privileges and a normal timeline for early release. At one point, Karla is subjected to a punitive transfer as payback for refusing to submit to tests she is under no legal obligation to take. By engaging in their own form of frontier justice, the Canadian corrections system thereby opens itself up to all sorts of dangerous and embarrassing outcomes, not the least of which is how incredibly ham-fisted it comes off in books like this. Karla Homolka seems to be one ambitious lawyer away from the kind of disastrously embarrassing lawsuit we all squirmed about in the Airbus investigation.
Should we feel sorry for Karla Homolka because the prison system is making her life more difficult than the law prescribes? Williams certainly does not feel sorry for her, but he does express a moral disappointment in the justice bureaucracy for consistently getting everything ass-backwards, to the detriment of its continued credibility. Stephen Williams writes a remarkable document, of interest to anyone who believes mistakes should be brought forward into the light and examined rather than hidden away to bury the shame of them. If Williams' careful research, gutsy interviewing and provocative publishing style do nothing else, perhaps they will at least embarrass the powers that be into sharpening their game.

A note on the publication of Karla:
Much has been made in the press and throughout the Canadian publishing industry about the use of sensational photographs and a cruelly ironic cover to sell this book. I say sell it however you can within the boundaries of the law, and push at those boundaries wherever possible. This is an important story; people should read it. On the other hand, Cantos has done its book and its readers a disservice by allowing lax editing and proofreading to disfigure Karla: A Pact With the Devil. The book shows unmistakable stylistic signs of a rush to publication and has, by far, the greatest number of typos I have ever seen in a professionally published work. I admire the debate and public conversation this book has inspired. That Turgeon should hand his and Williams's detractors such an easy means of attack is a shame.
John Degen (Books in Canada)
-- Books in Canada

(…) The content of Karla speaks for itself and indicates that the fury against Williams may be a classic case of shooting the messenger. (...) -- Trish wood, the globe and Mail: Crime : K is for Karla, and also for killer

A subject so profoundly disturbing demands that we must look at it. A consumed author refuses to do the prudent thing and walk away.

(...) -- Lynn Crosbie , The Toronto Star: Heart of Darkness

Written in an intriguing novelistic fashion, Karla picks Karla up where Invisible Darkness left her, painting her nails in her cell in solitary confinement in the gothic tower of Kingston’s Prison for Woman after testifying against her ex-husband in the summer of 1995. With a thriller’s pacing, the book charts the intimate cosmology of the world’s most notorious female prisoner. In Karla Williams lets Karla and the other key players speak for themselves.

Williams’s first book on the case, Invisible Darkness, was an in-depth investigation into the crimes, politics, policing, people and prosecution that swirled around the deadly and deviant duo. An instant best-seller, Invisible Darkness has sold over 350,000 copies throughout North America. In November 1998, the author was arrested and criminally charged with two counts, disobeying a court order. Two years after its publication, police concluded that 18 passages in the 650 page Invisible Darkness could not have been written unless the author has seen gruesome videotape evidence of the Bernardo’s crimes which had been protected by a judge’s order. After a two-year prosecution, Williams was acquitted. However, in preparation for his defense, he was forced to thoroughly review and catalogue his voluminous archive. It became clear that misconceptions about the deals that gave Karla a future were rampant. Why did the authorities really make the deals with Karla? Was it absolutely necessary that Karla be given a future or were there other, more insidious, agendas at work? What was behind the facade of rhetoric and obfuscation that the Ministry of the Attorney General and the police so assiduously propagated? What really happened over the years when that sweeping publication ban kept crucial information from the media and the public? The fact that Karla would soon disappear into that future made the answers to all of these questions even more urgent than they might otherwise be. Many of the answers lay buried in the author’s massive archives and files and then Karla decided she would answer some of the harder, more illusive questions herself. “Well, they say ‘never say never’ and they’re right,” Karla wrote in her startling first-ever correspondence. “Never in a million years did I think I would ever write a letter to someone from the media, let alone you who has condemned me so harshly.” So began one of the most controversial correspondences in Canadian history. Written in an intriguing novelistic fashion, Karla picks Karla up where Invisible Darkness left her, painting her nails in her cell in solitary confinement in the gothic tower of Kingston’s Prison for Woman after testifying against her ex-husband in the summer of 1995. With a thriller’s pacing, the book charts the intimate cosmology of the world’s most notorious female prisoner. In Karla Williams lets Karla and the other key players speak for themselves.

“What interests me is knowing what the wife was doing while he was off raping and killing.” With that statement in a one-page book proposal sent to four publishers in February, 1993, author Stephen Williams began a decade-long descent into the living hell Karla Homolka and her ex-husband Paul Bernardo created when they raped and murdered three teenage schoolgirls, one of whom was Karla’s own little sister

“People want me in max so my life will be hard but it really isn’t. There are absolutely no responsibilities here. Everything is provided. We can spend the day sleeping, sun-tanning or doing whatever we want all day every day.”

- Karla Homolka in a letter to author Stephen Williams

“Well, they say ‘never say never’ and they’re right,” Karla wrote in her startling first letter to author Stephen Williams. “Never in a million years did I think I would ever write a letter to someone from the media, let alone you who has condemned me so harshly.” Thus began one of the most controversial correspondences in Canadian history.

Written in an intriguing novelistic fashion, Karla picks Karla up where Williams’s first book on the case, Invisible Darkness, left her, painting her nails in her cell in solitary confinement in the gothic tower of Kingston’s Prison for Woman. After testifying against her ex-husband in the summer of 1995, her life in prison was soon going to take a very different, dramatic turn.

With a thriller’s pacing, Karla: A Pact with the Devil charts the intimate cosmology of the world’s most notorious female prisoner. Part memoir, part woman-in-prison story, part prognostication, part political exposé, in Karla Williams lets Karla and the other key players speak for themselves. And what they have to say will surprise, horrify and enlighten.

Stephen Williams has spent more than a decade, since the arrests of Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka in 1993, immersed in the darkness of their deeds and lives. Arrested in 1998 for allegedly having viewed videotape evidence restricted by court order during the Bernardo trial, Williams was acquitted on November 30, 2000. He lives on a farmhouse outside Harriston, Ontario, with writer Marsha Boulton. --This text refers to the Mass Market Paperback edition.