Most helpful customer reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars
decent, May 25 2004
By A Customer
This review is from: Knowing What Students Know (Hardcover)
This book is not terrible and provides a good overview and introduction to assessment. The previous reviewer of this book could not have been more wrong about grades. Actually, research shows grades are a horrible predictor of success when controlling for other factors (income, socio-economic status, etc.). Research also shows there is *no* link between a grade and what someone has learned. This is because grades are relative and measure an individual's performance at one time, although I will admit that using multiple methods and more numerous testing will increase the validity of grades. If tied to the learning goals of a course, grades can be effective. But as a policy making tool or measure of what someone has learned, grades really don't say much, if anything at all.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1.0 out of 5 stars
An argument for fudging the data, July 31 2003
This review is from: Knowing What Students Know (Hardcover)
The thesis of this book is that (1) tests of educational assessment are increasingly being looked at by politicians (2) this has implications for the employment of educators and (3) being very clever, we teachers should be able to come up with new wasy of measuring student performance that won't actually test what the students have learned. Okay, perhaps that's a bit overly cynical. But not by much. Politicians are indeed looking closely at student performance, and for the first time in a long time, thinking about grading how well the public school are performing. And to be fair to the teachers, the intent often has as much to do with individual political aims as it does with education. So teachers repsond in kind, ganing the system, teaching to the exams and so forth. The only parties being left out of this game are the students themselves. Assessment is needed, both to judge how well students are doing, and to judge how well the schools themselves are doing. The finny thing is that there is a measure that's been ignored in all of this. It's called grading. Countless studies have been done over the past 50 years to determine what the best indicator of college performance is. People have looked at SAT scores, socioeconomic status, personality and dozens of other measure, and the one measure that consistently explains most of the varience is undergraduate grades. That's it. Even given the grade inflation of the past few decades, grades are still a pretty reasonable indicator.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 18 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
decent, May 25 2004
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Knowing What Students Know (Hardcover)
This book is not terrible and provides a good overview and introduction to assessment. The previous reviewer of this book could not have been more wrong about grades. Actually, research shows grades are a horrible predictor of success when controlling for other factors (income, socio-economic status, etc.). Research also shows there is *no* link between a grade and what someone has learned. This is because grades are relative and measure an individual's performance at one time, although I will admit that using multiple methods and more numerous testing will increase the validity of grades. If tied to the learning goals of a course, grades can be effective. But as a policy making tool or measure of what someone has learned, grades really don't say much, if anything at all.
5.0 out of 5 stars
Foundational, exhaustive, and cogent, Jan 8 2011
By David Abraham - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Knowing What Students Know (Hardcover)
Pellegrino, Chudwosky, and Glaser's book was the ubiquitous entry in each reference section of numerous articles I have read on educational assessment. By its very nature and scope, this report commissioned by the National Research Council and sponsored by the National Science Foundation undergirds any study in educational assessment. Without much fluff, a committee of well-qualified and experienced professionals set out to answer the simple but far from simplistic question that every educator asks of students, "How do I know they know?" Utilizing advances in contemporary theories of learning, cognition, and measurement, the authors lay a firm foundation for the study and the advancement of educational assessment. The language of the text is academic, illustrative material is succinct, references are exhaustive, and format is easily readable. "Implications for Assessment" are appropriately located in each section within the eight chapters of the book. I highly recommend this book for educational administrators, assessment designers, teachers, teacher educators, educational advocates, and educational assessment researchers. The report's authoritative comprehensiveness is the result of a concerted effort by a select group of scholars, driven by a singular intent, to produce a substantial foundation for the improvement of teaching, learning, and assessing.
5 of 9 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars
This book is a cure for insomnia, Feb 13 2009
By Mr. Sanford D. Horn - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Knowing What Students Know (Hardcover)
Unlike the book, this review will be pithy. Purely out of academic necessity I am required to read and utilize "Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment," for a class in the masters program in which I am enrolled in the area of Educational Management. The authors go to painstaking measures to demonstrate their knowledge of a subject that could be explained in half the amount of words and explanations. The book makes the subject matter more complicated than is necessary. It turns a dry subject into a veritable Sahara-like atmosphere.
|
|
|