Hamlet is exiled to England after his father's untimely death. On the journey, his ship is attacked, and he washes up on shore at the feet and mercy of Richard III. Richard claims that Hamlet has been sent to fulfill prophecy as the Shadow King. He is the only one who can find the wizard, William Shakespeare and kill him. Others, however, have different ideas about this prophecy. They believe the Shadow King is to find Shakespeare, but return him to them and deliver them from the evil Richard. Richard desires to obtain Shakespeare's quill, which holds vast amounts of power; the people wish to overthrow his tyrannical rule.
So. I can pretty easily say that this is the worst graphic novel I have ever read. My boyfriend informs me that I've been spoiled. I only started reading graphic novels about 3 years ago, and in that time I've had nothing but the greats to consume--Sandman, Watchmen, Fables, Transmetropolitan, etc. I only recently started branching out and selecting my own graphic reads beyond what's been recommended to me. My first selection was American Vampire, which was very decent if not the love of my life; the second was A Flight of Angels. I loved it, it was visually the most beautiful graphic novel I've read to date, and the story was there to back it up. To me, Kill Shakespeare failed on both accounts.
What did I expect from Kill Shakespeare? Well, every little blurb kept screaming at me "THIS IS LIKE FABLES BUT WITH SHAKESPEARE INSTEAD OF FAIRY TALES". And I suppose it would be. If Fables had half-hearted art, no character development, and rushed plot lines. So needless to say, I had expectations that were a fair bit higher than what was delivered to me.
Maybe I just don't know my Shakespeare well enough to appreciate this (though I feel like I know it fairly well), but I found the plot jerked instead of flowed, and didn't really make a whole lot of sense when it came right down to the details...Hamlet, supposedly the prophesied savior of both sides of a fledgling battle, is more-or-less led around by the nose by the villains, ignoring mounting evidence against them and refusing to throw in with those rebelling against their evil overlord without first being slapped over the head with a frying pan full of `you're batting for the wrong team' omelets. I guess this would have been fine if I cared about the story, but I didn't. The wizard, William Shakespeare, was mentioned only as slightly more than a legend, and unfortunately there was no real build to back up the evil deeds of Richard III and the unrest of the people rising to rebel.
If Kill Shakespeare could have been stretched out as a longer series, maybe it would have been stronger. As is, I feel like they were really pushing to get every major character into six issues of story. But without some history given, or time to build up to the conflict, it's hard to illicit any interest.